J Knee Surg 2011; 24(1): 055-060
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1275400
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

© Thieme Medical Publishers

Water-Tight Knee Arthrotomy Closure: Comparison of a Novel Single Bidirectional Barbed Self-Retaining Running Suture Versus Conventional Interrupted Sutures

Michael Nett1 , Rui Avelar2 , Michael Sheehan3 , Fred Cushner1
  • 1Department of Orthopaedics, Insall Scott Kelly Institute for Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, New York, New York
  • 2Angiotech Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • 3North Shore-LIJ Bioskills Education Center, Lake Success, New York
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
21 March 2011 (online)

ABSTRACT

Standard medial parapatellar arthrotomies of 10 cadaveric knees were closed with either conventional interrupted absorbable sutures (control group, mean of 19.4 sutures) or a single running knotless bidirectional barbed absorbable suture (experimental group). Water-tightness of the arthrotomy closure was compared by simulating a tense hemarthrosis and measuring arthrotomy leakage over 3 minutes. Mean total leakage was 356 mL and 89 mL in the control and experimental groups, respectively (p = 0.027). Using 8 of the 10 knees (4 closed with control sutures, 4 closed with an experimental suture), a tense hemarthrosis was again created, and iatrogenic suture rupture was performed: a proximal suture was cut at 1 minute; a distal suture was cut at 2 minutes. The impact of suture rupture was compared by measuring total arthrotomy leakage over 3 minutes. Mean total leakage was 601 mL and 174 mL in the control and experimental groups, respectively (p = 0.3). In summary, using a cadaveric model, arthrotomies closed with a single bidirectional barbed running suture were statistically significantly more water-tight than those closed using a standard interrupted technique. The sample size was insufficient to determine whether the two closure techniques differed in leakage volume after suture rupture.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Jaberi F M, Parvizi J, Haytmanek C T, Joshi A, Purtill J. Procrastination of wound drainage and malnutrition affect the outcome of joint arthroplasty.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;  466 1368-1371
  • 2 Saleh K, Olson M, Resig S et al.. Predictors of wound infection in hip and knee joint replacement: Results from a 20 year surveillance program.  J Orthop Res. 2002;  20 506-515
  • 3 Murtha A P, Kaplan A L, Paglia M J, Mills B B, Feldstein M L, Ruff G L. Evaluation of a novel technique for wound closure using a barbed suture.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;  117 1769-1780
  • 4 Angiotech. Quill™ Self-Retaining System (SRS) Comprised of Dyed PDO (Polydioxanone) Synthetic Absorbable Surgical Suture Material. Instructions for Use. Reading, PA: Angiotech; 2007–2009
  • 5 Lehman E. Nonparametrics: Statistical Methods Based on Ranks. San Francisco, CA: Holden-Day Inc.; 1975
  • 6 Burr I. Applied Statistical Methods. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1974
  • 7 Moran M E, Marsh C, Perrotti M. Bidirectional-barbed sutured knotless running anastomosis v classic Van Velthoven suturing in a model system.  J Endourol. 2007;  21 (10) 1175-1178

Fred CushnerM.D. 

Department of Orthopaedics, Insall Scott Kelly Institute for Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine

210 East 64th Street, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10065

Email: fcush@att.net