Complications and Donor Site Morbidity in Harvesting the Intercostal Main Nerve as a Graft for Breast Neurotization in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction

Ying-Hsuan Lee; Jung-Ju Huang; Johnny Chuieng-Yi Lu; David Chon-Fok Cheong; Chai-Fang Chen; Tommy Nai-Jen Chang

doi:10.1055/a-2717-4502

Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery, Inhaltsverzeichnis

J Reconstr Microsurg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2717-4502

Original Article

Complications and Donor Site Morbidity in Harvesting the Intercostal Main Nerve as a Graft for Breast Neurotization in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction

Autoren

Ying-Hsuan Lee

¹Division of Reconstructive Microsurgery, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan
Jung-Ju Huang

¹Division of Reconstructive Microsurgery, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan

²College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan

³Breast Cancer Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan
Johnny Chuieng-Yi Lu

¹Division of Reconstructive Microsurgery, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan

²College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
David Chon-Fok Cheong

¹Division of Reconstructive Microsurgery, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan

²College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan

³Breast Cancer Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan
Chai-Fang Chen

¹Division of Reconstructive Microsurgery, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan

²College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan

³Breast Cancer Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan
Tommy Nai-Jen Chang

¹Division of Reconstructive Microsurgery, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan

²College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan

⁴Founder, International Microsurgery Club, Taipei, Taiwan

Abstract

Background

Breast neurotization using autologous grafts has been indicated to be effective. Previous studies focused mainly on restoring sensation and optimizing the operative techniques of neurotization in microsurgical breast reconstruction. There are few studies on the adverse effects and potential risks associated with simultaneous microsurgical breast reconstruction and neurotization procedures. The rates of overall and pulmonary complications in patients receiving neurotization during autologous breast reconstruction were examined in this study.

Methods

A retrospective comparative study was conducted between two groups of patients: 100 consecutive patients (reinnervation group) underwent neurotization procedures during deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) breast reconstruction, while the other 100 patients (control group) underwent DIEP breast reconstruction alone. The patients' demographic data, reconstructive methods, postoperative complications, specific pulmonary complications, and length of hospital stay were reviewed.

Results

The overall complication rates were 23% in the reinnervation group and 20% in the control group (p = 0.731), and this difference was not statistically significant. The incidence rates of vascular insufficiency (7% vs. 9%), pneumothorax (5% vs. 3%), hematoma/seroma (2% vs. 3%), and wound infection (1% vs. 2%) were similar between the reinnervation group and the control group. A greater percentage of patients in the reinnervation group developed pleural effusion than did those in the control group (12% vs. 4%, p = 0.037), whereas the majority of the patients in the reinnervation group were asymptomatic and managed conservatively.

Conclusion

Although harvesting the main intercostal nerve for breast neurotization may irritate the pleura, the effect was minimal and manageable. This procedure is safe and feasible and can be widely applied in breast reconstruction.

Keywords

breast neurotization - breast reconstruction - intercostal nerve graft - donor site morbidity

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Gradishar WJ, Moran MS, Abraham J. et al. Breast Cancer, Version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2022; 20 (06) 691-722
2 Fung KW, Lau Y, Fielding R, Or A, Yip AWC. The impact of mastectomy, breast-conserving treatment and immediate breast reconstruction on the quality of life of Chinese women. ANZ J Surg 2001; 71 (04) 202-206
3 Siotos C, Naska A, Bello RJ. et al. Survival and disease recurrence rates among breast cancer patients following mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 144 (02) 169e-177e
4 Downing R, Windsor CW. Disturbance of sensation after mastectomy. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984; 288 (6431) 1650
5 Shridharani SM, Magarakis M, Stapleton SM, Basdag B, Seal SM, Rosson GD. Breast sensation after breast reconstruction: a systematic review. J Reconstr Microsurg 2010; 26 (05) 303-310
6 Dossett LA, Lowe J, Sun W. et al. Prospective evaluation of skin and nipple-areola sensation and patient satisfaction after nipple-sparing mastectomy. J Surg Oncol 2016; 114 (01) 11-16
7 Rodriguez-Unda NA, Bello RJ, Clarke-Pearson EM. et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy improves long-term nipple but not skin sensation after breast reconstruction: quantification of long-term sensation in nipple sparing versus non-nipple sparing mastectomy. Ann Plast Surg 2017; 78 (06) 697-703
8 Gahm J, Hansson P, Brandberg Y, Wickman M. Breast sensibility after bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013; 66 (11) 1521-1527
9 Enajat M, Rozen WM, Audolfsson T, Acosta R. Thermal injuries in the insensate deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap: case series and literature review on mechanisms of injury. Microsurgery 2009; 29 (03) 214-217
10 Faulkner HR, Colwell AS, Liao EC, Winograd JM, Austen Jr WG. Thermal injury to reconstructed breasts from commonly used warming devices: a risk for reconstructive failure. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2016; 4 (10) e1033
11 Shaw WW, Orringer JS, Ko CY, Ratto LL, Mersmann CA. The spontaneous return of sensibility in breasts reconstructed with autologous tissues. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99 (02) 394-399
12 Passavanti MB, Pace MC, Barbarisi A. et al. Pain and sensory dysfunction after breast cancer surgery: neurometer CPT evaluation. Anticancer Res 2006; 26 (5B): 3839-3844
13 Heine N, Koch C, Brebant V, Kehrer A, Anker A, Prantl L. Breast sensitivity after mastectomy and autologous reconstruction. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2017; 67 (3-4): 459-465
14 Tindholdt TT, Tønseth KA. Spontaneous reinnervation of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps after secondary breast reconstruction. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2008; 42 (01) 28-31
15 Mori H, Okazaki M. Is the sensitivity of skin-sparing mastectomy or nipple-sparing mastectomy superior to conventional mastectomy with innervated flap?. Microsurgery 2011; 31 (06) 428-433
16 Slezak S, McGibbon B, Dellon AL. The sensational transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap: return of sensibility after TRAM breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 1992; 28 (03) 210-217
17 Spiegel AJ, Menn ZK, Eldor L, Kaufman Y, Dellon AL. Breast reinnervation: DIEP neurotization using the third anterior intercostal nerve. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2013; 1 (08) e72
18 Puonti HK, Jääskeläinen SK, Hallikainen HK, Partanen TA. Improved sensory recovery with a novel dual neurorrhaphy technique for breast reconstruction with free muscle sparing TRAM flap technique. Microsurgery 2017; 37 (01) 21-28
19 Djohan R, Scomacao I, Knackstedt R, Cakmakoglu C, Grobmyer SR. Neurotization of the nipple-areola complex during implant-based reconstruction: evaluation of early sensation recovery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 146 (02) 250-254
20 Ducic I, Yoon J, Momeni A, Ahcan U. Anatomical considerations to optimize sensory recovery in breast neurotization with allograft. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2018; 6 (11) e1985
21 Momeni A, Meyer S, Shefren K, Januszyk M. Flap neurotization in breast reconstruction with nerve allografts: 1-year clinical outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021; 9 (01) e3328
22 Djohan R, Scomacao I, Duraes EFR, Knackstedt R, Mangan R, Schwarz G. Sensory restoration in abdominally based free flaps for breast reconstruction using nerve allograft. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 151 (01) 25-33
23 Chang TN, Lu JC, Sung CW. et al. Elongation of intercostal nerve cutaneous branches for breast and nipple neurotization during breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer: case-control study. Br J Surg 2024; 111 (02) znae005
24 Shyu S, Chang TN, Lu JC. et al. Breast neurotization along with breast reconstruction after nipple sparing mastectomy enhances quality of life and reduces denervation symptoms in patient-reported outcome: a prospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2025; 111 (05) 3235-3247
25 Temple CLF, Ross DC, Kim S. et al. Sensibility following innervated free TRAM flap for breast reconstruction: Part II. Innervation improves patient-rated quality of life. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (05) 1419-1425
26 Cornelissen AJM, Beugels J, van Kuijk SMJ. et al. Sensation of the autologous reconstructed breast improves quality of life: a pilot study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 167 (03) 687-695
27 Mehrara BJ, Santoro TD, Arcilla E, Watson JP, Shaw WW, Da Lio AL. Complications after microvascular breast reconstruction: experience with 1195 flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118 (05) 1100-1109
28 Chen CM, Halvorson EG, Disa JJ. et al. Immediate postoperative complications in DIEP versus free/muscle-sparing TRAM flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (06) 1477-1482
29 Nelson JA, Guo Y, Sonnad SS. et al. A comparison between DIEP and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps in breast reconstruction: a single surgeon's recent experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (05) 1428-1435
30 Kelling JA, Meade A, Adkins M, Zhang AY. Risk of pneumothorax with internal mammary vessel utilization in autologous breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2021; 86 (3S, Suppl 2): S184-S188
31 Patel AJ, Malata CM. Intercostal drain insertion for pneumothorax following free flap breast reconstruction—a near miss!. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63 (11) 1929-1931
32 Sacks JM, Chang DW. Rib-sparing internal mammary vessel harvest for microvascular breast reconstruction in 100 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (05) 1403-1407
33 Banwell M, Trotter D, Ramakrishnan V. The thoracodorsal artery and vein as recipient vessels for microsurgical breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 68 (05) 542-543
34 O'Neill RC, Spiegel AJ. Modern approaches to breast neurotization. Clin Plast Surg 2023; 50 (02) 347-355
35 Bassilios Habre S, Bond G, Jing XL, Kostopoulos E, Wallace RD, Konofaos P. The surgical management of nerve gaps: present and future. Ann Plast Surg 2018; 80 (03) 252-261
36 Broeren BO, Hundepool CA, Kumas AH. et al. The effectiveness of acellular nerve allografts compared to autografts in animal models: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2024; 19 (01) e0279324
37 Chuang ML, Chuang DC, Lin IF, Vintch JR, Ker JJ, Tsao TC. Ventilation and exercise performance after phrenic nerve and multiple intercostal nerve transfers for avulsed brachial plexus injury. Chest 2005; 128 (05) 3434-3439
38 Zhang C, Moroni EA, Moreira AA. One size does not fit all: prediction of nerve length in implant-based nipple-areola complex neurotization. J Reconstr Microsurg 2025; 41 (07) 566-574

Zusatzmaterial

Supplementary Material (PDF) (opens in new window)