Moderne Anforderungen an Wurzelkanalzemente – Eigenschaften – Beurteilungskriterien – zukünftige Trends

Lernziele

Der Leser sollte nach dem Durcharbeiten des Artikels

• die physikalischen, chemischen und biologischen Anforderungen an Wurzelkanalsealer kennen und deren Bedeutung einschätzen können,

• die Kriterien zur Beurteilung der Eigenschaften von Sealern verstehen,

• die von ihm verwendeten Sealer hinsichtlich der klinischen Einsatzmöglichkeit beurteilen können und

• die zukünftigen Tendenzen bei der Neuentwicklung von Sealern reflektiert haben.

Literatur

• 1 Al-Hiyasat AS, Tayyar M, Darmani H. Cytotoxicity evaluation of various resin based root canal sealers.  Int Endod J. 2010;  43 148-153
• 2 Allen RK, Newton CW, Brown Jr. CE. A statistical analysis of surgical and nonsurgical endodontic retreatment cases.  J Endod. 1989;  15 261-266
• 3 Almeida JF et al.. Filling of artificial lateral canals and microleakage and flow of five endodontic sealers.  Int Endod J. 2007;  40 692-699
• 4 Bernardes RA et al.. Evaluation of the flow rate of 3 endodontic sealers: Sealer 26, AH Plus, and MTA Obtura.  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;  109 47-49
• 5 Carvalho-Junior JR et al.. Radiopacity of root filling materials using digital radiography.  Int Endod J. 2007;  40 514-520
• 6 Carvalho-Junior JR et al.. Solubility and dimensional change after setting of root canal sealers: a proposal for smaller dimensions of test samples.  J Endod. 2007;  33 1110-1116
• 7 Carvalho-Junior JR et al.. Evaluation of solubility, disintegration, and dimensional alterations of a glass ionomer root canal sealer.  Braz Dent J. 2003;  14 114-118
• 8 Chang MC et al.. Comparative cytotoxicity of five root canal sealers on cultured human periodontal ligament fibroblasts.  Int Endod J. 2010;  43 251-257
• 9 Erdemir A, Adanir N, Belli S. In vitro evaluation of the dissolving effect of solvents on root canal sealers.  J Oral Sci. 2003;  45 123-126
• 10 Fisher MA, Berzins DW, Bahcall JK. An in vitro comparison of bond strength of various obturation materials to root canal dentin using a push-out test design.  J Endod. 2007;  33 856-858
• 11 Fonzar F et al.. The prognosis of root canal therapy: a 10-year retrospective cohort study on 411 patients with 1175 endodontically treated teeth.  Eur J Oral Implantol. 2009;  2 201-208
• 12 Garrido AD et al.. Laboratory evaluation of the physicochemical properties of a new root canal sealer based on Copaifera multijuga oil-resin.  Int Endod J. 2010;  43 283-291
• 13 Huang FM et al.. Cytotoxicity of resin-, zinc oxide-eugenol-, and calcium hydroxide-based root canal sealers on human periodontal ligament cells and permanent V79 cells.  Int Endod J. 2002;  35 153-158
• 14 Jainaen A, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Push-out bond strengths of the dentine-sealer interface with and without a main cone.  Int Endod J. 2007;  40 882-890
• 15 Lee KW et al.. Adhesion of endodontic sealers to dentin and gutta-percha.  J Endod. 2002;  28 684-688
• 16 Miyagak DC et al.. In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of endodontic sealers.  Braz Oral Res. 2006;  20 303-306
• 17 Orstavik D. Materials used for root canal obturation: technical, biological and clinical testing.  Endodontic Topics. 2005;  12 25-38
• 18 Orstavik D, Nordahl I, Tibballs JE. Dimensional change following setting of root canal sealer materials.  Dent Mater. 2001;  17 512-519
• 19 Pitt TR Ford et al.. Qualitiy Guideline of the European Society of Endodontology.  J Endod. 2006;  15 387-401
• 20 Queiroz AM et al.. Antibacterial activity of root canal filling materials for primary teeth: zinc oxide and eugenol cement, Calen paste thickened with zinc oxide, Sealapex and EndoREZ.  Braz Dent J. 2009;  20 290-296
• 21 Resende LM et al.. A comparative study of physicochemical properties of AH Plus, Epiphany, and Epiphany SE root canal sealers.  Int Endod J. 2009;  42 785-793
• 22 Schäfer E. Wurzelkanalfüllmaterialien. Schweiz.  Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2000;  110 849-861
• 23 Schäfer E, Zandbiglari T. Solubility of root-canal sealers in water and artificial saliva.  Int Endod J. 2003;  36 660-669
• 24 Siqueira Jr. JF et al.. Antimicrobial activity and flow rate of newer and established root canal sealers.  J Endod. 2000;  26 274-277
• 25 Sly MM et al.. Push-out bond strength of a new endodontic obturation system (Resilon/Epiphany).  J Endod. 2007;  33 160-162
• 26 Souza SF et al.. Polymerization stress, flow and dentine bond strength of two resin-based root canal sealers.  Int Endod J. 2009;  42 867-873
• 27 Tanomaru-Filho M et al.. Radiopacity evaluation of new root canal filling materials by digitalization of images.  J Endod. 2007;  33 249-251
• 28 Tay FR, Pashley DH. Monoblocks in root canals: a hypothetical or a tangible goal.  J Endod. 2007;  33 391-398
• 29 Thiele L, Hickel R, Folwaczny M. Der endodontische Misserfolg – von der Definition zur Strategie.  Dtsch Zahnärztl Zeitschrift. 2003;  58 144-150
• 30 Wennberg A, Orstavik D. Adhesion of root canal sealers to bovine dentine and gutta-percha.  Int Endod J. 1990;  23 13-19

Korrespondenzadresse