Z Gastroenterol 2009; 47(9): 830-845
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1109502
Übersicht

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Durchführung und Interpretation der Ösophagusmanometrie: Empfehlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaften für Neurogastroenterologie und Motilität (DGNM), für Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselerkrankungen (DGVS) und für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie (DGAV)

Performance and Interpretation of Esophageal Manometry: Recommendations of the German Societies for Neurogastroenterology and Motility (DGNM), for Digestive and Metabolic Diseases (DGVS) and for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV)J. Keller1 , I. van der Voort2 , C. Pehl3 , M. Nicolaus4 , J. Schirra4 , M. Fox5 , K. Fuchs6 , M. Storr7
  • 1Medizinische Klinik, Israelitisches Krankenhaus, Hamburg
  • 2Medizinische Klinik, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Virchow-Klinikum
  • 3Medizinische Klinik, Kreiskrankenhaus Vilsbiburg
  • 4Medizinische Klinik II – Großhadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
  • 5Klinik für Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Universitätsspital Zürich, Schweiz
  • 6Chirurgie, Markus-Krankenhaus, Frankfurt
  • 7Division of Gastroenterology, University of Calgary, Kanada
Further Information

Publication History

Manuskript eingetroffen: 24.3.2009

Manuskript akzeptiert: 26.4.2009

Publication Date:
11 September 2009 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Die Ösophagusmanometrie dient der Ableitung der Druckprofile des tubulären Ösophagus sowie seiner Sphinkteren in Ruhe sowie bei Schluckakten und spiegelt die kontraktile Aktivität der Speiseröhre wider. Sie gilt als Referenzverfahren zur Erfassung ösophagealer Motilitätsstörungen, wird aktuell aber in unterschiedlichen Zentren nicht einheitlich durchgeführt. Die vorliegende Arbeit gibt die Empfehlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaften für Neurogastroenterologie und Motilität (DGNM), für Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselerkrankungen (DGVS) und für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie (DGAV) zur konventionellen Ösophagusmanometrie wieder. Dargestellt werden Indikationen, praktische Durchführung und Analyse der Ösophagusmanometrie jeweils mit erläuternder Hintergrundinformation. Der Artikel soll einerseits erfahrenen Kollegen als umfassende Übersichtsarbeit dienen und andererseits Unerfahrenen konkrete Anleitungen zur Durchführung und Auswertung der konventionellen Ösophagusmanometrie an die Hand geben. Darüber hinaus werden auch Empfehlungen zum Einsatz neuerer bzw. ergänzender diagnostischer Verfahren, nämlich der Langzeit- und hochauflösenden Manometrie sowie Impedanzmessung, gegeben.

Abstract

Esophageal manometry examines the pressure profiles of the tubular esophagus and of the esophageal sphincters during resting conditions and in response to swallowing. It is regarded as the reference method for detection of esophageal motility disturbances but, up to date, performance of the procedure is not standardized among centers. This review depicts the recommendations of the German Societies for Neurogastroenterology and Motility, for Digestive and Metabolic Disturbances and for General and Visceral Surgery on indications, performance and analysis of conventional esophageal manometry. In addition to concise recommendations we give detailed background information so that the article can serve as a practical guideline for inexperienced investigators as well as an exensive review for the experienced one. Moreover, recommendations on the use of newer and/or supplementary diagnostic techniques, that is long-term and high resolution manometry as well as esophageal impedance measurements are also given.

Literatur

  • 1 Kronecker H, Meltzer S. Der Schluckmechanismus, seine Erregung und seine Hemmung.  Arch Anat Physiol. 1883;  Suppl 7 35
  • 2 Pandolfino J E, Kahrilas P J. AGA technical review on the clinical use of esophageal manometry.  Gastroenterology. 2005;  128 209-224
  • 3 Anderson S H, Yadegarfar G, Arastu M H. et al . The relationship between gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms and achalasia.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;  18 369-374
  • 4 Fibbe C, Layer P, Keller J. et al . Esophageal motility in reflux disease before and after fundoplication: a prospective, randomized, clinical, and manometric study.  Gastroenterology. 2001;  121 5-14
  • 5 Pehl C, Keller J, Merio R. et al . 24-Stunden-Ösophagus-pH-Metrie – Empfehlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurogastroenterologie und Motilität und der Arbeitsgruppe für gastrointestinale Funktionsdiagnostik der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie.  Z Gastroenterol. 2003;  41 545-556
  • 6 Passaretti S, Zaninotto G, Di Martino N. et al . Standards for oesophageal manometry. A position statement from the Gruppo Italiano di Studio Motilita Apparato Digerente (GISMAD).  Dig Liver Dis. 2000;  32 46-55
  • 7 Dent J, Dodds W J, Friedman R H. et al . Mechanism of gastroesophageal reflux in recumbent asymptomatic human subjects.  The Journal of clinical investigation. 1980;  65 256-267
  • 8 Murray J A, Clouse R E, Conklin J L. Components of the standard oesophageal manometry.  Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2003;  15 591-606
  • 9 Pehl C, Enck P, Franke A. et al . Empfehlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurogastroenterologie und Motilität, der Kommission Proktologie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Verdauungs und Stoffwechselkrankheiten, der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Koloproktologie und der Chirurgischen Arbeitsgruppe Colo-Proktologie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Visceralchirurgie zur anorektalen Manometrie im Erwachsenenalter.  Z Gastroenterol. 2007;  45 397-417
  • 10 Kahrilas P J, Clouse R E, Hogan W J. American Gastroenterological Association technical review on the clinical use of esophageal manometry.  Gastroenterology. 1994;  107 1865-1884
  • 11 Carmona-Sanchez R, Valerio-Urena J, Valdovinos-Diaz M A. Usefulness of gel lidocaine in esophageal manometry.  Revista de gastroenterologia de Mexico. 2001;  66 137-140
  • 12 Richter J, Wu W, Johns D. et al . Esophageal manometry in 95 healthy adult volunteers.  Dig Dis Sci. 1987;  32 583-592
  • 13 Clouse R E, Staiano A. Contraction abnormalities of the esophageal body in patients referred to manometry. A new approach to manometric classification.  Dig Dis Sci. 1983;  28 784-791
  • 14 Meyer G W, Gerhardt D C, Castell D O. Human esophageal response to rapid swallowing: muscle refractory period or neural inhibition?.  Am J Physiol. 1981;  241 G129-G136
  • 15 Sifrim D, Janssens J, Vantrappen G. A wave of inhibition precedes primary peristaltic contractions in the human esophagus.  Gastroenterology. 1992;  103 876-882
  • 16 Triadafilopoulos G, Tsang H P, Segall G M. Hot water swallows improve symptoms and accelerate esophageal clearance in esophageal motility disorders.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 1998;  26 239-244
  • 17 Ozdogan O, Saadalla A J, Emironal G. et al . Effect of intraluminal temperature on human oesophageal motor function.  Clinical physiology (Oxford, England). 1998;  18 504-509
  • 18 Edmundowicz S A, Clouse R E. Shortening of the esophagus in response to swallowing.  Am J Physiol. 1991;  260 G512-G516
  • 19 Bredenoord A J, Weusten B L, Timmer R. et al . Sleeve sensor versus high-resolution manometry for the detection of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations.  American journal of physiology. 2005;  288 G1190-G1194
  • 20 Fox M R, Bredenoord A J. Oesophageal high-resolution manometry: moving from research into clinical practice.  Gut. 2008;  57 405-423
  • 21 Dent J. A new technique for continuous sphincter pressure measurement.  Gastroenterology. 1976;  71 263-267
  • 22 Richter J E, Wu W C, Johns D N. et al . Esophageal manometry in 95 healthy adult volunteers. Variability of pressures with age and frequency of ”abnormal” contractions.  Dig Dis Sci. 1987;  32 583-592
  • 23 Meyer G W, Austin R M, Brady C E. et al . Muscle anatomy of the human esophagus.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 1986;  8 131-134
  • 24 Kahrilas P J, Dodds W J, Hogan W J. et al . Esophageal peristaltic dysfunction in peptic esophagitis.  Gastroenterology. 1986;  91 897-904
  • 25 Jalil S, Sperandio M, Tutuian R. et al . Are 10 wet swallows an appropriate sample of esophageal motility? Yes and no.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 2004;  38 30-34
  • 26 Johnston B T, Collins J S, McFarland R J. et al . A comparison of esophageal motility in response to bread swallows and water swallows.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;  88 351-355
  • 27 Keren S, Argaman E. Marshmallow for investigating functional disturbances of the esophageal body.  Harefuah. 1992;  123 161-165, 236
  • 28 Keren S, Argaman E, Golan M. Solid swallowing versus water swallowing: manometric study of dysphagia.  Dig Dis Sci. 1992;  37 603-608
  • 29 Howard P J, Maher L, Pryde A. et al . Systematic comparison of conventional oesophageal manometry with oesophageal motility while eating bread.  Gut. 1991;  32 1264-1269
  • 30 Pouderoux P, Shi G, Tatum R P. et al . Esophageal solid bolus transit: studies using concurrent videofluoroscopy and manometry.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;  94 1457-1463
  • 31 Tutuian R, Elton J P, Castell D O. et al . Effects of position on oesophageal function: studies using combined manometry and multichannel intraluminal impedance.  Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2003;  15 63-67
  • 32 Fox M, Menne D, Stutz B. et al . The effects of tegaserod on oesophageal function and bolus transport in healthy volunteers: studies using concurrent high-resolution manometry and videofluoroscopy.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;  24 1017-1027
  • 33 Meshkinpour H, Eckerling G. Unexplained dysphagia: viscous swallow-induced esophageal dysmotility.  Dysphagia. 1996;  11 125-128
  • 34 Bohn B, Bonaz B, Gueddah N. et al . Oesophageal motor and sensitivity abnormalities in non-obstructive dysphagia.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;  14 271-277
  • 35 Allen M L, Mellow M H, Robinson M. Manometry during food ingestion aids in the diagnosis of diffuse esophageal spasm.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1992;  87 568-571
  • 36 Schoeman M N, Holloway R H. Secondary oesophageal peristalsis in patients with non-obstructive dysphagia.  Gut. 1994;  35 1523-1528
  • 37 Williams R B, Wallace K L, Ali G N. et al . Biomechanics of failed deglutitive upper esophageal sphincter relaxation in neurogenic dysphagia.  American journal of physiology. 2002;  283 G16-G26
  • 38 Cook I J. Investigative techniques in the assessment of oral-pharyngeal dysphagia.  Dig Dis. 1998;  16 125-133
  • 39 Pal A, Williams R B, Cook I J. et al . Intrabolus pressure gradient identifies pathological constriction in the upper esophageal sphincter during flow.  American journal of physiology. 2003;  285 G1037-G1048
  • 40 Frieling T, Rühl A, Becker-Boost E. et al . Hygiene im Manometrielabor: Deutsche Multicenter-Studie. Hygiene im Manometrielabor.  Z Gastroenterol. 2004;  42 1
  • 41 Mittal R K, Bhalla V. Oesophageal motor functions and its disorders.  Gut. 2004;  53 1536-1542
  • 42 Liu J, Parashar V K, Mittal R K. Asymmetry of lower esophageal sphincter pressure: is it related to the muscle thickness or its shape?.  Am J Physiol. 1997;  272 G1509-G1517
  • 43 Kahrilas P J, Lin S, Chen J. et al . The effect of hiatus hernia on gastro-oesophageal junction pressure.  Gut. 1999;  44 476-482
  • 44 Goyal R K, Sangree M H, Hersh T. et al . Pressure inversion point at the upper high pressure zone and its genesis.  Gastroenterology. 1970;  59 754-759
  • 45 Holloway R H, Blank E L, Takahashi I. et al . Electrical control activity of the lower esophageal sphincter in unanesthetized opossums.  Am J Physiol. 1987;  252 G511-G521
  • 46 Boeckxstaens G E. The lower oesophageal sphincter.  Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2005;  17 Suppl 1 13-21
  • 47 Mittal R K, Rochester D F, McCallum R W. Effect of the diaphragmatic contraction on lower oesophageal sphincter pressure in man.  Gut. 1987;  28 1564-1568
  • 48 Bombeck C T, Dillard D H, Nyhus L M. Muscular anatomy of the gastroesophageal junction and role of phrenoesophageal ligament; autopsy study of sphincter mechanism.  Ann Surg. 1966;  164 643-654
  • 49 Wilson J A, Pryde A, Cecilia A. et al . Normal pharyngoesophageal motility. A study of 50 healthy subjects.  Dig Dis Sci. 1989;  34 1590-1599
  • 50 Biancani P, Goyal R K, Phillips A. et al . Mechanics of sphincter action. Studies on the lower esophageal sphincter.  The Journal of clinical investigation. 1973;  52 2973-2978
  • 51 Lydon S B, Dodds W J, Hogan W J. et al . The effect of manometric assembly diameter on intraluminal esophageal pressure recording.  The American journal of digestive diseases. 1975;  20 968-970
  • 52 Dodds W J, Stef J J, Hogan W J. Factors determining pressure measurement accuracy by intraluminal esophageal manometry.  Gastroenterology. 1976;  70 117-123
  • 53 O’Sullivan G C, DeMeester T R, Joelsson B E. et al . Interaction of lower esophageal sphincter pressure and length of sphincter in the abdomen as determinants of gastroesophageal competence.  Am J Surg. 1982;  143 40-47
  • 54 Lee J, Anggiansah A, Anggiansah R. et al . Effects of age on the gastroesophageal junction, esophageal motility, and reflux disease.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;  5 1392-1398
  • 55 Staiano A, Clouse R E. Detection of incomplete lower esophageal sphincter relaxation with conventional point-pressure sensors.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;  96 3258-3267
  • 56 Shi G, Ergun G A, Manka M. et al . Lower esophageal sphincter relaxation characteristics using a sleeve sensor in clinical manometry.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;  93 2373-2379
  • 57 Weihrauch T. Esophageal manometry, methods, and clinical practice. Baltimore; Urban&Schwarzenberg 1981
  • 58 Davison J S. Relaxation of the lower-oesophageal sphincter during swallowing.  Digestion. 1977;  15 73-76
  • 59 Marzio L, Grossi L, Falcucci M. et al . Increase of swallows before onset of phase III of migrating motor complex in normal human subjects.  Dig Dis Sci. 1996;  41 522-527
  • 60 Clouse R E, Hallett J L. Velocity of peristaltic propagation in distal esophageal segments.  Dig Dis Sci. 1995;  40 1311-1316
  • 61 Dantas R O, Aprile L R. Proximal and distal esophageal contractions in patients with vigorous or classic esophageal Chagas’ disease.  Arquivos de gastroenterologia. 2005;  42 9-12
  • 62 Agrawal A, Hila A, Tutuian R. et al . Clinical relevance of the nutcracker esophagus: suggested revision of criteria for diagnosis.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;  40 504-509
  • 63 Mujica V R, Mudipalli R S, Rao S S. Pathophysiology of chest pain in patients with nutcracker esophagus.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;  96 1371-1377
  • 64 Clouse R E, Staiano A. Topography of the esophageal peristaltic pressure wave.  Am J Physiol. 1991;  261 G677-G684
  • 65 Clouse R E, Staiano A. Topography of normal and high-amplitude esophageal peristalsis.  Am J Physiol. 1993;  265 G1098-G1107
  • 66 Clouse R E, Staiano A, Alrakawi A. Topographic analysis of esophageal double-peaked waves.  Gastroenterology. 2000;  118 469-476
  • 67 Grishaw E K, Ott D J, Frederick M G. et al . Functional abnormalities of the esophagus: a prospective analysis of radiographic findings relative to age and symptoms.  Am J Roentgenol. 1996;  167 719-723
  • 68 Rao S S, Gregersen H, Hayek B. et al . Unexplained chest pain: the hypersensitive, hyperreactive, and poorly compliant esophagus.  Ann Intern Med. 1996;  124 950-958
  • 69 Triadafilopoulos G, Castillo T. Nonpropulsive esophageal contractions and gastroesophageal reflux.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1991;  86 153-159
  • 70 Kahrilas P J, Dodds W J, Hogan W J. Effect of peristaltic dysfunction on esophageal volume clearance.  Gastroenterology. 1988;  94 73-80
  • 71 Tutuian R, Castell D O. Clarification of the esophageal function defect in patients with manometric ineffective esophageal motility: studies using combined impedance-manometry.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;  2 230-236
  • 72 Pandolfino J E, Ghosh S K, Lodhia N. et al . Utilizing intraluminal pressure gradients to predict esophageal clearance: a validation study.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;  103 1898-1905
  • 73 Singh S, Hamdy S. The upper oesophageal sphincter.  Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2005;  17 Suppl 1 3-12
  • 74 Ghosh S K, Pandolfino J E, Zhang Q. et al . Deglutitive upper esophageal sphincter relaxation: a study of 75 volunteer subjects using solid-state high-resolution manometry.  American journal of physiology. 2006;  291 G525-G531
  • 75 Herwaarden M A, Katz P O, Gideon R M. et al . Are manometric parameters of the upper esophageal sphincter and pharynx affected by age and gender?.  Dysphagia. 2003;  18 211-217
  • 76 Castell J A, Castell D O. Upper esophageal sphincter and pharyngeal function and oropharyngeal (transfer) dysphagia.  Gastroenterology clinics of North America. 1996;  25 35-50
  • 77 Herwaarden van M A, Samsom van M, Smout A J. Prolonged manometric recordings of oesophagus and lower oesophageal sphincter in achalasia patients.  Gut. 2001;  49 813-821
  • 78 Schoeman M N, Tippett M D, Akkermans L M. et al . Mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux in ambulant healthy human subjects.  Gastroenterology. 1995;  108 83-91
  • 79 Chitkara D K, Fortunato C, Nurko S. Prolonged monitoring of esophageal motor function in healthy children.  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2004;  38 192-197
  • 80 Bremner R M, Costantini M, DeMeester T R. et al . Normal esophageal body function: a study using ambulatory esophageal manometry.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;  93 183-187
  • 81 Stein H J, DeMeester T R. Indications, technique, and clinical use of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal motility monitoring in a surgical practice.  Ann Surg. 1993;  217 128-137
  • 82 Stein H J, DeMeester T R, Eypasch E P. et al . Ambulatory 24-hour esophageal manometry in the evaluation of esophageal motor disorders and noncardiac chest pain.  Surgery. 1991;  110 753-761
  • 83 Prassler R, Dormann A J, Vallentin J. et al . [Normal values for 24-hour manometry of the esophagus].  Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946). 1997;  122 1065-1069
  • 84 Awad R A, Camacho S. Reference values for stationary and 24-hour ambulatory esophageal manometry and pH data in Hispanic population.  Archives of medical research. 2003;  34 388-393
  • 85 Smout A J, Breedijk M, Zouw van der C. et al . Physiological gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal motor activity studied with a new system for 24-hour recording and automated analysis.  Dig Dis Sci. 1989;  34 372-378
  • 86 Adamek R J, Wegener M, Wienbeck M. et al . Long-term esophageal manometry in healthy subjects. Evaluation of normal values and influence of age.  Dig Dis Sci. 1994;  39 2069-2073
  • 87 Langevin S, DeNuna S F, Castell D O. Does diet affect values obtained during prolonged ambulatory pressure monitoring.  Dig Dis Sci. 1993;  38 225-232
  • 88 Di Martino N, Bortolotti M, Izzo G. et al . 24-hour esophageal ambulatory manometry in patients with achalasia of the esophagus.  Dis Esophagus. 1997;  10 121-127
  • 89 Netzer P, Gut A, Heer R. et al . Five-year audit of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH-manometry in clinical practice.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 1999;  34 676-682
  • 90 Stein H J. Clinical use of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal motility monitoring in patients with primary esophageal motor disorders.  Dysphagia. 1993;  8 105-111
  • 91 Barham C P, Gotley D C, Fowler A. et al . Diffuse oesophageal spasm: diagnosis by ambulatory 24 hour manometry.  Gut. 1997;  41 151-155
  • 92 Sifrim D, Holloway R. Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations: how many or how harmful?.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;  96 2529-2532
  • 93 Fox M, Hebbard G, Janiak P. et al . High-resolution manometry predicts the success of oesophageal bolus transport and identifies clinically important abnormalities not detected by conventional manometry.  Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2004;  16 533-542
  • 94 Clouse R E, Staiano A, Alrakawi A. et al . Application of topographical methods to clinical esophageal manometry.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;  95 2720-2730
  • 95 Tutuian R, Vela M F, Balaji N S. et al . Esophageal function testing with combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry: multicenter study in healthy volunteers.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;  1 174-182
  • 96 Tutuian R, Jalil S, Katz P O. et al . Effect of interval between swallows on oesophageal pressures and bolus movement in normal subjects – Studies with combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and oesophageal manometry.  Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2004;  16 23-29
  • 97 Nguyen H N, Domingues G R, Winograd R. et al . Relationship between bolus transit and LES-relaxation studied with concurrent impedance and manometry.  Hepatogastroenterology. 2006;  53 218-223
  • 98 Nguyen H N, Domingues G R, Winograd R. et al . Impedance characteristics of normal oesophageal motor function.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;  15 773-780
  • 99 Spechler S J, Castell D O. Classification of oesophageal motility abnormalities.  Gut. 2001;  49 145-151
  • 100 Silny J. Intraluminal multiple electric impedance procedure for measurement of gastrointestinal motility.  J Gastrointest Motil. 1991;  3 12
  • 101 Blom D, Mason E M. Esophageal bolus transport identified by simultaneous multichannel intraluminal impedance and manofluoroscopy.  Gastroenterology. 2001;  120 1
  • 102 Imam H, Sanmiguel C, Larive B. et al . Study of intestinal flow by combined videofluoroscopy, manometry, and multiple intraluminal impedance.  American journal of physiology. 2004;  286 G263-G270
  • 103 Imam H, Shay S, Ali A. et al . Bolus transit patterns in healthy subjects: a study using simultaneous impedance monitoring, videoesophagram, and esophageal manometry.  American journal of physiology. 2005;  288 G1000-G1006
  • 104 Conchillo J M, Selimah M, Bredenoord A J. et al . Assessment of oesophageal emptying in achalasia patients by intraluminal impedance monitoring.  Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2006;  18 971-977

PD Dr. Jutta Keller

Medizinische Klinik, Israelitisches Krankenhaus

Orchideenstieg 14

22297 Hamburg

Phone: ++ 49/40/51 12 50

Fax: ++ 49/40/5 11 25 50 45

Email: Keller@ik-h.de

    >