Download PDF
Informationen aus Orthodontie & Kieferorthopädie 2009; 41(01): 63-73
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1098840
Fallbericht

Kieferorthopädische Behandlung behinderter Kinder

Orthodontic Treatment for the Special Needs Child
A. Becker
Centre for the Treatment of Craniofacial Disorders in Special Needs Children, Department of Orthodontics, Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Dental Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
,
J. Shapira
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Dental Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel.
,
S. Chaushu
Centre for the Treatment of Craniofacial Disorders in Special Needs Children, Department of Orthodontics, Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Dental Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Bei behinderten Personen treten Fehlbisslagen besonders häufig und besonders schwer auf. Bei vielen dieser Patienten gibt es medizinische ­Einschränkungen für die Durchführung der unter­schiedlichen Maßnahmen, die für eine ausgezeichnete kieferorthopädische Behandlung erforderlich sind. Fast alle haben mittelschwere bis schwere Verhaltensprobleme, die eine Behandlung erschweren und sogar unmöglich machen können. Dennoch sind die Eltern hoch motiviert, wünschen sich „das Beste für ihr Kind“ und sind bereit, zu einem integralen Bestandteil des Behandlungsteams zu werden. Der vorliegende Beitrag analysiert die damit verbundenen Schwierigkeiten und unterbreitet auf Grundlage der umfangreichen Erfahrungen der Verf. und der von ihnen veröffentlichten Berichte Vor­schläge, wie solche Schwierigkeiten umgangen werden können. Ein Schwerpunkt ist dabei der Einsatz von Medikamenten als Möglichkeit, therapeutischen Zugang zu vielen der schwierigeren Patienten zu erlangen. Anhand zweier Fall­beispiele werden schließlich viele der bei der ­Behandlung solcher Patienten wichtigen Prinzi­pien vorgeführt. 

Abstract

The prevalence and severity of malocclusion is especially high in special needs individuals. Many have medical limitations to the various proce­dures that are often needed in the pursuit of excellence from orthodontic treatment and almost all have moderate to severe behavioural problems that make treatment delivery difficult or even impossible to achieve, with any degree of reliability. Nevertheless, the parents are highly motivated to “do the best for their child” and are prepared to become integral members of the treatment deliv­ery team. The present article analyzes the difficulties involved and makes recommendations as to how these may be overcome, based on the authors’ published studies in this area and on their broad experience in treating these compromised individuals. Emphasis is placed on the use of pharmacological modalities as the means to providing therapeutic access to many of the more difficult patients. Two case reports are provided to illustrate many of the important principles that pertain to these cases. 

Schlüsselwörter

verhaltensauffällige behinderte Kinder - Medikation - kieferorthopädische Behandlung

Key words

special needs children - medication - orthodontic treatment


Publication History

Article published online:
17 March 2009

© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ˙ New York

 

  • Literatur

  • Waldman HB, Perlman SP, Swerdloff M. Orthodontics and the population with special needs.. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 118: 14-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Becker A, Shapira J. Orthodontics for the handicapped child.. Eur J Orthod 1996; 18: 55-67
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Sticker G. Psychological issues pertaining to malocclusion.. Am J Orthod 1970; 58: 276-283
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Lew KK. Attitudes and perceptions of adults towards orthodontic treatment in an Asian community.. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1993; 21: 31-35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Shaw WC, Addy M, Ray C. Dental and social effects of malocclusion and effectiveness of orthodontic treatment: a review.. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1980; 8: 36-45
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Shaw WC. The influence of children’s dentofacial appearance on their social attractiveness as judged by peers and lay adults.. Am J Orthod 1981; 79: 399-415
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Oreland A, Heijbel J, Jagell S. Malocclusions in physically and / or mentally handicapped children.. Swedish Dent J 1987; 11: 103-119
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen MM, Winer RA. Dental and facial characteristics in Down’s syndrome (mongolism).. J Dent Res 1965; 44 (Suppl.): 197-208
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Franklin DL, Luther F, Curzon ME. The prevalence of malocclusion in children with cerebral palsy.. Eur J Orthod 1996; 18: 637-643
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Proffit WR. Contemporary Orthodontics.. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book, Mosby Inc.; 1993: 12
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Shapira J, Chaushu S, Becker A. Prevalence of tooth transposition, third molar agenesis and maxillary canine impaction in individuals with Down syndrome.. Angle Orthod 2000; 70: 290-296
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Becker A. Orthodontics and the population with special needs.. Am J ­Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 119: 15A-16A [Readers’ Forum]
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Chaushu S, Becker A. Behaviour management needs for the orthodontic treatment of children with disabilities.. Eur J Orthod 2000; 22: 143-149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Shapira J, Becker A, Moskovitz M. The management of drooling problems in children with neurological dysfunction: a review and case report.. Spec Care Dentist 1999; 19: 181-185
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Becker A, Shapira J, Chaushu S. Orthodontic treatment for disabled children: motivation, expectation and satisfaction.. Eur J Orthod 2000; 22: 151-158
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Malamed SF. Sedation: a guide to patient management.. New York. Mosby Inc.; 1995: 22–31
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Fukuta O, Braham RL, Yanase H. et al The sedative effect of intranasal midazolam administration in the dental treatment of patients with mental disabilities: Part 1. The effect of a 0.2 mg / kg dose.. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1993; 17: 231-237
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Shapira J, Holan G, Botzer E. et al The effectiveness of midazolam and hydroxyzine as sedative agents for young pediatric dental patients.. ASDC J Dent Child 1996; 63: 421-425
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Jackson EF. Orthodontics and the retarded child.. Am J Orthod 1967; 53: 596-605
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Chadwick SM, Asher-McDade C. The orthodontic management of ­patients with profound learning disability.. Brit J Orthod 1997; 24: 117-125
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Chaushu S, Gozal D, Becker A. Intravenous sedation: an adjunct to enable orthodontic treatment for children with disabilities.. Eur J Orthod 2002; 24: 81-89
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Becker A, Shapira J, Chaushu S. Orthodontic treatment for disabled children – a survey of patient and appliance management.. J Orthod 2001; 28: 39-44
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Chaushu S, Zeltser R, Becker A. Safe orthodontic bonding for children with disabilities during general anaesthesia.. Eur J Orthod 2000; 22: 225-228
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Thomas RG. Indirect bonding: simplicity in action.. J Clin Orthod 1979; 13: 93-106
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Zeppieri IL, Chung CH, Mante FK. Effect of saliva on shear bond strength of an orthodontic adhesive used with moisture-insensitive and self-etching primers.. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 124: 414-419
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Thurow RC. Craniomaxillary orthopedic correction with en masse dental control.. Am J Orthod 1975; 68: 601-624
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Bass NM. Bass orthopedic appliance system. Part 1. Design and construction.. J Clin Orthod 1987; 21: 254-265
    PubMedGoogle Scholar