Functional Outcome in the Neurosurgical Patient and Its Impact on Quality of Life

ABSTRACT

Outcomes research has become an integral part of most clinical studies today. Extent of resection, increased median survival, and “time to progression” are no longer the only important end points in need of assessment. Identifying the long-term adverse effects of treatment has become increasingly important as patients try to resume previous activities and an independent lifestyle. The measurement of functional states and health-related quality of life issues are at the forefront of medicine and have become necessary measures of functional outcome following the treatment of a variety of medical and surgical disorders. In this article, we review the most recent studies on the functional outcome of patients undergoing neurological surgeries and its impact on quality of life.

Quality of life - skull base surgery - meningioma - acoustic neuroma - paranasal sinus malignancy - craniofacial surgery

REFERENCES

• 1 World Health Organization Constitution .1948
• 2 Mohsenipour I, Deusch E, Gabl M, Hofer M, Twerdy K. Quality of life in patients after meningioma resection.  Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2001;  143 547-553
• 3 DeMonte F. Functional outcomes in skull base surgery.  Clin Neurosurg. 2000;  48 340-350
• 4 Meyers CA. Issues of quality of life in neuro-oncology. In: Vecht CJ Handbook of Clinical Neurology 23, Neuro-Oncology Part 1. Brain Tumors: Principles of Biology, Diagnosis and Therapy. Amsterdam; Elsevier Science 1997: 389-409
• 5 Wiegand D A, Fickel V. Acoustic neuroma—the patient's perspective: subjective assessment of symptoms, diagnosis, therapy, and outcome in 541 patients.  Laryngoscope. 1989;  99 179-187
• 6 Nikolopoulos T P, Johnson I, O'Donoghue G M. Quality of life after acoustic neuroma surgery.  Laryngoscope. 1998;  108 1382-1385
• 7 da Cruz M J, Moffat D A, Hardy D G. Postoperative quality of life in vestibular schwannoma patients measured by the SF36 Health Questionnaire.  Laryngoscope. 2000;  110 151-155
• 8 Irving R M, Beynon G J, Viani L, Hardy D G, Baguley D M, Moffat D A. The patient's perspective after vestibular schwannoma removal: quality of life and implications for management.  Am J Otol. 1995;  16 331-337
• 9 Nicoucar K, Momjian S, Vader J P, De Tribolet N. Surgery for large vestibular schwannomas: how patients and surgeons perceive quality of life.  J Neurosurg. 2006;  105 205-212
• 10 Myrseth E, Møller P, Wentzel-Larsen T, Goplen F, Lund-Johansen M. Untreated vestibular schwannomas: vertigo is a powerful predictor for health-related quality of life.  Neurosurgery. 2006;  59 67-76 discussion 67-76
• 11 Gil Z, Abergel A, Spektor S et al.. Quality of life following surgery for anterior skull base tumors.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;  129 1303-1309
• 12 Gil Z, Abergel A, Spektor S, Shabtai E, Khafif A, Fliss D M. Development of a cancer-specific anterior skull base quality-of-life questionnaire.  J Neurosurg. 2004;  100 813-819
• 13 Gil Z, Abergel A, Spektor S, Khafif A, Fliss D M. Patient, caregiver, and surgeon perceptions of quality of life following anterior skull base surgery.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;  130 1276-1281
• 14 Kelleher M O, Fernandes M F, Sim D W, O'Sullivan M G. Health-related quality of life in patients with skull base tumours.  Br J Neurosurg. 2002;  16 16-20
• 15 Lang D A, Neil-Dwyer G, Garfield J. Outcome after complex neurosurgery: the caregiver's burden is forgotten.  J Neurosurg. 1999;  91 359-363
• 16 Winston K R. Hair and neurosurgery.  Neurosurgery. 1992;  31 320-329
• 17 Weinberg D B, Gittell J H, Lusenhop R W, Kautz C M, Wright J. Beyond our walls: impact of patient and provider coordination across the continuum on outcomes for surgical patients.  Health Serv Res. 2007;  42(1 Pt 1) 7-24
• 18 Weinberg D B, Lusenhop R W, Gittell J H, Kautz C M. Coordination between formal providers and informal caregivers.  Health Care Manage Rev. 2007;  32 140-149