Operative Therapie der unikompartimentellen Gonarthrose – Resultate einer bundesweiten Umfrage für das Jahr 2008

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund: Trotz guter Langzeitresultate der primären Knieendoprothetik gilt es in der Regel, gerade bei jüngeren Patienten den Gelenkersatz soweit als möglich hinauszuzögern. Ziel der vorliegenden, bundesweiten Umfrage an deutschen orthopädischen und unfallchirurgischen Kliniken war es, für das Jahr 2008 die Daten hinsichtlich der jeweiligen operativen Behandlung der unikompartimentellen Gonarthrose (UKG) zu erfragen. Material und Methoden: 220 orthopädische und 230 unfallchirurgische Kliniken wurden von Mai bis August 2009 mittels eines anonymisierten Fragebogens bezüglich ihrer operativen Behandlungsstrategien bei oben genanntem Krankheitsbild befragt. Explizit wurden Daten zu arthroskopischen Verfahren, kniegelenknahen Korrekturosteotomien und endoprothetischen Verfahren erhoben. Ergebnisse: Bei einer Responderrate von 51,1 % wurden von den 230 antwortenden Kliniken insgesamt 76 028 Eingriffe bei unikompartimenteller Gonarthrose bei Patienten zwischen 30 und 60 Jahren durchgeführt. An erster Stelle standen dabei Arthroskopien (50,4 %), gefolgt von Knieendoprothesen (43,4 %, davon 87,3 % bikondylärer Oberflächenersatz, 12,3 % Schlittenprothesen, 0,4 % tibiale Hemiarthroplastik) und kniegelenknahen Umstellungsosteotomien (6,1 %). Schlussfolgerung: In absoluten Zahlen besitzen die arthroskopischen Maßnahmen bei unikompartimenteller Gonarthrose einen ungebrochenen Stellenwert vor den endoprothetischen Verfahren. Der Totalendoprothese wird auch bei unkompartimenteller Erkrankung der Vorzug gegeben, wenngleich die Zahl der Schlittenprothesenimplantationen leicht gestiegen ist. Die kniegelenknahen Korrekturosteotomien haben mit Einführung winkelstabiler Osteosyntheseverfahren an Bedeutung gewonnen.

Abstract

Background: Despite good long-term results of primary total knee arthroplasty, it is a commonly accepted aim to stave off joint replacement as long as possible, particularly in younger patients. In this situation the surgeon has to make a careful decision whether an arthroscopic procedure will be promising, a corrective osteotomy may be sensible or a joint replacement due to the patient's age is acceptable. High tibial osteotomy had become increasingly popular by use of the opened wedge technique combined with locking compression plates fixation in the past decades while it has been replaced step by step by total knee arthroplasty. In spite of this fact the German national agency of quality management (BQS) showed that the number of total knee replacements in Germany increased from 90 000 in 2003 to 146 000 in 2008. The share of unicompartmental knee replacements in this period doubled from 5.3 % to almost 10 %. The aim of the present study was to inquire current data regarding particular surgical treatment concepts of unicompartmental knee arthritis in Germany. Material and Methods: In a nationwide anonymous survey in May 2009 220 departments of orthopaedics and 230 departments of trauma surgery were asked about their treatment strategies in unicompartmental knee arthritis in middle-aged patients (30 to 60 years) with unilateral Outerbridge grade III–IV lesions. Overall 46 questions in 6 subject areas (structure of the department, number of treated patients, surgical methods, anaesthesiological procedures, perioperative management, postoperative treatment) were posed. With regard to the item “operative treatment” we asked for the importance of arthroscopic procedures, corrective osteotomies and different procedures of joint replacement. The interpretation was done with invariant data analysis by indication of numerical frequency and percentage distribution of selected options. Results: Questionnaires were returned by 51.1 % of the surveyed departments. This represents a total number of 76,028 procedures in unicompartmental knee arthritis in middle-aged patients. First of all, arthroscopic procedures were applied (50.4 %), followed by knee replacements (43.4 %, of which 87.3 % were total knee replacements, 12.3 % unicompartmental knee replacements and 0.4 % tibial hemiarthroplasties) and corrective osteotomies (6.1 %). In 59.8 % of the 38,376 arthroscopic procedures a microfracturing and in 28.2 % an abrasion arthroplasty was done. Most of the corrective osteotomies were performed at the proximal tibia (90.9 %) using an open wedge technique (73 %) and internal fixation with locking compression plates (72 %). 75.2 % of the responders performed cemented unicompartmental arthroplasties (97.8 %) with an average number of 23.2 per year. 43.4 % believe that bicompartmental arthroplasty in case of additional affection of the femoropatellar joint is an option and 22.6 % believe in the expected advantages of patient-specific unicompartmental implants. Total knee arthroplasties are performed with an average of 197.4 per year, most frequently using the free-hand technique (85.5 %) and medial-parapatellar approach (82 %). Interpositional knee devices were only used in 9.1 % of responding departments with an average number of 6.6 per year. Only procedures with low difficulty level such as arthroscopies were done by residents in a higher number (16.9 %). Procedures with higher difficulty level were mainly done by consultants, senior or chief surgeons. Conclusion: In total, arthroscopic procedures still play an essential role in the treatment of unicompartmental knee arthritis prior to joint replacement. Total knee arthroplasty was preferred even though the number of unicompartmental knee replacements was only slightly increasing. Periarticular corrective osteotomies have gained in importance since the introduction of locking compression plates. Interpositional knee devices play a minor role in the treatment of unilateral knee arthritis in Germany.

Knie - Gonarthrose - chirurgische Behandlung - Fragebogen - Knieendoprothetik

knee - arthritis - surgical treatment - questionnaire - knee replacement

Literatur

• 1 Helminen H J. Sports, loading of cartilage, osteoarthritis and its prevention.  Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2009;  19 143-145
• 2 Harms S, Larson R, Sahmoun A E et al. Obesity increases the likelihood of total joint replacement surgery among younger adults.  Int Orthop. 2007;  31 23-26
• 3 Zeller L, Sukenik S. The association between sports activity and knee osteoarthritis.  Harefuah. 2008;  147 315-319
• 4 Hofmann S, Lobenhoffer P, Staubli A et al. Osteotomien am Kniegelenk bei Monokompartmentarthrose.  Orthopäde. 2009;  38 755-769
• 5 Boy O, Hahn S, Kociemba E. Knie-Totalendoprothesen-Erstimplantation.. Qualität sichtbar machen. BQS-Qualitätsreport 2008.. Düsseldorf: BQS Bundesgeschäftsstelle Qualitätssicherung gGmbH; 2009
• 6 Ärztezeitung.de .Arthrose – ein Gesellschaftsproblem. Im Internet:. http://www.aerztezeitung.de/medizin/krankheiten/skelett_und_weichteilkrankheiten/arthrose/article/513958/arthrose-gesellschaftsproblem.html Stand: 1.10.2008
• 7 Bäthis H, Tingart M, Perlick L et al. Stellenwert von Endoprothetik und Umstellungsosteotomie bei Gonarthrose – Ergebnisse einer Umfrage an Unfallchirurgischen und Orthopädischen Kliniken.  Z Orthop. 2005;  143 19-24
• 8 Outerbridge R E. The etiology of chondromalacia patellae.  J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1961;  43 752-757
• 9 Fuchs S, Jerosch J. Knieendoprothetik – eine Standortbestimmung.  Unfallchirurg. 1996;  99 958-963
• 10 Sendtner E, Boluki D, Grifka J. Aktueller Stand der minimalinvasiven Hüftendoprothetik in Deutschland, neue Implantate und Navigation – Ergebnisse einer bundesweiten Umfrage.  Z Orthop Unfallchir. 2007;  145 297-302
• 11 Moseley J B, O'Malley K, Petersen N J et al. A controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee.  N Engl J Med. 2002;  347 81-88
• 12 Cain E L, Clancy W G. Treatment algorithm for osteochondral injuries of the knee.  Clin Sport Med. 2001;  20 321-342
• 13 Laupattarakasem W, Laopaiboon M, Laupattarakasem P et al. Arthroscopic debridement for knee osteoarthritis.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;  (1) CD005118
• 14 Aaron R K, Skolnick A H, Reinert S E et al. Arthroscopic debridement for osteoarthritis of the knee.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 2006;  88 936-943
• 15 Grifka J, Kalteis T, Plitz W et al. Möglichkeiten der gelenkerhaltenden Gonarthrosetherapie mittels Arthroskopie und ergänzender intraartikulärer Verfahren.  Arthroskopie. 1999;  12 9-16
• 16 Johnson L L. Arthroscopic abrasion arthroplasty historical and pathologic perspective: present status.  Arthroscopy. 1986;  2 54-69
• 17 Steadman J R, Briggs K K, Rodrigo J J et al. Outcomes of microfracture for traumatic chondral defect of the knee: average 11-year follow-up.  Arthroscopy. 2003;  19 477-484
• 18 Coventry M B, Ilstrup D M, Wallrichs S L. Proximal tibial osteotomy. A critical long-term study of eighty-seven cases.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1993;  75 196-201
• 19 Odenbring S, Egund N, Knutson K et al. Revision after osteotomy for gonarthrosis. A 10–19-year follow-up of 314 cases.  Acta Orthop Scand. 1990;  61 128-130
• 20 Fujisawa Y, Masuhara K, Shiomi S. The effect of high tibial osteotomy on osteoarthritis of the knee: an arthroscopic study of 54 knee joints.  Orthop Clin North [Am]. 1979;  10 585-608
• 21 Hernigou P, Medevielle D, Debeyre J et al. Proximal tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis with varus deformity. A ten to thirteen-year follow-up study.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1987;  69 332-354
• 22 Pape D. Präoperative radiologische Planung von kniegelenknahen Tibiaosteotomien.. Kniegelenknahe Osteotomien: Indikation, Planung, Operationstechnik mit Plattenfixateuren.. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2006: 29-37
• 23 Brinkman J-M, Lobenhoffer P, Agneskirchner J D et al. Osteotomies around the knee: Patient selection, stability of fixation and bone healing in high tibial osteotomies.  J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 2008;  90 1548-1557
• 24 Parratte S, Argenson J N, Pearce O et al. Medial unicompartmental knee replacement in the under-50s.  J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 2009;  9 351-356
• 25 Gioe T J, Novak C, Sinner P et al. Knee arthroplasty in the young patient: survival in a community registry.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;  464 83-87
• 26 Boulos K, Jolles-Haeberli B M. Total knee arthroplasty today: what should we tell our patients?.  Rev Med Suisse. 2008;  4 2737-2742
• 27 McKeever D C. Tibial plateau prosthesis.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1960;  18 86-95
• 28 MacIntosh D L. Hemiarthroplasty of the knee using a space occupying prosthesis for painful varus and valgus deformities. In: Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of the Orthopaedic Associations of the English-Speaking World.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1958;  40 1431
• 29 Springer B D, Scott R D, Sah A P et al. McKeever hemiarthroplasty of the knee in patients less than sixty years old.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 2006;  88 366-371
• 30 Sisto D J, Mitchell I L. UniSpacer arthroplasty of the knee.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 2005;  87 1706-1711
• 31 Bailie A G, Lewis P L, Brumby S A et al. The Unispacer knee implant: Early clinical results.  J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 2008;  90 446-450
• 32 Koeck F X, Perlick L, Luring C et al. Leg axis correction with ConforMIS iForma™ (interpositional device) in unicompartmental arthritis of the knee.  Int Orthop. 2009;  33 955-960
• 33 Fitz W. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with use of novel patient-specific resurfacing implants and personalized Jigs.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 2009;  91 69-76
• 34 Rolston L, Bresch J, Engh G et al. Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a bone-sparing, ligament-sparing, and minimally invasive alternative for active patients.  Orthopedics. 2007;  30 (Suppl. 8) 70-73
• 35 Meehan J, Jamali A A, Nguyen H. Prophylactic antibiotics in hip and knee arthroplasty.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 2009;  91 2480-2490
• 36 Saxer F, Dick W. Thromboseprophylaxe in der orthopädischen Chirurgie – vernachlässigte Option mit großem Potenzial.  Z Orthop Unfall. 2010;  148 26-30
• 37 Lüring C, Tingart M, Beckmann J et al. Die operative Ausbildung an deutschen orthopädischen und traumatologischen Kliniken. Im Internet:. http://www.egms.de/en/meetings/dkou2007/07dkou542.shtml Stand: 9.10.2007