Hip Velocity and Arm Coordination in Front Crawl Swimming

Abstract

The hip intracyclic velocity variability and the index of coordination in front crawl swimming were examined in relation to performance level. 22 swimmers were assigned to either an elite or a recreational swimming group and performed 4 swim trials at different paces relative to their individual maximum velocity. A velocity meter system was set to determine intracyclic velocity variability and video analysis allowed the determination of the index of coordination. Mean intracyclic velocity variability was lower in the elite swimmers than the recreational swimmers (14.39±1.97 vs. 17.80±4.23%, p<0.05), and remained stable with swim pace (i. e., the relative velocity) for the elite group, whereas it increased for the recreational group (p<0.05). The elite swimmers were characterized by a lower mean index of coordination than the recreational swimmers (−9.6±7.1 vs. −6.9±5.0%, p<0.05), but it increased with swim velocity in the elite group and showed only a tendency in the recreational group (p=0.07). These findings suggest that low intracyclic velocity variability and its stability over a range of swimming paces, which result from optimized inter-arm coordination, are characteristic of skilled performance. Thus, the examination of intracyclic velocity variability and index of coordination variability with different swim paces could provide new insight into skilled performance in swimming.

Key words

biomechanics - intracyclic velocity variability - motor control - training

References

• 1 Alberty M, Sidney M, Huot-Marchand F, Hespel JM, Pelayo P. Intracyclic velocity variations and arm coordination during exhaustive exercise in front crawl stroke.  Int J Sports Med. 2005;  26 471-475
• 2 Alberty M, Sidney M, Pelayo P, Toussaint HM. Stroking characteristics during time to exhaustion tests.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;  41 637-644
• 3 Alves F, Gomes-Pereira J, Pereira F. Determinants of energy cost of front crawl and backstroke swimming and competitive performance. In: Troup J, Hollander AP, Strasse D, (eds). Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming VII. London: E & FN Spon; 1996: 185-192
• 4 Aujouannet Y, Bonifazi M, Hintzy F, Vuillerme N, Rouard A. Effects of a high-intensity swim test on kinematic parameters in high-level athletes.  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2006;  31 150-158
• 5 Barbosa T, Santos Silva J, Sousa F, Vilas-Boas JP. Comparative study of the response of kinematical variables from the hip and the center of mass in butterfliers. In: Chatard JC, (ed). Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming IX. Saint Etienne: University of Saint Etienne; 2003: 93-98
• 6 Barbosa T, Lima F, Portela A, Novais D, Machado L, Colaço P, Gonçalves P, Fernandes RJ, Keskinen KL, Vilas-Boas JP. BMS 2006 International Symposium: Relationships between energy cost, swimming velocity and fluctuation in competitive swimming strokes.  Rev Port Cien Desp. 2006;  6 192-194
• 7 Barbosa TM, Keskinen KL, Fernandes R, Colaco P, Lima AB, Vilas-Boas JP. Energy cost and intracyclic variation of the velocity of the centre of mass in butterfly stroke.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 2005;  93 519-523
• 8 Chollet D, Pelayo P, Delaplace C, Tourny C, Sidney M. Stroking characteristic variations in the 100-m freestyle for male swimmers of differing skill.  Percept Mot Skills. 1997;  85 167-177
• 9 Chollet D, Chalies S, Chatard JC. A new index of coordination for the crawl: description and usefulness.  Int J Sports Med. 2000;  21 54-59
• 10 Costill DL, Kovaleski J, Porter D, Kirwan J, Fielding R, King D. Energy expenditure during front crawl swimming: predicting success in middle-distance events.  Int J Sports Med. 1985;  6 266-270
• 11 Costill DL, Lee G, d’Acquisto J. Video-Computer assisted analysis of swimming technique.  J Swim Research. 1987;  3 5-9
• 12 Counsilman J. Hand speed and acceleration.  Swim Tech. 1981;  18 22-26
• 13 Craig AB, Skehan PL, Pawelczyk JA, Boomer WL Jr. Velocity, stroke rate, and distance per stroke during elite swimming competition.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1985;  17 625-634
• 14 Figueiredo P, Vilas Boas JP, Maia J, Goncalves P, Fernandes RJ. Does the hip reflect the centre of mass swimming kinematics?.  Int J Sports Med. 2009;  30 779-781
• 15 Fujishima M, Miyashita M. Velocity degradation caused by its fluctuation in swimming and guidelines for improvement of average velocity. In: Keskinen K, Hollander A, (eds). Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming VIII. Jyvaskyla, Finland: University of Jyvaskyla; 1998: 41-45
• 16 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. International Journal of Sports Medicine – Ethical Standards in Sport and Exercise Science Research.  Int J Sports Med. 2009;  30 701-702
• 17 Holmer I. Analysis of acceleration as a measure of swimming proficiency. In: Terauds J, Bedingfield E, (eds). Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming III. Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics Publishers; 1979: 119-125
• 18 Kolmogorov S, Duplischeva O. Active drag, useful mechanical power output and hydrodynamic force coefficient in different swimming strokes at maximal velocity.  J Biomechanics. 1992;  25 311-318
• 19 Kornecki S, Bober T. Extreme velocities of a swimming cycle as a technique criterion. In: Eriksson BO, Furberg B, (eds). Swimming Medicine IV. Baltimore: University Park Press; 1978: 402-407
• 20 Leblanc H, Seifert L, Baudry L, Chollet D. Arm-leg coordination in flat breaststroke: a comparative study between elite and non-elite swimmers.  Int J Sports Med. 2005;  26 787-797
• 21 Leblanc H, Seifert L, Tourny-Chollet C, Chollet D. Intra-cyclic distance per stroke phase, velocity fluctuations and acceleration time ratio of a breaststroker's hip: A comparison between elite and nonelite swimmers at different race paces.  Int J Sports Med. 2007;  28 140-147
• 22 Maglischo CW, Maglischo EW, Santos TR. The relationship between the forward velocity of the center of gravity and the forward velocity of the hip in the four competitive strokes.  J Swim Research. 1987;  3 11-17
• 23 Marinho DA, Barbosa T, Costa MJ, Figueiredo C, Reis VM, Silva AJ, Marques MC. Can 8-weeks of training affect active drag in young swimmers?.  J Sports Sci Med. 2010;  9 71-78
• 24 Miller D. Biomechanics of swimming.  Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1975;  3 219-248
• 25 Nigg B. Selected methodology in biomechanics with respect to swimming. In: Hollander A, Huijing P, de Groot G (eds). Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming. Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics; 1983: 72-80
• 26 Psycharakis SG, Naemi R, Connaboy C, McCabe C, Sanders RH. Three-dimensional analysis of intracycle velocity fluctuations in frontcrawl swimming.  Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2009;  20 128-135
• 27 Psycharakis SG, Sanders RH. Validity of the use of a fixed point for intracycle velocity calculations in swimming.  J Sci Med Sport. 2009;  12 262-265
• 28 Schnitzler C, Ernwein V, Seifert L, Chollet D. Use of the Index of Coordination to assess optimal adaptation: a case study.  Rev Port Cien Desp. 2006;  6 257-259
• 29 Schnitzler C, Seifert L, Ernwein V, Chollet D. Arm coordination adaptations assessment in swimming.  Int J Sports Med. 2008;  29 480-486
• 30 Seifert L, Boulesteix L, Chollet D. Effect of gender on the adaptation of arm coordination in front crawl.  Int J Sports Med. 2004;  25 217-223
• 31 Seifert L, Chollet D, Bardy BG. Effect of swimming velocity on arm coordination in the front crawl: a dynamic analysis.  J Sports Sci. 2004;  22 651-660
• 32 Seifert L, Chollet D, Allard P. Arm coordination symmetry and breathing effect in front crawl.  Hum Mov Sci. 2005;  24 234-256
• 33 Seifert L, Chollet D, Chatard JC. Kinematic changes during a 100-m front crawl: effects of performance level and gender.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;  39 1784-1793
• 34 Seifert L, Chollet D, Rouard A. Swimming constraints and arm coordination.  Hum Mov Sci. 2007;  26 68-86
• 35 Seifert L, Delignieres D, Boulesteix L, Chollet D. Effect of expertise on butterfly stroke coordination.  J Sports Sci. 2007;  25 131-141
• 36 Toussaint HM, Truijens M. Biomechanical aspects of peak performance in human swimming.  Animal Biology. 2005;  55 17-40
• 37 Vennell R, Pease D, Wilson B. Wave drag on human swimmers.  J Biomech. 2006;  39 664-671

Correspondence