Artificial Intelligence in Neurology and Stroke Education: Current Applications and Future Directions

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming neurology and stroke education through applications like automated feedback, adaptive simulations, and enhanced exposure to critical events. This narrative review explores foundational AI concepts, current educational uses in professional and patient training, virtual patients, tutoring tools, and personalized assessment. We evaluate the growing evidence for AI's effectiveness in improving knowledge, skills, and learner engagement, alongside implementation strategies. Key challenges include accuracy, bias, ethics, resource gaps, and potential skill decay. Conclusions emphasize that while AI shows promise for personalized learning and objective assessment, realizing its potential requires addressing barriers like cost-effectiveness, faculty readiness, and an evolving curriculum. Thoughtful integration requires rigorous validation, ethical standards, and further research into long-term outcomes. Ultimately, AI can complement traditional mentorship, preparing neurologists for data-driven practice.

Keywords

artificial intelligence - medical education - neurology training - clinical simulation - stroke assessment

Publication History

Received: 31 July 2025

Accepted: 29 September 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
01 October 2025

Article published online:
21 October 2025

• References

• 1 Sandrone S, Berthaud JV, Chuquilin M. et al. Neurologic and neuroscience education: Mitigating neurophobia to mentor health care providers. Neurology 2019; 92 (04) 174-179
• 2 Kleindorfer DO, Towfighi A, Chaturvedi S. et al. 2021 Guideline for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack: A guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2021; 52 (07) e364-e467
• 3 Mainali S, Darsie ME, Smetana KS. Machine learning in action: stroke diagnosis and outcome prediction. Front Neurol 2021; 12: 734345
• 4 Machleid F, Kaczmarczyk R, Johann D. et al. Perceptions of digital health education among European medical students: Mixed methods survey. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22 (08) e19827
• 5 Pinto Dos Santos D, Giese D, Brodehl S. et al. Medical students' attitude towards artificial intelligence: A multicentre survey. Eur Radiol 2019; 29 (04) 1640-1646
• 6 American Medical Association. Augmented Intelligence in Medical Education. AMA Council on Medical Education Report 4-A-19. 2019 . Accessed July 31, 2025 at: https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/cme-report-4-a19-annotated.pdf
• 7 Kedar S, Khazanchi D. Neurology education in the era of artificial intelligence. Curr Opin Neurol 2023; 36 (01) 51-58
• 8 Figari Jordan R, Sandrone S, Southerland AM. Opportunities and challenges for incorporating artificial intelligence and natural language processing in neurology education. Neurol Educ 2024; 3 (01) e200116
• 9 Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). Principles for the Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence in and for Medical Education. July 31, 2025 . Accessed September 13, 2025 at: https://www.aamc.org/about-us/mission-areas/medical-education/principles-ai-use
• 10 Alowais SA, Alghamdi SS, Alsuhebany N. et al. Revolutionizing healthcare: the role of AI in clinical practice. BMC Med Educ 2023; 23 (01) 689
• 11 Kim KJ. Medical student needs for e-learning: Perspectives of the generation Z. Korean J Med Educ 2024; 36 (04) 389-399
• 12 Kıyak YS, Emekli E. ChatGPT prompts for generating multiple-choice questions in medical education and evidence on their validity: A literature review. Postgrad Med J 2024; 100 (1189) 858-865
• 13 Ros-Arlanzón P, Perez-Sempere A, Evaluating AI. Evaluating AI competence in specialized medicine: Comparative analysis of ChatGPT and neurologists in a neurology specialist examination in Spain. JMIR Med Educ 2024; 10: e56762
• 14 Low YS, Jackson ML, Hyde RJ. et al. Answering real-world clinical questions using large language model, retrieval-augmented generation, and agentic systems. Digit Health 2025 11 :20552076251348850
• 15 Roustan D, Bastardot F. The clinicians' guide to large language models: A general perspective with a focus on hallucinations. Interact J Med Res 2025; 14: e59823
• 16 Cook DA, Overgaard J, Pankratz VS, Del Fiol G, Aakre CA. Virtual patients using large language models: Scalable, contextualized simulation of clinician-patient dialogue with feedback. J Med Internet Res 2025; 27: e68486
• 17 Peralta Ramirez AA, Trujillo López S, Navarro Armendariz GA, De la Torre Othón SA, Sierra Cervantes MR, Medina Aguirre JA. Clinical simulation with ChatGPT: A revolution in medical education?. J CME 2025; 14 (01) 2525615
• 18 Turner L, Hashimoto DA, Vasisht S, Schaye V, Demystifying AI. Demystifying AI: Current state and future role in medical education assessment. Acad Med 2024; 99 (4S Suppl 1): S42-S47
• 19 Chandrabhatla AS, Kuo EA, Sokolowski JD, Kellogg RT, Park M, Mastorakos P. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in the diagnosis and management of stroke: A narrative review of United States Food and Drug Administration-approved technologies. J Clin Med 2023; 12 (11) 3755
• 20 Darkhabani Z, Ezzeldin R, Delora A. et al. Current utilization and impact of AI LVO detection tools in acute stroke triage: A multicenter survey analysis. Neurol Res 2025; 1-10
• 21 Armoundas AA, Narayan SM, Arnett DK. et al; American Heart Association Institute for Precision Cardiovascular Medicine; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Lifelong Congenital Heart Disease and Heart Health in the Young; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; Council on Hypertension; Council on the Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease; and Stroke Council. Use of artificial intelligence in improving outcomes in heart disease: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2024; 149 (14) e1028-e1050
• 22 Senadheera I, Hettiarachchi P, Haslam B. et al. AI applications in adult stroke recovery and rehabilitation: A scoping review using AI. Sensors (Basel) 2024; 24 (20) 6585
• 23 Afridi A, Obaid S, Raheel N, Rathore FA. Integrating artificial intelligence in stroke rehabilitation: Current trends and future directions; A mini review. J Pak Med Assoc 2025; 75 (02) 445-447
• 24 Alhakeem A, Chaurasia B, Khan MM. Revolutionizing stroke prediction: a systematic review of AI-powered wearable technologies for early detection of stroke. Neurosurg Rev 2025; 48 (01) 458
• 25 Sallam M. ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: Systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11 (06) 887
• 26 Walker HL, Ghani S, Kuemmerli C. et al. Reliability of medical information provided by ChatGPT: Assessment against clinical guidelines and patient information quality instrument. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25: e47479
• 27 Lee JT, Li VCS, Wu JJ. et al. Evaluation of performance of generative large language models for stroke care. NPJ Digit Med 2025; 8 (01) 481
• 28 Amann J, Vayena E, Ormond KE, Frey D, Madai VI, Blasimme A. Expectations and attitudes towards medical artificial intelligence: A qualitative study in the field of stroke. PLoS One 2023; 18 (01) e0279088
• 29 Baillifard A, Gabella M, Banta Lavenex P, Martarelli CS. Effective learning with a personal AI tutor: A case study. Educ Inf Technol 2024; 30 (01) 297-312
• 30 Feigerlova E, Hani H, Hothersall-Davies E. A systematic review of the impact of artificial intelligence on educational outcomes in health professions education. BMC Med Educ 2025; 25 (01) 129
• 31 Fazlollahi AM, Bakhaidar M, Alsayegh A. et al. Effect of artificial intelligence tutoring vs expert instruction on learning simulated surgical skills among medical students: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5 (02) e2149008
• 32 Gordon M, Daniel M, Ajiboye A. et al. A scoping review of artificial intelligence in medical education: BEME Guide No. 84. Med Teach 2024; 46 (04) 446-470
• 33 Brodeur PG, Buckley TA, Kanjee Z. et al. Superhuman performance of a large language model on the reasoning tasks of a physician. arXiv:2412.10849. Submitted on December 14, 2024 (revised June 2, 2025)
• 34 Goh E, Gallo R, Hom J. et al. Large language model influence on diagnostic reasoning: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7 (10) e2440969
• 35 Bohmann FO, Gruber K, Kurka N. et al; STREAM Trial investigators. Simulation-based training improves process times in acute stroke care (STREAM). Eur J Neurol 2022; 29 (01) 138-148
• 36 Matheny ME, Thadaney Israni S, Ahmed M, Whicher D. (eds). Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: The Hope, the Hype, the Promise, the Peril. National Academy of Medicine. 2019 . Accessed July 31, 2025 at: https://nam.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/4.3-AI-in-Health-Care-title-authors-summary.pdf
• 37 Kim S, Kim SH, Kim H, Lee YM. Integrating artificial intelligence into medical curricula: perspectives of faculty and students in South Korea. Korean J Med Educ 2025; 37 (01) 65-70
• 38 Boyle P. AI in medical education: 5 ways schools are employing new tools. AAMC. Published February 27, 2025 . Accessed July 31, 2025 at: https://www.aamc.org/news/ai-medical-education-5-ways-schools-are-employing-new-tools
• 39 Perkins SW, Muste JC, Alam T, Singh RP. Improving clinical documentation with artificial intelligence: A systematic review. Perspect Health Inf Manag 2024; 21 (02) 1d
• 40 Duggan MJ, Gervase J, Schoenbaum A. et al. Clinician experiences with ambient scribe technology to assist with documentation burden and efficiency. JAMA Netw Open 2025; 8 (02) e2460637
• 41 Chomutare T, Svenning TO, Hernández MÁT. et al. artificial intelligence to improve clinical coding practice in Scandinavia: Crossover randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2025; 27: e71904
• 42 Abukhadijah HJ, Nashwan AJ. Transforming hospital quality improvement through harnessing the power of artificial intelligence. Glob J Qual Saf Healthc 2024; 7 (03) 132-139
• 43 Burk-Rafel J, Reinstein I, Feng J. et al. Development and validation of a machine learning-based decision support tool for residency applicant screening and review. Acad Med 2021; 96 (11S): S54-S61
• 44 Gottlieb-Smith R, Xixis K, Martindale JM, Goldstein JHR, Rosati J. Artificial intelligence in residency recruitment: Impact on equity. Neurol Educ 2024; 3 (03) e200150
• 45 Abbas A, Toor J, Margalik DA. et al. Machine learning to improve resident scheduling: Harnessing artificial intelligence to enhance resident wellness. J Reg Med Campuses 2025 8 01
• 46 Masters K, MacNeil H, Benjamin J. et al. Artificial Intelligence in Health Professions Education Assessment: AMEE Guide No. 178. Med Teach 2025; 47 (09) 1410-1424
• 47 American Medical Association. Augmented Intelligence in Health Care H-480.940. AMA-ASSN.org. 2025 . Accessed September 13, 2025 at: https://policysearch.ama-assn.org/policyfinder/detail/H-480.940?uri=%2FAMADoc%2FHOD.xml-H-480.940.xml
• 48 J. Wu K, Wu E, Theodorou B. et al. Characterizing the clinical adoption of medical AI devices through U.S. insurance claims. NEJM AI 2024 1 01
• 49 American Medical Association. Artificial and Augmented Intelligence in Health Care [CME course]. AMA Ed Hub. Accessed September 13, 2025 at: https://edhub.ama-assn.org/course/318
• 50 American Academy of Neurology. 2025 Annual Meeting | C191–Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Neurology [Seminar]. April 9, 2025 . San Diego, CA and Online. Accessed September 13, 2025 at: https://www.aan.com/msa/Public/Events/Details/18088
• 51 American Academy of Neurology. Artificial intelligence resources. Accessed September 13, 2025 at: https://www.aan.com/tools-resources/artificial-intelligence-resources
• 52 Clarke AJ, Burgess A, van Diggele C, Mellis C. The role of reverse mentoring in medical education: current insights. Adv Med Educ Pract 2019; 10: 693-701
• 53 Raju SA, Ching HL, Jalal M. et al. Does reverse mentoring work in the NHS: A feasibility study of clinicians in practice. BMJ Open 2022; 12 (11) e062361
• 54 Scandiffio J, Zhang M, Karsan I. et al. The role of mentoring and coaching of healthcare professionals for digital technology adoption and implementation: A scoping review. Digit Health 2024 10 :20552076241238075
• 55 Macnamara BN, Berber I, Çavuşoğlu MC. et al. Does using artificial intelligence assistance accelerate skill decay and hinder skill development without performers' awareness?. Cogn Res Princ Implic 2024; 9 (01) 46
• 56 Russell RG, Lovett Novak L, Patel M. et al. Competencies for the use of artificial intelligence–based tools by health care professionals. Acad Med 2023; 98 (03) 348-356
• 57 Liu M, Ning Y, Teixayavong S. et al. A scoping review and evidence gap analysis of clinical AI fairness. NPJ Digit Med 2025; 8 (01) 360