Ultraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound, Table of Contents Ultraschall Med 2010; 31(6): 614-615DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1245803 Leserbrief/Letter to the Editor© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New YorkBemerkungen zu: Revision der DEGUM Kriterien zur Graduierung von Stenosen der A. carotis internaE. StolzRecommend Article Abstract Buy Article(opens in new window) Full Text References Literatur 1 Arning C, Widder B, Reutern G M et al. Ultraschallkriterien zur Graduierung von Stenosen der A. carotis interna - Revision der DEGUM-Kriterien und Transfer in NASCET-Stenosierungsgrade. Ultraschall in Med. 2010; 31 251-257 2 Rothwell P M, Gibson R J, Slattery von J et al. Equivalence of measurements of carotid stenosis. A comparison of three methods on 1001 angiograms. European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Stroke. 1994; 25 2435-2439 3 Grant E G, Benson C B, Moneta G L et al. Carotid artery stenosis: gray scale and Doppler US diagnosis – Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference. Radiology. 2003; 229 340-346 4 Staikov I N, Nedeltchev K, Arnold M et al. Duplex sonographic criteria for measuring carotid stenoses. J Clin Ultrasound. 2002; 30 275-281 5 Staikov I N, Arnold M, Mattle H P et al. Comparison of the ECST, CC, and NASCET grading methods and ultrasound for assessing carotid stenosis. J Neurol. 2000; 247 681-686 6 Widder B, Reutern G M, Neuerburg-Heusler von D. Morphologische und dopplersonographische Kriterien zur Bestimmung von Stenosierungsgraden an der A. carotis interna. Ultraschall in Med. 1986; 7 70-75 7 Latchaw R E, Alberts M J, Lev M H et al. Recommendations for imaging of acute ischemic stroke. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke. 2009; 40 3646-3678 8 Bland J M, Altman D G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet,. 1986; 1 307-310
