Ultraschall Med 2009; 30(5): 478-484
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1109488
Original Article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Real-Time Tissue Elastography Versus FibroScan for Noninvasive Assessment of Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Liver Disease

Real-time-Elastografie versus FibroScan zur nicht invasiven Beurteilung des Leberfibrosestadium bei chronischer LebererkrankungM. Friedrich-Rust1 , A. Schwarz2 , M. Ong3 , V. Dries4 , P. Schirmacher5 , E. Herrmann6 , P. Samaras7 , J. Bojunga1 , R. M. Bohle8 , S. Zeuzem1 , C. Sarrazin1
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine 1, J.-W.-Goethe-University Hospital
  • 2Faculty of Medicine, Saarland University
  • 3Institute of Medical Biometry, Epidemiology and Medical Informatics, Saarland University
  • 4Institute of Pathology, Mannheim
  • 5Institute of Pathology, University of Heidelberg
  • 6Institute of Biostatistics and Mathematical Modelling, Faculty of Medicine, J.-W.-Goethe-University
  • 7Department of Oncology, University Hospital Zurich
  • 8Department of Pathology, Saarland University Hospital
Further Information

Publication History

received: 21.12.2008

accepted: 3.5.2009

Publication Date:
07 October 2009 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Ziel: Die Transiente Elastografie (FibroScan, [TE]) und Serum-Fibrosemarker, wie der FibroTest (FT), sind inzwischen etablierte Verfahren zur nicht invasiven Beurteilung des Leberfibrosestadiums. Eine kürzlich publizierte Studie hat vergleichbare Ergebnisse der Real-time-Elastografie (HI-RTE) mit der transienten Elastografie aufgezeigt. Das Ziel der vorliegenden Studie war es, 1. die bisher publizierten Elastizitäts-Scores der Real-time-Elastografie in einer unabhängigen Patientengruppe zu validieren und 2. diese Ergebnisse mit der transienten Elastografie und dem FibroTest in Bezug auf die nicht invasive Beurteilung des Leberfibrosestadiums zu vergleichen. Material und Methoden: 134 Patienten mit chronischer Lebererkrankung und entweder einer histologischen Beurteilung des Leberfibrosestadiums (n = 112) oder einer gesicherten Leberzirrhose (n = 22) wurden in die Studie eingeschlossen. Alle Patienten erhielten TE, HI-RTE und eine Blutentnahme zur Bestimmung des FibroTests. Die Kalkulation des Elastizitäts-Scores der Real-time-Elastografie erfolgte in Anlehnung an die 2 bisher hierzu publizierten Studien. Ergebnisse: Es zeigte sich eine signifikante Korrelation der Transienten Elastografie, Real-time-Elastografie und des FibroTests jeweils mit dem histologischen Fibrosestadium nach Chevallier (r = 0,78, 0,34, und 0,67; p < 0,01). Die diagnostische Genauigkeit gemessen mit der Fläche unter der ROC-Kurve betrug jeweils 84 %, 69 % und 85 % für die Diagnose einer signifikanten Fibrose (F ≥ 2) und 95 %, 65 % und 83 % für die Diagnose einer Leberzirrhose. Schlussfolgerung: Die Real-time-Elastografie kann in ihrer aktuellen Form die Transiente Elastografie zur nicht invasiven Beurteilung des Leberfibrosestadiums nicht ersetzen.

Abstract

Purpose: Transient elastography (FibroScan, [TE]) and serum fibrosis markers such as the FibroTest (FT) are established methods for the noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis. A study using real-time elastography (HI-RTE), which is integrated in a conventional ultrasound system, was recently published with comparable results to transient elastography. The aim of the present study was to validate real-time elastography using the formulas calculated in previous studies and to compare the results to transient elastography and FibroTest for the noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis. Materials and Methods: One hundred and thirty-four patients with chronic liver disease and either histological assessment of liver fibrosis (n = 112) or proven liver cirrhosis (n = 22) were included in the study. All patients received TE, HI-RTE, and biochemical evaluation on the same day as presentation. The calculation of the elasticity score of real-time elastography was performed in accordance with the two previously published studies. Results: The Spearman correlation coefficient between transient elastography, real-time elastography and FibroTest with the histological Chevallier score was statistically significant with 0.78, 0.34, and 0.67, respectively (p < 0.01). The diagnostic accuracy expressed as areas under ROC curves was 0.84, 0.69 and 0.85 for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis (F ≥ 2), and 0.97, 0.65, and 0.83 for the diagnosis of cirrhosis, respectively. Conclusion: Real-time elastography in its present form cannot replace transient elastography for noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis.

References

  • 1 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement . Management of hepatitis C 2002 (June 10 – 12, 2002).  Hepatology. 2002;  36 S3-S20
  • 2 Castera L, Negre I, Samii K. et al . Pain experienced during percutaneous liver biopsy.  Hepatology. 1999;  30 1529-1530
  • 3 Bedossa P, Dargere D, Paradise V. Sampling variability of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C.  Hepatology. 2003;  38 1449-1457
  • 4 Maharaj B, Maharaj R J, Leary W P. et al . Sampling variability and its influence on the diagnostic yield of percutaneous needle biopsy of the liver.  Lancet. 1986;  1 523-525
  • 5 Friedrich-Rust M, Ong M F, Martens S. et al . Performance of transient elastography for the staging of liver fibrosis: a meta-analysis.  Gastroenterology. 2008;  134 960-974
  • 6 Talwalkar J A, Kurtz D M, Schoenleber S J. et al . Ultrasound-based transient elastography for the detection of hepatic fibrosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;  5 1214-1220
  • 7 Poynard T, Imbert-Bismut F, Munteanu M. et al . Overview of the diagnostic value of biochemical markers of liver fibrosis (FibroTest, HCV FibroSure) and necrosis (ActiTest) in patients with chronic hepatitis C.  Comp Hepatol. 2004;  23 8
  • 8 Shaheen A A, Wan A F, Myers R P. FibroTest and FibroScan for the Prediction of Hepatitis C-Related Fibrosis: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Test Accuracy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;  102 2589-2600
  • 9 Friedrich-Rust M, Ong M F, Herrmann E. et al . Real-time elastography for noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis in chronic viral hepatitis.  Am J Roentgenol. 2007;  188 758-764
  • 10 Tatsumi C, Kudo M, Ueshima K. et al . Noninvasive evaluation of hepatic fibrosis using serum fibrotic markers, transient elastography (FibroScan) and real-time tissue elastography.  Intervirology. 2008;  51 27-33
  • 11 Thein H H, Yi Q, Dore G J. et al . Estimation of stage-specific fibrosis progression rates in chronic hepatitis C virus infection: a meta-analysis and meta-regression.  Hepatology. 2008;  48 418-431
  • 12 Desmet V J, Gerber M, Hoofnagle J H. et al . Classification of chronic hepatitis: diagnosis, grading and staging.  Hepatology. 1994;  19 1513-1520
  • 13 Chevallier M, Guerret S, Chossegros P. et al . A histological semiquantitative scoring system for evaluation of hepatic fibrosis in needle liver biopsy specimens: comparisaon with morphometric studies.  Hepatology. 1994;  20 349-355
  • 14 Imbert-Bismut F, Messous D, Thibault V. et al . Intra-laboratory analytical variability of biochemical markers of fibrosis (Fibrotest) and activity (Actitest) and reference ranges in healthy blood donors.  Clin Chem Lab Med. 2004;  42 323-333
  • 15 Poynard T, Ratziu V, Naveau S. et al . The diagnostic value of biomarkers (SteatoTest) for the prediction of liver steatosis.  Comp Hepatol. 2005;  23 4-10
  • 16 Sandrin L, Fourquet B, Hasquenoph J M. et al . Transient elastography: a new noninvasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis.  Ultrasound Med Biol. 2003;  29 1705-1713
  • 17 Ophir J, Cespedes I, Ponnekanti H. et al . Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues.  Ultrason Imag. 1991;  13 111-114
  • 18 Frey H. Realtime-elastography. A new ultrasound procedure for the reconstruction of tissue elasticity.  Radiologe. 2003;  43 850-855
  • 19 DeLong E R, DeLong D M, Clarke-Pearson D L. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach.  Biometrics. 1988;  44 837-845
  • 20 Castera L, Vergniol J, Foucher J. et al . Prospective comparison of transient elastography, fibrotest, APRI, and liver biopsy for the assessment of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C.  Gastroenterology. 2005;  128 343-350
  • 21 Foucher J, Chanteloup E, Vergniol J. et al . Diagnosis of cirrhosis by transient elastography (Fibroscan): a prospective study.  Gut. 2006;  55 403-408
  • 22 Fraquelli M, Rigamonti C, Casazza G. et al . Reproducibility of transient elastography in the evaluation of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease.  Gut. 2007;  56 968-973
  • 23 Saftoui A, Gheonea D I, Ciurea T. Hue histogram analysis of real-time elastography images for noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis.  Am J Roentgenol. 2007;  189 W232-W233
  • 24 Gulizia R, Ferraioli G, Filice C. Open questions in the assessment of liver fibrosis using real-time elastography.  Am J Roentgenol. 2008;  190 W370-W371
  • 25 Liu H, Jiang Y X, Liu J B. et al . Evaluation of breast lesions with contrast-enhanced ultrasound using the microvascular imaging technique: initial observations.  Breast. 2008;  17 532-539
  • 26 Asteria C, Giovanardi A, Pizzocaro A. et al . US-elastography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules.  Thyroid. 2008;  18 523-531
  • 27 Konig K, Scheipers U, Pesavento A. et al . Initial experiences with real-time elastography guided biopsies of the prostate.  J Urol. 2005;  174 1-115
  • 28 Colli A, Fraquelli M, Andreoletti M. et al . Severe liver fibrosis or cirrhosis: accuracy of US for detection – analysis of 300 cases.  Radiology. 2003;  227 89-94
  • 29 Poynard T, Halfon P, Castera L. et al . Standardization of ROC Curve Areas for Diagnostic Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis Markers Based on Prevalences of Fibrosis Stages.  Clin Chem. 2007;  53 1615-1622

Dr. Mireen Friedrich-Rust

Department of Internal Medicine 1, J.-W.-Goethe-University Hospital

Theodor-Stern-Kai 7

60590 Frankfurt

Germany

Phone: ++ 49/69/63 01 52 97

Fax: ++ 49/69/63 01 51 22

Email: Mireen.Friedrich-Rust@kgu.de

    >