RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/a-2733-4361
Variables Associated with Treatment Failure after Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Poststernotomy Mediastinitis: A Case–Control Study
Autoren
Abstract
Background
This study investigated factors leading to treatment failure after negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in poststernotomy mediastinitis (PSM) patients.
Methods
A single-center retrospective case–control study in 198 cardiac surgery patients with PSM and consecutive NPWT were retrospectively divided into two groups. Group I consisted of patients whose NPWT was successful (n = 117/198; 59.1%), while in Group II treatment, failure occurred (n = 81/198; 40.9%). The primary endpoint was treatment failure, defined as recurrence of wound infection requiring surgical treatment within 30 days after secondary wound closure.
Results
Body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m2 (p = 0.04; odds ratio [OR] 1.07), diabetes mellitus (DM; p = 0.03; OR 1.94), and the number of sponge changes (p = 0.01; OR 1.57) showed an association with the occurrence of NPWT failure. During the study period, 10/198 (19.8%) patients died after secondary wound healing. In group I, 1/117 (0.9%) patient died versus group II with 9/81 (12.7%) patients. About 70% patients died from septic multiple organ failure.
Conclusion
This study confirms that variables associated with treatment failure after NPWT in PSM are BMI >30 kg/m2, diabetes mellitus (DM), and the “number of sponge changes,” respectively. However, this does not mean that sponge changes increase the risk; rather, sponge changes are associated with more resistant germs, incomplete wound healing, and more aggressive infection. This implies that management should be in the hands of cardiac surgeons with extensive experience in septic surgery and at centers with expertise in order to minimize the duration of NPWT and thus the number of sponge changes.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 09. Mai 2025
Angenommen: 28. Oktober 2025
Accepted Manuscript online:
30. Oktober 2025
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
13. November 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Schimmer C, Kühnel RU, Waldow T. et al. S3-Leitlinie “Management der Mediastinitis nach herzchirurgischem Eingriff” AWMF-Register-Nummer: 011–022. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019; 67 (03) 131-167
- 2 Hersh RE, Kaza AK, Long SM, Fiser SM, Drake DB, Tribble CG. A technique for the treatment of sternal infections using the vacuum assisted closure device. Heart Surg Forum 2001; 4 (03) 211-215
- 3 Hersh RE, Jack JM, Dahman MI, Morgan RF, Drake DB. The vacuum-assisted closure device as a bridge to sternal wound closure. Ann Plast Surg 2001; 46 (03) 250-254
- 4 Obdeijn MC, de Lange MY, Lichtendahl DH, de Boer WJ. Vacuum-assisted closure in the treatment of poststernotomy mediastinitis. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68 (06) 2358-2360
- 5 Bermúdez AD, García N, Martín M. et al. Impacto de la terapia de vacío en el tratamiento de las infecciones profundas y mediastinitis tras esterotomía media en los últimos 10 anyos. Cir Cardiovasc 2017; 24 (05) 293-297
- 6 Szabo AK, Hamouda K, Bening C. et al. “Negative pressure wound therapy” bei sternalen Wundinfektionen. Z Herz Thorax Gefasschir 2017; 31 (03) 161-168
- 7 Gaudreau G, Costache V, Houde C. et al. Recurrent sternal infection following treatment with negative pressure wound therapy and titanium transverse plate fixation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010; 37 (04) 888-892
- 8 Listewnik MJ, Sielicki P, Mokrzycki K, Biskupski A, Brykczyński M. The use of vacuum-assisted closure in purulent complications and difficult-to-heal wounds in cardiac surgery. Adv Clin Exp Med 2015; 24 (04) 643-650
- 9 Gdalevitch P, Afilalo J, Lee C. Predictors of vacuum-assisted closure failure of sternotomy wounds. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63 (01) 180-183
- 10 De Martino A, Re FD, Falcetta G, Morganti R, Ravenni G, Bortolotti U. Sternal wound complications: Results of routine use of negative pressure wound therapy. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg 2020; 35 (01) 50-57
- 11 Kozlow JH, Patel SP, Jejurikar S, Pannucci CJ, Cederna PS, Brown DL. Complications after sternal reconstruction: A 16-y experience. J Surg Res 2015; 194 (01) 154-160
- 12 Zahiri HR, Lumpkins K, Kelishadi SS. et al. Significant predictors of complications after sternal wound reconstruction: A 21-year experience. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 69 (04) 439-441
- 13 Hashimoto I, Takaku M, Matsuo S. et al. Risk factors for complications after reconstructive surgery for sternal wound infection. Arch Plast Surg 2014; 41 (03) 253-257
- 14 van Wingerden JJ, Lapid O, Boonstra PW, de Mol BA. Muscle flaps or omental flap in the management of deep sternal wound infection. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2011; 13 (02) 179-187
- 15 Piwnica-Worms W, Azoury SC, Kozak G. et al. Flap reconstruction for deep sternal wound infections: Factors influencing morbidity and mortality. Ann Thorac Surg 2020; 109 (05) 1584-1590
- 16 Cancelli G, Alzghari T, Dimagli A. et al. Mortality after sternal reconstruction with pectoralis major flap vs omental flap for postsurgical mediastinitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Card Surg 2022; 37 (12) 5263-5268
- 17 Feller K, Schipper L, Liu J. et al. Management of sternal wound infection-determinants of length of stay and recurrence of infection after muscle flap coverage. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2024; 72 (01) 63-69