Ultraschall Med 2011; 32(5): 440-459
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1281762
Fort- und Weiterbildung/Continuing Medical Education

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Ultraschallgezielte Interventionen an peripheren Nerven: diagnostische und therapeutische Indikationen

Ultrasound-Guided Interventions at Peripheral Nerves: Diagnostic and Therapeutic IndicationsH. Kopf1 , G. H. Mostbeck1 , 2 , A. Loizides3 , H. Gruber3
  • 1Institut für diagnostische und interventionelle Radiologie, Wilhelminenspital der Stadt Wien
  • 2Institut für Röntgendiagnostik, Sozialmedizinisches Zentrum Baumgartner Höhe Otto
  • 3Univ.-Klinik f. Radiologie, Med. Univ. Innsbruck
Further Information

Publication History

eingereicht: 5.9.2011

angenommen: 5.9.2011

Publication Date:
10 October 2011 (online)

Kernaussagen

  • US-geleitete Interventionen an peripheren Nerven erfolgen unter Verwendung einer externen Führung oder in „Freihandtechnik” unter Verwendung optimierter US-Technik zur Darstellung der Nadel („In-Plane-Technik”) und der Zielstruktur bzw. -pathologie.

  • Die Gewebediagnostik suspekter peripherer Nerventumoren erfolgt unter Verwendung der Schneidbiopsie mit mindestens 3 Gewebeproben. Empfohlen wird die Verwendung einer Koaxialtechnik. US-Kontrastmittel können helfen, vitales, vaskularisiertes Gewebe von Nekrose zu differenzieren und erhöhen die Zahl diagnostisch verwertbarer Biopsien.

  • Die ultraschallgeleitete Regionalanästhesie an der oberen und unteren Extremität hat im Vergleich zur „blinden” Vorgehen den Vorteil einer höheren Effektivität bei geringerer Komplikationsrate.

  • Die US-geleitete Schmerztherapie an peripheren Nerven und Neuromen optimiert die Applikation von Medikamenten zur temporären und permanenten Schmerzausschaltung ohne Verwendung von Röntgenstrahlen. Am Achsenskelett helfen anatomisch-sonografische Leitstrukturen und ein standardisiertes Vorgehen, die Medikamente direkt an die Wurzel bzw. in das schmerzende Gelenk zu applizieren.

  • Die Therapie symptomatischer Neurome mit Radiofrequenzablation zeigt erste, vielversprechende Ergebnisse, Langzeitbeobachtungen und größere Untersuchungsserien stehen hier aber noch aus.

Main statements

  • US-guided interventions in peripheral nerves are performed using external guidance or the ”freehand technique” with an optimized US method for visualizing the needle (”in-plane technique”) and the target structure or pathology.

  • Tissue diagnostics of suspicious peripheral nerve tumors is performed using incisional biopsy with at least 3 tissue samples. A coaxial technique is recommended.

  • US contrast agents can help to differentiate vital vascularized tissue from necrosis and increase the number of diagnostically viable biopsies. Compared to the ”blind” approach, ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia in the upper and lower extremities has the advantage of higher effectiveness with a lower complication rate.

  • US-guided pain therapy in peripheral nerves and neuromas optimizes the application of medications for temporary or permanent pain relief without the use of X-rays. Anatomical guide structures on the axial skeleton and a standardized approach make it possible to administer medications directly at the root or into the painful joint.

  • The treatment of symptomatic neuromas with radiofrequency ablation has yielded promising first results. However, long-term observations and larger study series are not yet available.

Literatur/References

  • 1 Kransdorf M J. Benign soft-tissue tumors in a large referral population: distribution of specific diagnoses by age, sex, and location.  Am J Roentgenol. 1995;  164 395-402
  • 2 Kransdorf M J. Malignant soft-tissue tumors in a large referral population: distribution of diagnoses by age, sex, and location.  Am J Roentgenol. 1995;  164 129-134
  • 3 Moore D. Regional Block. Springfield, IL: Thomas; 1954
  • 4 Graf B M, Martin E. Peripheral nerve block. An overview of new developments in an old technique.  Anaesthesist. 2001;  50 312-322
  • 5 Kovacs P, Gruber H, Piegger J et al. New, simple, ultrasound-guided infiltration of the pudendal nerve: ultrasonographic technique.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 1381-1385
  • 6 Kopf H, Loizides A, Mostbeck G H et al. Diagnostic Sonography of Peripheral Nerves: Indications, Examination Techniques and Pathological Findings (Diagnostische Sonografie peripherer Nerven: Indikationen, Techniken und Pathologien).  Ultraschall in Med. 2011;  32 242-266
  • 7 Phal P M, Brooks D M, Wolfe R. Sonographically guided biopsy of focal lesions: a comparison of freehand and probe-guided techniques using a phantom.  Am J Roentgenol. 2005;  184 1652-1656
  • 8 Singh H K, Kilpatrick S E, Silverman J F. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of soft tissue sarcomas: utility and diagnostic challenges.  Adv Anat Pathol. 2004;  11 24-37
  • 9 Dupuy D E, Rosenberg A E, Punyaratabandhu T et al. Accuracy of CT-guided needle biopsy of musculoskeletal neoplasms.  Am J Roentgenol. 1998;  171 759-762
  • 10 Torriani M, Etchebehere M, Amstalden E. Sonographically guided core needle biopsy of bone and soft tissue tumors.  J Ultrasound Med. 2002;  21 275-281
  • 11 Ogilvie C M, Torbert J T, Finstein J L et al. Clinical utility of percutaneous biopsies of musculoskeletal tumors.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;  450 95-100
  • 12 Hansen E, Wolff N, Knuechel R et al. Tumor cells in blood shed from the surgical field.  Arch Surg. 1995;  130 387-393
  • 13 Ogilvie C M, Torbert J T, Finstein J L et al. Clinical Utility of Percutaneous Biopsies of Musculoskeletal Tumors.  Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2006;  450 95-100
  • 14 Mitsuyoshi G, Naito N, Kawai A et al. Accurate diagnosis of musculoskeletal lesions by core needle biopsy.  J Surg Oncol. 2006;  94 21-27
  • 15 Loizides A, Widmann G, Freuis T et al. Optimizing Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy of Musculoskeletal Masses by Application of an Ultrasound Contrast Agent.  Ultraschall in Med. 2010;  32(3) 307-310
  • 16 Kovacs P, Gruber H, Piegger J et al. New, simple, ultrasound-guided infiltration of the pudendal nerve: ultrasonographic technique.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 1381-1385
  • 17 Schwemmer U, Markus C K, Brederlau J et al. Einsatz von Ultraschall zur Durchführung peripherer Nervenblockaden.  Ultraschall in Med. 2009;  30 6-24
  • 18 Bridenbaugh L. The upper extremity: somatic blockade. In: Cousins M, Bridenbaugh P O, editor Neural blockade in clinical anesthesia and management of pain.. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1988: 387-416
  • 19 Goldberg M E, Gregg C, Larijani G E et al. A comparison of three methods of axillary approach to brachial plexus blockade for upper extremity surgery.  Anesthesiology. 1987;  66 814-816
  • 20 Winnie A P, Ramamurthy S, Durrani Z. The inguinal paravascular technic of lumbar plexus anesthesia: the ”3-in-1 block”.  Anesth Analg. 1973;  52 989-996
  • 21 Ootaki C, Hayashi H, Amano M. Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block: an alternative technique to anatomical landmark-guided approaches.  Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2000;  25 600-604
  • 22 Kirchmair L, Entner T, Kapral S et al. Ultrasound guidance for the psoas compartment block: an imaging study.  Anesth Analg. 2002;  94 706-710 ; table of contents
  • 23 Marhofer P, Nasel C, Sitzwohl C et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the distribution of local anesthetic during the three-in-one block.  Anesth Analg. 2000;  90 119-124
  • 24 Gruber H, Kovacs P, Piegger J et al. New, simple, ultrasound-guided infiltration of the pudendal nerve: topographic basics.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 1376-1380
  • 25 Rasmussen M R, Kitaoka H B, Patzer G L. Nonoperative treatment of plantar interdigital neuroma with a single corticosteroid injection.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;  326 188-193
  • 26 Al-Nasser B. Intraneural injection of local anesthetics during ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block may lead to nerve injury.  Anesthesiology. 2007;  106 1245-1246 ; author reply 7
  • 27 Fredberg U. Local corticosteroid injection in sport: review of literature and guidelines for treatment.  Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1997;  7 131-139
  • 28 Westerlund T, Vuorinen V, Roytta M. Same axonal regeneration rate after different endoneurial response to intraneural glycerol and phenol injection.  Acta Neuropathol. 2001;  102 41-54
  • 29 Gruber H, Kovacs P, Peer S et al. Sonographically guided phenol injection in painful stump neuroma.  Am J Roentgenol. 2004;  182 952-954
  • 30 Gruber H, Glodny B, Kopf H et al. Practical experience with sonographically guided phenol instillation of stump neuroma: predictors of effects, success, and outcome.  Am J Roentgenol. 2008;  190 1263-1269
  • 31 Verdugo R J, Salinas R A, Castillo J L et al. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;  4 CD001552
  • 32 Spinner R J. Outcomes for peripheral nerve entrapment syndromes.  Clin Neurosurg. 2006;  53 285-294
  • 33 Tennent T D, Goddard N J. Carpal tunnel decompression: open vs endoscopic.  Br J Hosp Med. 1997;  58 551-554
  • 34 Riew K D, Yin Y, Gilula L et al. The effect of nerve-root injections on the need for operative treatment of lumbar radicular pain. A prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind study.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;  82-A 1589-1593
  • 35 Manchikanti L, Damron K, Cash K et al. Therapeutic cervical medial branch blocks in managing chronic neck pain: a preliminary report of a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial: clinical trial NCT0033272.  Pain Physician. 2006;  9 333-346
  • 36 Galiano K, Obwegeser A A, Bodner G et al. Ultrasound guidance for facet joint injections in the lumbar spine: a computed tomography-controlled feasibility study.  Anesth Analg. 2005;  101 579-583 , table of contents
  • 37 Galiano K, Obwegeser A A, Bale R et al. Ultrasound-guided and CT-navigation-assisted periradicular and facet joint injections in the lumbar and cervical spine: a new teaching tool to recognize the sonoanatomic pattern.  Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007;  32 254-257
  • 38 Loizides A, Gruber H, Peer S et al. A new simplified sonographic approach for pararadicular injections in the lumbar spine: a CT-controlled cadaver study.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;  32 828-831
  • 39 Ewertsen C, Henriksen B M, Torp-Pedersen S et al. Characterization by Biopsy or CEUS of Liver Lesions Guided by Image Fusion between Ultrasonography and CT, PET/CT or MRI (Charakterisierung von Leberläsionen mittels Biopsie oder CEUS anhand von Bildfusion zwischen Ultraschall und CT, PET/CT oder MRT).  Ultraschall in Med. 2011;  32 191-197

Helmut Kopf

Institut für diagnostische und interventionelle Radiologie, Wilhelminenspital der Stadt Wien

Montleartstrasse 37

1160 Wien

Österreich

Phone: ++ 43/1/49 15 03 10 8

Fax: ++ 43/1/49 15 03 10 9

Email: helmut.kopf@wienkav.at

    >