PDF herunterladen
Ultraschall Med 2010; 31(6): 564-570
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1109811
Originalarbeiten/Original Article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Detection and Characterization of Endoleaks Following Endovascular Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms using Contrast Harmonic Imaging (CHI) with Quantitative Perfusion Analysis (TIC) Compared to CT Angiography (CTA)

Detektion und Charakterisierung von Endoleaks nach endovaskulärer Behandlung abdomineller Aneurysmen mit Contrast Harmonic Imaging (CHI) mit quantitativer Perfusionsanalyse im Vergleich zur CTAE. M. Jung1 , J. Rennert1 , C. Fellner1 , W. Uller1 , W. Jung2 , A. Schreyer1 , P. Heiss1 , P. Hoffstetter1 , S. Feuerbach1 , P. Kasparzk3 , N. Zorger1 , K. Pfister3
  • 1Institut für Röntgendiagnostik, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg
  • 2Materialwissenschaften, Universität Saarbrücken
  • 3Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

received: 16.4.2009

accepted: 29.8.2009

Publikationsdatum:
25. November 2009 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Ziel: Zu überprüfen, inwieweit Contrast Harmonic Imaging (CHI) die Detektion von Endoleaks nach Endostenting von Aortenaneurysmen (BAA) ermöglicht. Material und Methoden: 51 Patienten mit Verdacht auf Endoleaks nach Endostent von Aneurysmen wurden mit CTA und Gefäßultraschall untersucht. Die von 2 Radiologen in Konsensus befundete Zweiphasen-CTA mit der in 8 Fällen durchgeführten selektiven Angiografie (DSA) dienten als Standardreferenz. Die Ultraschalluntersuchungen wurden von einem erfahrenen Untersucher mit einer Multifrequenz-Sonde (2 – 4 MHz) mit CHI nach Bolusinjektion von 2,4 ml SonoVue® (Maximum 5 ml) durchgeführt. Die Auswertung der Reperfusion des BAA mit der Time-Intensity-Curve(TIC)-Analyse erfolgte von 2 Auswertern im Konsensus. Ergebnisse: In 30 / 51 Fällen wurden Endoleaks durch CHI in Übereinstimmung mit der CTA nachgewiesen. In 20 Fällen fand sich kein Endoleak, korrelierend mit CTA/DSA. In einem Fall wurde ein kombiniertes Typ-I/II-Endoleak, gesichert durch DSA, mit CHI falsch als Typ-II-Leak charakterisiert. In einem Fall konnte primär ein Typ-II-Endoleak nur durch CHI, erst im Verlauf durch CTA nachgewiesen werden (Sens. 99 %, Spez. 93 %, NPV 99 %, PPV 95 %). Die TIC-Analyse ermöglichte in allen untersuchten Fällen eine Beurteilung der Perfusionsdynamik der Endoleaks. Dabei fanden sich signifikante Unterschiede (p < 0,05, Mann-Whitney-U-Test) der Perfusionswerte im Aneurysmasack bei lokaler Perfusion durch ein Endoleak (10,39 ± 4,29 dB) oder bei fehlendem Endoleak (6,42 ± 2,86 dB). Schlussfolgerung: Mit CHI mit Perfusionsanalyse gelingt eine sichere Detektion von Endoleaks. Nicht nur bei Kontraindikationen für die CTA bietet CHI eine Alternative für ein postinterventionelles Monitoring.

Abstract

Purpose: To show the feasibility of the detection of endoleaks following endovascular treatment of aortic aneurysms using contrast harmonic imaging (CHI) in comparison to computed tomography angiography (CTA). Materials and Methods: 51 patients with suspected endoleaks, who underwent previous endovascular treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysm, were examined using CTA and vascular ultrasound. Biphasic CTA in all cases and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in 8 patients were evaluated by two radiologists in consensus and served as the standard of reference. Ultrasound was performed by an experienced examiner with a multi-frequency linear transducer (2 – 4 MHz) using CHI following bolus injection of 2.4 ml of SonoVue® IV (maximum 5 ml). All images were evaluated by two observers in consensus regarding the reperfusion of the abdominal aneurysm using time intensity curve (TIC) analysis. Results: In 30 of 51 patients, endoleaks were detected concordantly in CHI and CTA. In 20 of 51 patients, no endoleak was found in CHI and CTA/DSA. In one patient, a type II endoleak could initially only be detected in CHI and was later confirmed in follow-up examinations by CTA (sens. 99 %, spec. 93 %, NPV 99 %, PPV 95 %). TIC analysis allowed evaluation of the perfusion dynamics of endoleaks in all patients. Significant differences were found (p < 0.05, Mann Whitney U Test) regarding the perfusion within the aneurysm when an endoleak was present (10.39 ± 4.29 dB) or not present (6.42 ± 2.86 dB). Conclusion: CHI with perfusion analysis allows definite detection of endoleaks, especially if contraindications for CTA are present. CHI presents an alternative for follow-up monitoring.

Key words

aorta - ultrasound - aneurysm

References

  • 1 Radu C N, Michineau S, Hidalgo A. et al . Validity of the sonographic measurement of the diameters of the ascending aorta in rats.  Ultraschall in Med. 2009;  nn Epub ahead of print
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Fleig A. Aneurysm of the thoracic aorta – three sections of the aorta in a single scan.  Ultraschall in Med. 2005;  26 447-448
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Dietrich C F. Comments and illustrations regarding the guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) – update 2008.  Ultraschall in Med. 2008;  29 S188-S202
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Claudon M, Cosgrove D, Albrecht T. et al . Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) – update 2008.  Ultraschall in Med. 2008;  29 28-44
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Hope T A, Zarins C K, Herfkens R J. Initial experience characterizing a type I endoleak from velocity profiles using time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI.  J Vasc Surg. 2009;  Epub ahead of print
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Iezzi R, Basilico R, Giancristofaro D. et al . Contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus color duplex ultrasound imaging in the follow-up of patients after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.  J Vasc Surg. 2009;  49 552-560
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Manning B J, O’Neill S M, Haider S N. et al . Duplex ultrasound in aneurysm surveillance following endovascular aneurysm repair: a comparison with computed tomography aortography.  J Vasc Surg. 2009;  49 60-65
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Gorlitzer M, Mertikian G, Trnka H. et al . Translumbar treatment of type II endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.  nteract Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2008;  7 781-784
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Kranokpiraksa P, Kaufman J A. Follow-up of endovascular aneurysm repair: plain radiography, ultrasound, CT/CT angiography, MR imaging/MR angiography, or what?.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008;  19 S27-S36
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Sternbergh 3 rd W C, Greenberg R K, Chuter T A. et al . Zenith Investigators. Redefining postoperative surveillance after endovascular aneurysm repair: recommendations based on 5-year follow-up in the US Zenith multicenter trial.  J Vasc Surg. 2008;  48 278-284
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Sandford R M, Bown M J, Sayers R D. et al . Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: 5-year follow-up results.  Ann Vasc Surg. 2008;  22 372-378
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Warrier R, Miller R, Bond R. et al . Risk factors for type II endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.  ANZ J Surg. 2008;  78 61-63
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Collins J T, Boros M J, Combs K. Ultrasound surveillance of endovascular aneurysm repair: a safe modality versus computed tomography.  Ann Vasc Surg. 2007;  21 671-675
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Tomlinson J, McNamara J, Matloubieh J. et al . Intermediate follow-up after endovascular aneurysm repair: can we forgo CT scanning in certain patients?.  Ann Vasc Surg. 2007;  21 663-670
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Collins J T, Boros M J, Combs K. Ultrasound surveillance of endovascular aneurysm repair: a safe modality versus computed tomography.  Ann Vasc Surg. 2007;  21 671-675
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Tomlinson J, McNamara J, Matloubieh J. et al . Intermediate follow-up after endovascular aneurysm repair: can we forgo CT scanning in certain patients?.  Ann Vasc Surg. 2007;  21 663-670
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Stavropoulos S W, Charagundla S R. Imaging techniques for detection and management of endoleaks after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.  Radiology. 2007;  243 641-655
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Sampaio S M, Shin S H, Panneton J M. et al . Intraoperative endoleak during EVAR: frequency, nature, and significance.  Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2009;  43 352-359
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Gelfand D V, White G H, Wilson S E. Clinical significance of type II endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.  Ann Vasc Surg. 2006;  20 69-74
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Giannoni M F, Fanelli F, Citone M. et al . Contrast ultrasound imaging: the best method to detect type II endoleak during endovascular aneurysm repair follow-up.  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2007;  6 359-362
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Kent K C, Faries P L. Treatment of type II endoleaks with a novel polyurethane thrombogenic foam: induction of endoleak thrombosis and elimination of intra-aneurysmal pressure in the canine model.  J Vasc Surg. 2005;  42 321-328
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Boks S S, Andhyiswara T, Smet A A. et al . Ultrasound-guided percutaneous transabdominal treatment of a type 2 endoleak.  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2005;  28 526-529
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Sarlon de G, Lapierre F, Sarlon E. et al . Endovascular aneurysm repair follow-up by unenhanced and contrast-enhanced duplex ultrasound.  J Mal Vasc. 2009;  34 34-43
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Clevert D A, Minaifar N, Weckbach S. et al . Color duplex ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in comparison to MS-CT in the detection of endoleak following endovascular aneurysm repair.  Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2008;  39 121-132
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Collins J T, Boros M J, Combs K. Ultrasound surveillance of endovascular aneurysm repair: a safe modality versus computed tomography.  Ann Vasc Surg. 2007;  21 671-675
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Carrafiello G, Recaldini C, Laganà D. et al . Endoleak detection and classification after endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm: value of CEUS over CTA.  Abdom Imaging. 2008;  33 357-362
    Google Scholar
  • 27 AbuRahma A F. Fate of endoleaks detected by CT angiography and missed by color duplex ultrasound in endovascular grafts for abdominal aortic aneurysms.  J Endovasc Ther. 2006;  13 490-495
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Carrafiello G, Laganà D, Recaldini C. et al . Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and computed tomography in classifying endoleaks after endovascular treatment of abdominal aorta aneurysms: preliminary experience.  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2006;  29 969-974
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Sun Z. Diagnostic value of color duplex ultrasonography in the follow-up of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006;  17 759-764
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Dill-Macky M J. Aortic endografts: detecting endoleaks using contrast-enhanced ultrasound.  Ultrasound Q. 2006;  22 49-52
    Google Scholar
  • 31 AbuRahma A F, Welch C A, Mullins B B. et al . Computed tomography versus color duplex ultrasound for surveillance of abdominal aortic stent-grafts.  J Endovasc Ther. 2005;  12 568-573
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Ashoke R, Brown L C, Rodway A. et al . Color duplex ultrasonography is insensitive for the detection of endoleak after aortic endografting: a systematic review.  J Endovasc Ther. 2005;  12 297-305
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Jung E M, Clevert D A, Schreyer A G. et al . Evaluation of quantitative contrast harmonic imaging to assess malignancy of liver tumors: A prospective controlled two-center study.  World J Gastroenterol. 2007;  13 6356-6364
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Chaer R A, Trocciola S, DeRubertis B. et al . Evaluation of the accuracy of a wireless pressure sensor in a canine model of retrograde-collateral (type II) endoleak and correlation with histologic analysis.  J Vasc Surg. 2006;  44 1306-1313
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Sandford R M, Bown M J, Fishwick G. et al . Duplex ultrasound scanning is reliable in the detection of endoleak following endovascular aneurysm repair.  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006;  32 537-541
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Henao E A, Hodge M D, Felkai D D. et al . Contrast-enhanced Duplex surveillance after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: improved efficacy using a continuous infusion technique.  J Vasc Surg. 2006;  43 259-264
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Bargellini I, Cioni R, Petruzzi P. et al . Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: analysis of aneurysm volumetric changes at mid-term follow-up.  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2005;  28 426-433
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Noll R E, Tonnessen B H, Mannava Jr K. et al . Long-term postplacement cost after endovascular aneurysm repair.  J Vasc Surg. 2007;  46 9-15
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Clevert D A, Kopp R. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for endovascular grafting in infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm in a single patient with risk factors for the use of iodinated contrast.  J Vasc Interv Rad. 2008;  19 1241-1245
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Giesel F L, Delorme S, Sibbel R. et al . Kontrastverstärkter Ultraschall zur Charakterisierung von inzidentellen Leberläsionen – eine ökonomische Betrachtung im Vergleich zur Mehrphasencomputertomographie.  Ultraschall in Med. 2009;  30 259-268
    Google Scholar

Dr. med. Ernst Michael Jung

Institut für Röntgendiagnostik, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg

Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11

93053 Regensburg

Telefon: ++ 49/9 41/9 44 74 01

Fax: ++ 49/9 41/9 44 74 09

eMail: emjung@gmx.de

      >