Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2717-4665
Keep Your Friends Close and Your Teammates Closer: The Impact of Staffing with Familiar Personnel in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction
Authors
Abstract
Background
Microsurgical breast reconstruction is intraoperatively complex. Evidence of standardized workflows improving outcomes exists, but the impact of staffing cases with familiar personnel is not documented.
Methods
All microsurgical breast reconstructions (July 2021–June 2024) at our institution were analyzed for staff familiarity at granular time intervals (T0: setup to incision, T1-T3: each third of procedure). Staff were deemed “unfamiliar” if they staffed <2 microsurgical breast reconstructions with the attending in past 4 months. Intraoperative setbacks included anastomotic revisions, vessel damage, switching recipient vessels, or mastectomy flap defect. Major complications included operative takeback or flap loss.
Results
Among 291 surgeries (5 attendings, 2 hospitals), 35.1% were immediate, 77.3% used standard hemiabdominal DIEP flaps, 58.4% were bilateral, and 49.5% had prior radiation. Intraoperative setbacks occurred in 19.7%, major complications in 7.4%, average duration was 631.6 minutes, and supply costs averaged $5,216. Unfamiliar scrub-techs correlated with increased intraoperative setbacks (OR: 2.11, p < 0.05), particularly in early time intervals (T1: 1.91, p = 0.06; T2: 2.09, p < 0.05). Unfamiliar circulators correlated with increased supply costs (+12.2%, p < 0.05), especially in later time intervals (T2: +12.2%, p < 0.05; T3: +16.0%, p < 0.05). In addition to staff familiarity, at univariate level, intraoperative setbacks also correlated with prior radiation (p < 0.05), duration correlated with laterality, immediate reconstructions, mastectomy type, and anastomoses (p < 0.05), and costs correlated with anastomoses (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis confirmed unfamiliar scrub-techs and circulators were significantly correlated with increased intraoperative setbacks and higher costs (p < 0.05), with a trend toward longer duration (p = 0.06).
Conclusion
In microsurgical breast reconstruction, unfamiliar teams correlated with increased intraoperative setbacks, costs, and durations. Adjusting staffing models to prioritize familiarity may provide medical, financial, and logistical benefits.
Keywords
teaming - operating room efficiency - microsurgical breast reconstruction - cost saving - intraoperative setbacks - complicationsPublication History
Received: 18 May 2025
Accepted: 21 September 2025
Accepted Manuscript online:
10 October 2025
Article published online:
28 October 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Rose J, Puckett Y. Breast Reconstruction Free Flaps. In: StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; 2023. . Accessed December 16, 2024 at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/books/NBK541048/
- 2 Fijany AJ, Friedlich N, Olsson SE, Bishay AE, Pekarev M. Current trends in autologous breast reconstruction and the implications of impending changes to insurance reimbursement. Cureus 2023; 15 (08) e43855
- 3 Menon A, Brown CA, Losken A, Garcia Nores GDP. Microsurgical breast reconstruction in the United States: a narrative review of the current state. Gland Surg 2024; 13 (08) 1535-1551
- 4 Nelson JA, Allen Jr RJ, Polanco T. et al. Long-term patient-reported outcomes following postmastectomy breast reconstruction: an 8-year examination of 3268 patients. Ann Surg 2019; 270 (03) 473-483
- 5 Egan KG, Elver AA, Godbe KN. et al. Quantifying complications: an analysis of operative time and intraoperative factors in microsurgical breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2023; 39 (01) 43-47
- 6 Opsomer D, D'Arpa S, Benmeridja L, Stillaert F, Noel W, Van Landuyt K. Bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction to a single set of internal mammary vessels: technique, safety, and outcomes after 250 flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 144 (04) 554e-564e
- 7 Billig JI, Lu Y, Momoh AO, Chung KC. A nationwide analysis of cost variation for autologous free flap breast reconstruction. JAMA Surg 2017; 152 (11) 1039-1047
- 8 Cai Y, Boas SR, Summerville L, Kumar A. National trends in hospitalization charges for autologous free lap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2020; 85 (S1, Suppl 1): S135-S140
- 9 Irawati N, Every J, Dawson R. et al. Effect of operative time on complications associated with free flap reconstruction of the head and neck. Clin Otolaryngol 2023; 48 (02) 175-181
- 10 Qiu CS, Jordan SW, Dorfman RG, Vu MM, Alghoul MS, Kim JYS. Surgical duration impacts venous thromboembolism risk in microsurgical breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34 (01) 47-58
- 11 Wen YE, Steppe C, Teotia SS, Haddock NT. Operative time predicts long-term abdominal morbidity and complication requiring treatment after DIEP flap breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2024; 40 (03) 217-226
- 12 Hardy KL, Davis KE, Constantine RS. et al. The impact of operative time on complications after plastic surgery: a multivariate regression analysis of 1753 cases. Aesthet Surg J 2014; 34 (04) 614-622
- 13 Godbe KN, Rauber E, Nazir N. et al. Intraoperative complications as predictors of flap failure in autologous breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2025; 41 (06) 489-494
- 14 Haddock NT, Wen YE, Steppe C, Shang Z, Teotia SS. Operative time predicts postoperative outcomes in bilateral DIEP flap reconstruction: multivariate 1000 flap analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2022; 10 (12) e4713
- 15 Nealon K, Rebello M, Sobti N. et al. Improving surgical efficiency of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 176 (01) 159-164
- 16 Subramaniam S, Tanna N, Smith ML. Operative efficiency in deep inferior epigastric perforator flap reconstruction: key concepts and implementation. Clin Plast Surg 2023; 50 (02) 281-288
- 17 Tanna N, Clappier M, Barnett SL. et al. Streamlining and consistency in surgery: lean six sigma to improve operating room efficiency. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 152 (03) 682-690
- 18 Lee BT, Tobias AM, Yueh JH. et al. Design and impact of an intraoperative pathway: a new operating room model for team-based practice. J Am Coll Surg 2008; 207 (06) 865-873
- 19 Mericli AF, Chu CK, Sisk GC. et al. Microvascular breast reconstruction in the era of value-based care: use of a cosurgeon is associated with reduced costs, improved outcomes, and added value. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 149 (02) 338-348
- 20 Weichman KE, Lam G, Wilson SC. et al. The impact of two operating surgeons on microsurgical breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (02) 277-284
- 21 Lingard L, Espin S, Whyte S. et al. Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects. Qual Saf Health Care 2004; 13 (05) 330-334
- 22 Christian CK, Gustafson ML, Roth EM. et al. A prospective study of patient safety in the operating room. Surgery 2006; 139 (02) 159-173
- 23 Frasier LL, Pavuluri Quamme SR, Ma Y. et al. Familiarity and communication in the operating room. J Surg Res 2019; 235: 395-403
- 24 Xu R, Carty MJ, Orgill DP, Lipsitz SR, Duclos A. The teaming curve: a longitudinal study of the influence of surgical team familiarity on operative time. Ann Surg 2013; 258 (06) 953-957
- 25 Doll D, Kauf P, Wieferich K, Schiffer R, Luedi MM. Implications of perioperative team setups for operating room management decisions. Anesth Analg 2017; 124 (01) 262-269
- 26 Wallace L, Muir M, Romano L, Wyllie T, Gyomber D, Hodgson R. Assessing operating theatre efficiency: a prospective cohort study to identify intervention targets to improve efficiency. ANZ J Surg 2021; 91 (11) 2382-2388
- 27 Anderson C, Talsma A. Characterizing the structure of operating room staffing using social network analysis. Nurs Res 2011; 60 (06) 378-385
- 28 ElBardissi AW, Wiegmann DA, Henrickson S, Wadhera R, Sundt III TM. Identifying methods to improve heart surgery: an operative approach and strategy for implementation on an organizational level. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008; 34 (05) 1027-1033
- 29 Fracol ME, Basta MN, Nelson JA. et al. Bilateral free flap breast reconstruction after unilateral radiation: comparing intraoperative vascular complications and postoperative outcomes in radiated versus nonradiated breasts. Ann Plast Surg 2016; 76 (03) 311-314
