ABSTRACT
The detection and quantification of factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors is clinically important
both for the identification of hemophilia A patients with inhibitors and for the management
of immune tolerance treatment. Only limited data are available on the between-laboratory
variation of FVIII inhibitor testing. This report describes the evaluation of the
results of the large-scale external quality assessment program of the European Concerted
Action on Thrombosis Foundation. This study includes the results of six different
surveys for the period 2006 to 2008 with 100 to 170 participating laboratories. The
overall between-laboratory variation ranged from 28% to 52% with a slightly lower
variation for the Nijmegen assay (~39%) on average than for the Bethesda assay (~45%).
The use of buffered normal pooled plasma as FVIII source showed better performance
compared with the use of nonbuffered pooled plasma; likewise the use of FVIII-deficient
plasma compared with the use of imidazole buffer. However, the combination of both
was essential for lowest between-laboratory variation. The Nijmegen assay also showed
better performance with respect to specificity and sensitivity than the Bethesda assay,
although the results for neither were entirely satisfactory. In general, it can be
concluded that the measurement of FVIII inhibitory antibodies with the Nijmegen assay
should be favored over the use of the Bethesda assay. However, further improvement
of the laboratory test for FVIII inhibitors is urgently needed.
KEYWORDS
Between-laboratory variation - factor VIII inhibitors - Bethesda assay - Nijmegen
assay
REFERENCES
- 1
Wight J, Paisley S.
The epidemiology of inhibitors in haemophilia A: a systematic review.
Haemophilia.
2003;
9(4)
418-435
- 2
Kasper C K, Aledort L, Aronson D et al..
Proceedings: a more uniform measurement of factor VIII inhibitors.
Thromb Diath Haemorrh.
1975;
34(2)
612
- 3
Verbruggen B, Novakova I, Wessels H, Boezeman J, van den Berg M, Mauser-Bunschoten E.
The Nijmegen modification of the Bethesda assay for factor VIII:C inhibitors: improved
specificity and reliability.
Thromb Haemost.
1995;
73(2)
247-251
- 4
Giles A R, Verbruggen B, Rivard G E, Teitel J, Walker I. Association of Hemophilia
Centre Directors of Canada. Factor VIII/IX Subcommittee of Scientific and Standardization
Committee of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis .
A detailed comparison of the performance of the standard versus the Nijmegen modification
of the Bethesda assay in detecting factor VIII:C inhibitors in the haemophilia A population
of Canada.
Thromb Haemost.
1998;
79(4)
872-875
- 5 Verbruggen B, Novakova I, van Heerde W.
Detecting and qualifying functional inhibitors in hemostasis. In: Kitchen S, Olson JD, Preston EF Quality in Laboratory Hemostasis and Thrombosis. Oxford,
United Kingdom; Blackwell 2009: 198-207
- 6
Reber G, Aurousseau M H, Dreyfus M et al..
Inter-laboratory variability of the measurement of low titer factor VIII:C inhibitor
in haemophiliacs: improvement by the Nijmegen modification of the Bethesda assay and
the use of common lyophilized plasmas.
Haemophilia.
1999;
5(4)
292-293
- 7
Favaloro E J, Bonar R, Duncan E RCPA QAP in Haematology Haemostasis Committee et al.
Identification of factor inhibitors by diagnostic haemostasis laboratories: a large
multi-centre evaluation.
Thromb Haemost.
2006;
96(1)
73-78
- 8
Peerschke E I, Castellone D D, Ledford-Kraemer M, Van Cott E M, Meijer P. NASCOLA
Proficiency Testing Committee .
Laboratory assessment of factor VIII inhibitor titer: the North American Specialized
Coagulation Laboratory Association experience.
Am J Clin Pathol.
2009;
131(4)
552-558
- 9
van den Brink E N, Turenhout E A, Bank C M, Fijnvandraat K, Peters M, Voorberg J.
Molecular analysis of human anti-factor VIII antibodies by V gene phage display identifies
a new epitope in the acidic region following the A2 domain.
Blood.
2000;
96(2)
540-545
- 10
Bland J M, Altman D G.
Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.
Lancet.
1986;
1(8476)
307-310
- 11
Bland J M, Altman D G.
Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method
is misleading.
Lancet.
1995;
346(8982)
1085-1087
- 12
Verbruggen B, van Heerde W, Novákovà I, Lillicrap D, Giles A.
A 4% solution of bovine serum albumin may be used in place of factor VIII:C deficient
plasma in the control sample in the Nijmegen modification of the Bethesda factor VIII:C
inhibitor assay.
Thromb Haemost.
2002;
88(2)
362-364
- 13
Verbruggen B, Meijer P, Novákova I, Van Heerde W.
Diagnosis of factor VIII deficiency.
Haemophilia.
2008;
14(suppl 3)
76-82
- 14
Mariani G, Siragusa S, Kroner B L.
Immune tolerance induction in hemophilia A: a review.
Semin Thromb Hemost.
2003;
29(1)
69-76
- 15
Smith O P.
Recombinant factor VIIa in the management of surgery and acute bleeding episodes in
children with haemophilia and high-responding inhibitors.
Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb.
2002;
32(Suppl 1)
22-25
Piet MeijerPh.D.
P.O. Box 30, 2300 AA Leiden
The Netherlands
Email: P.Meijer@ecat.nl