Facial Plast Surg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2714-3624
Original Research

More Healing Hands Through More Harmonized Voices: The SCALPEL Study

Authors

  • Kiran Abraham-Aggarwal

    1   School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States
    2   Facial Plastic Surgery, Guthrie Health, Sayre, Pennsylvania, United States
    3   Post-Baccalaureate Pre-Medical Program, Goucher College, Towson, Maryland, United States
    4   Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States
  • Andrew Yang

    5   Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, United States
  • Christie Hung

    6   Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, New York, United States
  • Daniel Spertus

    4   Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States
    7   Department of Economics, University of Southern California, California, United States
  • John Frodel

    2   Facial Plastic Surgery, Guthrie Health, Sayre, Pennsylvania, United States
Preview

Abstract

Introduction

Burnout and declining fulfillment are prevalent among facial plastic surgeons (FPS), yet the organizational drivers of these challenges remain underexplored. Ownership structure, workplace autonomy, and collective representation may influence surgeon well-being and workforce sustainability.

Objectives and Hypotheses

To assess how autonomy, ownership, and unionization relate to satisfaction and stress among FPS. We hypothesized that private practitioners would report greater autonomy and satisfaction, that academic and hospital-employed surgeons would experience more stress and diminished control, and that prior union exposure would correspond with more favorable views of collective representation.

Study Design

Cross-sectional observational survey (STROBE).

Methods

A 26-item anonymous survey was distributed to all 1,041 members of the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery; 104 responded (10%). Variables included practice type, ownership, union history, autonomy, compensation satisfaction, stressors, and openness to unionization. Analyses employed chi-square tests and qualitative content analysis.

Results

Surgeons in private practice reported the highest autonomy and compensation satisfaction and the lowest rates of feeling rushed. Hospital-employed and academic surgeons were more likely to report diminished autonomy, administrative stress, and lack of influence over workplace decisions. Only 11% of respondents expressed interest in unionizing, though prior union members generally described positive experiences. Surgeons' beliefs about whether unionization affects patient care did not vary significantly by practice setting.

Conclusion

Structural factors, particularly the autonomy and ownership model, are strongly linked to satisfaction and stress among FPS. Organizational reforms that enhance autonomy and support collective voice may reduce burnout and improve workforce sustainability.

Declaration of GenAI Use

This work was created entirely by the authors and in no way by artificial intelligence (AI). Please do not reprint, copy, or otherwise distribute this document without our express permission. Please do not input this piece into ChatGPT or any other AI service.


Contributors' Statement

All authors contributed sufficiently to this manuscript. K.A. conducted the following: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, resources, software, supervision, validation, visualization, writing (original and review). A.Y. conducted the following: formal analysis, investigation, methodology, software, validation, visualization, writing (original and review). C.H. conducted the following: formal analysis, investigation, methodology, software, validation, writing (original and review). D.S. conducted the following: formal analysis, investigation, methodology, software, validation, writing (original and review). J.F. conducted the following: conceptualization, data curation, investigation, methodology, supervision, validation, writing (original and review).




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 24. September 2025

Angenommen: 30. September 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
01. Oktober 2025

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
14. Oktober 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA