Magnitude of Cement-Device Interfacial Stresses with and without Tibial Stemming: Impact of BMI

ABSTRACT

Patients expect their total knee arthroplasty to relieve pain and to be long lasting. With patients becoming more active, weighing more, and living longer, this expectation becomes increasingly more difficult to fulfill. Patients who are obese and active put greater loads on their implants and may have a greater risk of failure. Although much attention has been paid to decreasing polyethylene wear, a major cause of implant failure, very little research focus has been directed to elucidate other measures to reduce failure, such as the efficacy of prophylactic stemming of the tibial tray. This study explored whether additional mechanical support for tibial base plates would help reduce bone cement stresses in heavy patients, who, like patients with a high activity level, put added stress on their implants. A tibial base plate with a 12-mm-diameter × 50-mm-long stem was compared with the same tibial base plate with a 15-mm-diameter × 20-mm-long end cap using finite element analysis. The results indicate that the tibial base plate with a prophylactic stem significantly reduced compressive and shear stresses on the cement-device interface and therefore may help to reduce the possibility of tibial loosening in these at-risk patients. Further, such studies will aid the surgeon in educating patients and in selecting the appropriate implant strategy.

Total knee arthroplasty - tibial loosening - prophylactic stemming - finite element analysis - bone cement stresses

REFERENCES

• 1 Crowninshield R D, Rosenberg A G, Sporer S M. Changing demographics of patients with total joint replacement.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;  443 266-272
• 2 Kurtz S M, Lau E, Ong K, Zhao K, Kelly M, Bozic K J. Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: National projections from 2010 to 2030.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;  467 2606-2612
• 3 Dowsey M M, Liew D, Stoney J D, Choong P F. The impact of pre-operative obesity on weight change and outcome in total knee replacement: A prospective study of 529 consecutive patients.  J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;  92 513-520
• 4 Berend M E, Ritter M A, Hyldahl H C, Meding J B, Redelman R. Implant migration and failure in total knee arthroplasty is related to body mass index and tibial component size.  J Arthroplasty. 2008;  23 (6, Suppl 1) 104-109
• 5 Gillespie G N, Porteous A J. Obesity and knee arthroplasty.  Knee. 2007;  14 81-86
• 6 Bourne R B, Finlay J B. The influence of tibial component intramedullary stems and implant-cortex contact on the strain distribution of the proximal tibia following total knee arthroplasty. An in vitro study.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;  (208) 95-99
• 7 Wuestemann T, Bastian A, Schmidt W, Cedermark C, Parvizi J, Rothman R. A novel technique for studying proximal femoral bone morphology for hip implant design.  Poster presented at: 56th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society; March 6–9, 2010; New Orleans, LA
• 8 Stryker Orthopaedics. Triathlon Knee System Universal Baseplate Surgical Protocol. LSPK44 rev 1 Mahwah, NJ: Stryker Orthopaedics; 2009
• 9 Rho J Y, Hobatho M C, Ashman R B. Relations of mechanical properties to density and CT numbers in human bone.  Med Eng Phys. 1995;  17 347-355
• 10 Klever F J, Klumpert R, Horenberg J, Grootenboer H J, Van Campen D H, Pauly T. Global mechanical properties of trabecular bone: Experimental determination and prediction from structural model. Biomechanics: Current Interdisciplinary Research. The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff; 1985: 167-172
• 11 Carter D R, Hayes W C. The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977;  59 954-962
• 12 Heinlein B, Kutzner I, Graichen F et al.. ESB Clinical Biomechanics Award 2008: Complete data of total knee replacement loading for level walking and stair climbing measured in vivo with a follow-up of 6-10 months.  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2009;  24 315-326
• 13 Ramaniraka N A, Rakotomanana L R, Leyvraz P F. The fixation of the cemented femoral component. Effects of stem stiffness, cement thickness and roughness of the cement-bone surface.  J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;  82 297-303
• 14 Hansen D, Steen Jensen J. Additional mechanical tests of bone cements.  Acta Orthop Belg. 1992;  58 268-271
• 15 Mann K A, Bartel D L, Wright T M. The effect of using a plasma-sprayed stem-cement interface on stresses in a cemented femoral hip component. Poster presented at: 38th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society; February 17–20, 1992; Washington, DC
• 16 Foran J R, Mont M A, Etienne G, Jones L C, Hungerford D S. The outcome of total knee arthroplasty in obese patients.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;  86 1609-1615
• 17 Vazquez-Vela Johnson G, Worland R L, Keenan J, Norambuena N. Patient demographics as a predictor of the ten-year survival rate in primary total knee replacement.  J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;  85 52-56
• 18 Rajgopal V, Bourne R B, Chesworth B M, MacDonald S J, McCalden R W, Rorabeck C H. The impact of morbid obesity on patient outcomes after total knee arthroplasty.  J Arthroplasty. 2008;  23 795-800
• 19 Kuster M S. Exercise recommendations after total joint replacement: A review of the current literature and proposal of scientifically based guidelines.  Sports Med. 2002;  32 433-445