RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/a-2749-6666
Effect of Plate–Bone Distance and Screw Number on 2.0-mm Locking Construct Torsional Stiffness and Plate Strain in a Diaphyseal Fracture Gap Model
Autoren
Funding Information Implants used in this study were funded by a materials grant from Zebravet Australia.
Abstract
Objective
To determine the effect of plate–bone distance and screw number on 2.0-mm locking compression plate (LCP) torsional stiffness and plate strain for a fixed working length in a diaphyseal fracture gap model.
Study Design
In vitro biomechanical study.
Methods
The LCP was tested with nine different combinations of plate–bone distance (PBD) (1, 1.5, and 3 mm) and screw number (SN) (two, three, or four screws per fragment) across the same working length. Six replicates per group were tested. Constructs were subjected to quasi-static, non-destructive torsion producing overall construct stiffness data (Nm/degree). Plate surface strain data were recorded from three-dimensional digital image correlation during testing for all constructs.
Results
A greater PBD and a low SN resulted in lower construct stiffness (p = 0.015, and P > 0.0001, respectively) in torsion. Across all PBD, there was significantly less stiffness for constructs with two screws per fragment, compared with three screws or four screws. No significant difference was detected in plate strain for any combination of PBD and SN.
Conclusion
In this model, incrementally increasing the PBD and decreasing the SN resulted in less construct stiffness in torsion, with marked reduction in torsional stiffness in constructs with two screws per fragment compared with three or four screws per fragment.
Contributors' Statement
A.E. contributed to conception of study, study design, acquisition of data, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript preparation, and review; M.G. contributed to conception of study, study design, acquisition of data, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript preparation, and review; R.D. contributed to study design, acquisition of data, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript preparation, and review; G.H. contributed to conception of study, study design, acquisition of data, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript preparation, and review. All authors revised and approved the submitted manuscript.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 13. April 2025
Angenommen: 17. November 2025
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
01. Dezember 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Roe S. Biomechanics of fracture fixation. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2020; 50 (01) 1-15
- 2 Sistaninia M, Niffenegger M. Fatigue crack initiation and crystallographic growth in 316L stainless steel. Int J Fatigue 2015; 70: 163-170
- 3 MacLeod AR, Pankaj P. Pre-operative planning for fracture fixation using locking plates: device configuration and other considerations. Injury 2018; 49 (Suppl. 01) S12-S18
- 4 Gautier E, Sommer C. Guidelines for the clinical application of the LCP. Injury 2003; 34 (Suppl. 02) B63-B76
- 5 Stoffel K, Dieter U, Stachowiak G, Gächter A, Kuster MS. Biomechanical testing of the LCP—how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled?. Injury 2003; 34 (Suppl. 02) B11-B19
- 6 Beltran MJ, Collinge CA, Gardner MJ. Stress modulation of fracture fixation implants. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2016; 24 (10) 711-719
- 7 Perren SM. Physical and biological aspects of fracture healing with special reference to internal fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1979; (138) 175-196
- 8 Ahmad M, Nanda R, Bajwa AS, Candal-Couto J, Green S, Hui AC. Biomechanical testing of the locking compression plate: when does the distance between bone and implant significantly reduce construct stability?. Injury 2007; 38 (03) 358-364
- 9 Watrous GK, Moens NMM, Runciman J, Gibson TWG. Biomechanical properties of the 1.5 mm locking compression plate: comparison with the 1.5 and 2.0 mm straight plates in compression and torsion. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2018; 31 (06) 438-444
- 10 Evans A, Glyde M, Day R, Hosgood G. Effect of plate–bone distance and working length on 2.0-mm locking construct stiffness and plate strain in a diaphyseal fracture gap model: a biomechanical study. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2024; 37 (01) 1-7
- 11 Roberts JW, Grindel SI, Rebholz B, Wang M. Biomechanical evaluation of locking plate radial shaft fixation: unicortical locking fixation versus mixed bicortical and unicortical fixation in a sawbone model. J Hand Surg Am 2007; 32 (07) 971-975
- 12 Demner D, Garcia TC, Serdy MG, Hayashi K, Nir BA, Stover SM. Biomechanical comparison of mono- and bicortical screws in an experimentally induced gap fracture. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2014; 27 (06) 422-429
- 13 Demianiuk RM, Benamou J, Rutherford S, Beckett C, Ness MG, Déjardin LM. Effect of screw type and distribution on the torsional stability of 3.5 mm string of pearls locking plate constructs. Vet Surg 2015; 44 (01) 119-125
- 14 Grawe B, Le T, Williamson S, Archdeacon A, Zardiackas L. Fracture fixation with two locking screws versus three non-locking screws: a biomechanical comparison in a normal and an osteoporotic bone model. Bone Joint Res 2012; 1 (06) 118-124
- 15 Lee CH, Shih KS, Hsu CC, Cho T. Simulation-based particle swarm optimization and mechanical validation of screw position and number for the fixation stability of a femoral locking compression plate. Med Eng Phys 2014; 36 (01) 57-64
- 16 Pearson T, Glyde M, Hosgood G, Day R. The effect of intramedullary pin size and monocortical screw configuration on locking compression plate-rod constructs in an in vitro fracture gap model. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2015; 28 (02) 95-103
- 17 Bird G, Glyde M, Hosgood G, Hayes A, Day R. Effect of plate type and working length on a synthetic compressed juxta-articular fracture model. VCOT Open. 2020; 03 (02) e119-e128
- 18 Bird G, Glyde M, Hosgood G, Hayes A, Day R. Biomechanical comparison of a notched head locking T-plate and a straight locking compression plate in a juxta-articular fracture model. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2021; 34 (03) 161-170
- 19 Pearson T, Glyde MR, Day RE, Hosgood GL. The effect of intramedullary pin size and plate working length on plate strain in locking compression plate-rod constructs under axial load. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2016; 29 (06) 451-458
- 20 Watrous GK. Biomechanical Comparison of the 1.5mm Locking Compression Plate with the 1.5 and 2.0mm Mini-Cuttable Plates & Effect of Bone-Plate Distance on the Biomechanical Properties of the 1.5mm Locking Plate. Thesis presented to the University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada; 2016
- 21 Kandemir U, Augat P, Konowalczyk S, Wipf F, von Oldenburg G, Schmidt U. Implant material, type of fixation at the shaft, and position of plate modify biomechanics of distal femur plate osteosynthesis. J Orthop Trauma 2017; 31 (08) e241-e246
- 22 Liu W, Yang L, Kong X. et al. Stiffness of the locking compression plate as an external fixator for treating distal tibial fractures: a biomechanics study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2017; 18 (01) 26
- 23 Kowalski MJ, Schemitsch EH, Harrington RM, Chapman JR, Swiontkowski MF. A comparative biomechanical evaluation of a noncontacting plate and currently used devices for tibial fixation. J Trauma 1996; 40 (01) 5-9
- 24 Bilmont A, Palierne S, Verset M, Swider P, Autefage A. Biomechanical comparison of two locking plate constructs under cyclic torsional loading in a fracture gap model. Two screws versus three screws per fragment. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2015; 28 (05) 323-330
- 25 Palierne S, Blondel M, Swider P, Autefage A. Biomechanical comparison of use of two screws versus three screws per fragment with locking plate constructs under cyclic loading in compression in a fracture gap model. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2022; 35 (03) 166-174
- 26 Palierne S, Froidefond B, Swider P, Autefage A. Biomechanical comparison of two locking plate constructs under cyclic loading in four-point bending in a fracture gap model: two screws versus three screws per fragment. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2019; 32 (01) 59-66
- 27 Märdian S, Schaser KD, Duda GN, Heyland M. Working length of locking plates determines interfragmentary movement in distal femur fractures under physiological loading. Clin Biomech (Bristol) 2015; 30 (04) 391-396
- 28 Hoffmeier KL, Hofmann GO, Mückley T. Choosing a proper working length can improve the lifespan of locked plates. A biomechanical study. Clin Biomech (Bristol) 2011; 26 (04) 405-409
- 29 Cronier P, Pietu G, Dujardin C, Bigorre N, Ducellier F, Gerard R. The concept of locking plates. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2010; 96 (04) S17-S36
- 30 Ghimire S, Miramini S, Richardson M, Mendis P, Zhang L. Effects of dynamic loading on fracture healing under different locking compression plate configurations: a finite element study. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2019; 94: 74-85
- 31 Chao P, Lewis DD, Kowaleski MP, Pozzi A. Biomechanical concepts applicable to minimally invasive fracture repair in small animals. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2012; 42 (05) 853-872 , v
- 32 Chao CK, Chen YL, Wu JM, Lin CH, Chuang TY, Lin J. Contradictory working length effects in locked plating of the distal and middle femoral fractures—a biomechanical study. Clin Biomech (Bristol) 2020; 80: 105198
- 33 Hensley S, Christensen M, Small S, Archer D, Lakes E, Rogge R. Digital image correlation techniques for strain measurement in a variety of biomechanical test models. Acta Bioeng Biomech 2017; 19 (03) 187-195
- 34 Gilchrist S, Guy P, Cripton PA. Development of an inertia-driven model of sideways fall for detailed study of femur fracture mechanics. J Biomech Eng 2013; 135 (12) 121001
