manuelletherapie 2009; 13(5): 190-198
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1109940
Originalarbeit

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Klinisches Muster der klinisch lumbalen Instabilität[1]

Systematischer ReviewClinical Pattern of Clinical Lumbar InstabilitySystematic ReviewA. Mannig1
  • 1 medbase, CH-Winterthur
Further Information

Publication History

Manuskript eingetroffen: 26.2.2009

Manuskript akzeptiert: 25.5.2009

Publication Date:
05 January 2010 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Die klinisch lumbale Instabilität stellt eine Subgruppe der unspezifischen lumbalen Rückenschmerzen dar. Auf der Basis der aktuellen Literatur wird dieses klinische Muster nach dem Schema einer physiotherapeutischen Untersuchung beschrieben, die subjektive und objektive Zeichen sowie Tests beinhaltet. In der Praxis ist das gängigste Mittel zur Ermittlung der Aktivität der tiefen lumbalen Stabilisatoren das Biofeedback-Gerät (PBU). Die passiven Untersuchungstechniken (PAIVM und PPIVM) spielen bei der Differenzierung zur strukturellen Instabilität eine wichtige Rolle.

Wegen der dürftigen Reliabilität der segmentalen Beweglichkeitsmessung sollten die Ergebnisse der passiven Tests immer im Kontext mit den aktiven Tests und den subjektiven Merkmalen gesehen werden. Die in der alltäglichen Praxis einfach anzuwendenden aktiven Tests weisen eine gute Reliabilität auf.

Abstract

Clinical lumbar instability represents a subgroup of unspecific lumbar back pain. On the basis of current literature this clinical pattern is described according to a physiotherapeutic examination scheme including subjective and objective signs as well as tests. A well-established practical tool in order to measure the activity of deep lumbar stabilisers is the biofeedback instrument (PBU). Passive examination techniques (PAIVM and PPIVM) play a vital role for the differentiation from structural instability.

Due to the poor reliability of segmental movement measurement passive tests results should always be seen in context with active tests and subjective characteristics. The in daily practice easily implementable active tests show good reliability.

1 Die Arbeit wurde im Rahmen der SVOMP-OMT-Ausbildung 2006 – 2008 erstellt.

Literatur

  • 1 Abbott J H, McCane B, Herbison P. et al . Lumbar segmental instability: a criterion-related validity study of manual therapy assessment.  BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2005;  6 56 DOI: 10.1186 / 1471 – 2474 – 6-56
  • 2 Abbott J H, Fritz J M, McCane B. et al . Lumbar segmental mobility disorders: comparison of two methods of defining abnormal displacement kinematics in a cohort of patients with non-specific mechanical low back pain.  BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2006;  7 45 DOI: 10.1186 / 1471 – 2474-7-45
  • 3 Airaksinen O, Hildebrandt J, Manninon A F. et al .European Guidelines for the management of chronic non-specific low back pain. 2004 www.backpaineurope.org/web/files/WG2_Guidelines.pdf
  • 4 Bergmark A. Stability of the lumbar spine.  Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 1989;  230 18-53
  • 5 Billis E V, Foster N E, Wright C C. Reproducibility and repeatability: errors of three groups of physiotherapists in location spinal levels by palpation.  Manual Therapy. 2003;  8 223-232
  • 6 Comerford M J, Mottram S L. Functional stability re-training: principles and strategies for managing mechanical dysfunction. Masterclass.  Manual Therapy. 2001;  6 3-14
  • 7 Comerford M J, Mottram S L. Movement and stability dysfunction – contemporary developments.  Manual Therapy. 2001;  6 15-26
  • 8 Cook C, Brismée J M, Sizer P S. Subjective and objective descriptors of clinical lumbar spine instability: A delphi study.  Manual Therapy. 2006;  11 11-21
  • 9 Dankaerts W, O’Sullivan P B, Straker L M. et al . The inter-examiner reliability of a classification method for non-specific chronic low back pain patients with motor control impairment.  Manual Therapy. 2005;  10 28-39
  • 10 Descarreaux M, Blouin J S, Teasdale N. Repositioning accuracy and movement parameters in low back pain subjects and healthy control subjects.  Eur Spine J. 2005;  14 185-191
  • 11 Van Dillen L R, Sahrmann S A, Norton B J. et al . Reliability of physical examination items used for classification of patients with low back pain.  Physical Therapy. 1998;  78 979-988
  • 12 Van Dillen L R, Sahrmann S A, Norton B J. et al . The effect of modifying patient-referred spinal movement and alignment during symptom testing in patients with low back pain: a preliminary report.  Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2003;  84 313-322
  • 13 Dupuis P R, Yong-Hing K, Cassidy J D. et al . Radiologic diagnosis of degenerative lumbar spinal instability.  Spine. 1985;  10 262-276
  • 14 French S D, GreenS, Forbes A. Reliability of chiropractic methods commonly used to detect manipulable lesions in patients with chronic low back pain.  Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 2000;  23 231-238
  • 15 Fritz M J, Erhard R E, Hagen B F. Segmental instability of the lumbar spine.  Physical Therapy. 1998;  78 889-896
  • 16 Fritz J M, Piva S R, Childs J D. Accuracy of the clinical examination to predict radiographic instability of the lumbar spine.  European Spine Journal. 2003;  14 743-750
  • 17 Fritz J M, Whitman J M, Childs J D. Lumbar spine segmental mobility assessment: An examination of validity for determining intervention strategies in patients with low back pain.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;  86 1745-1752
  • 18 Hestboek L, Leboeuf-Yde C. Are chiropractic tests fort he lumbo-pelvic spine reliable and valid? A systematic critical literature review.  Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 2000;  23 258-275
  • 19 Hicks G E, Fritz J M, Delitto A. Mishock J.  Interrater reliability of clinical examination measures for identification of lumbar segmental instability, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2003;  84 1858-1864
  • 20 Johansson F. Interexaminer reliability of lumbar segmental mobility tests.  Manual Therapy. 2005;  10 331-336
  • 21 Luomajoki H, Kool J, Bruin de E. et al . Reliability of movement control tests in the lumbar spine.  BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2007;  8 90 DOI: 10.1186 / 1471-2474-8-90
  • 22 Luomajoki H, Kool J, Bruin de E. et al .Specificity of movement control tests of low back: a validation study. Low Back and Pelvic Pain Congress Barcelona; 2007
  • 23 Maitland G D. Manipulation der Wirbelsäule. Heidelberg; Springer 2005 3. Aufl
  • 24 Maluf K S, Sahrmann S A, Dillen L R. Use of a classification system guide nonsurgical management of a patient with chronic low back pain.  Physical Therapy. 2000;  80 1079-1111
  • 25 Nachemson A L. Advances in low-back pain.  Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1985;  200 266-278
  • 26 Nachemson van A. Lumbar spine instability.  Spine. 1995;  10 290-291
  • 27 Németh J. Aktive Bewegungstests zur Evaluation der klinischen LWS-Instabilität.  Manuelle Therapie. 2008;  12 14-24
  • 28 O’Sullivan P B, Twomey L T, Allison G T. Evaluation of specific stabilizing exercise in the treatment of low back pain with radiologic diagnosis of spondylolysis or spondylosisthesis.  Spine. 1997;  22 2959-2967
  • 29 O’Sullivan P B. Lumbar segmental „instability”: clinical presentation and specific stabilizing exercise management.  Manual Therapy. 2000;  5 2-12
  • 30 O’Sullivan P B, Burnett A, Floyd A N. et al . Lumbar repositioning deficit in a specific low back pain population.  Spine. 2003;  28 1074-1079
  • 31 O’Sullivan P B. „Clinical Instability” of the lumbar spine: it’s pathological basis, diagnosis, and conservative management. Boyling J, Jull G Grieve’s modern manual therapy. The vertebral column Edinburgh; Elsevier 2004 3rd ed
  • 32 O’Sullivan P B. Diagnosis and classification of chronic low back pain disorders: Maladaptive movement and motor control impairments as underlying mechanism.  Manual Therapy. 2005;  10 242-255
  • 33 Ogon M, Bender B R, Hooper D M. et al . A dynamic approach to spinal instability. Part II: Hesitation and giving-way during interspinal motion.  Spine. 1997;  22 2859-2866
  • 34 Panjabi M M. The stabilizing system of the spine. Part 1: Function, dysfunction, adaption and enhancement.  Journal of Spinal Disorders. 1992;  4 383-389
  • 35 Panjabi M M. The stabilizing system of the spine. Part 2: Neutral zone and instability hypothesis.  Journal of Spinal Disorders. 1992;  4 390-397
  • 36 Panjabi M M. Clinical spinal instability and low back pain.  Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2003;  13 371-379
  • 37 Paris S. Physical signs of instability.  Spine. 1985;  10 277-279
  • 38 Petersen T, Olsen S, Laslett M. et al . Inter-tester reliability of a new diagnostic classification system for patients with non-specific low back pain.  Australian Journal of Physiotherapy. 2004;  50 85-94
  • 39 Richardson C A, Jull G A, Hodges P W. et al .Therapeutic exercise for spinal segmental stabilisation in low back pain. Edinburgh; Churchill Livingstone 1999 2nd ed
  • 40 Sahrmann S A. Diagnosis and Treatment of Movement Impairment Syndromes. St. Louis; Mosby 2002
  • 41 Schöttker-Königer T. Angewandte Physiologie. 3: Therapie, Training, Tests. Stuttgart; Thieme 2001
  • 42 Seffinger M A, Najm W I, Mishra S I. et al . Reliability of spinal palpation for diagnosis of back and neck pain.  Spine. 2004;  29 E413-E425
  • 43 Stochkendahl M J, Christensen H W, Hartvigsen J. et al . Manual examination of the spine: a systematic critical literature review of reproducibility.  Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 2006;  29 475-486
  • 44 Strender L E, Sjöblom A, Sundell K. et al . Interexaminer reliability in physical examination of patients with low back pain.  Spine. 1997;  22 814-820
  • 45 Taylor J, O’Sullivan P B. 2007. 
  • 46 Tom-Petersen. et al . 2004. 
  • 47 Trijffel E, Anderegg Q, Bossuyt P MM. et al . Interexaminer reliability of passive assessment of intervertebral motion in the cervical and lumbar spine: A systematic review.  Manual Therapy. 2005;  10 256-269
  • 48 Van Tulder M, Becker A, Bekkering T. et al .European Guidelines for the management of acute nonspecific low back pain in primary care. 1998 www.backpaineurope.org/web/files/WG1_Guidelines.pdf
  • 49 Waddell G. Back pain revolution. Edinburgh; Churchill Livingstone 2004 2nd ed
  • 50 White L J, Thomas J S. The rater reliability of assessments of symptom provocation in patients with low back pain.  Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation. 2002;  16 83-90

1 Die Arbeit wurde im Rahmen der SVOMP-OMT-Ausbildung 2006 – 2008 erstellt.

Angelika Mannig

medbase

Brunngasse 6

8400 Winterthur

Schweiz

Email: amannig@gmx.ch

    >