Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg 2011; 27(5): 397-412
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1288923
© Thieme Medical Publishers

The Effect of Facial Asymmetry on Nasal Deviation

Richard W. Westreich1 , David Burstein2 , Marika Fraser2
  • 1Department of Otolaryngology, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
  • 2Department of Otolaryngology, SUNY Downstate, Brooklyn, New York, New York
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
25 October 2011 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

The impact of facial asymmetry on nasal deviation is an accepted but poorly understood part of plastic surgery and rhinology training. Recently, an increased understanding of the specific structural issues underlying this deformity has led to improved surgical techniques and patient outcomes.

KEYWORDS

Rhinoplasty - septoplasty - nasal deviation - facial asymmetry - surgical technique

REFERENCES

  • 1 Yao F, Lawson W, Westreich R W. Effect of midfacial asymmetry on nasal axis deviation: indications for use of the subalar graft.  Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2009;  11 157-164
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Hafezi F, Naghibzadeh B, Nouhi A, Yavari P. Asymmetric facial growth and deviated nose: a new concept.  Ann Plast Surg. 2010;  64 47-51
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Chatrath P, De Cordova J, Nouraei S A, Ahmed J, Saleh H A. Objective assessment of facial asymmetry in rhinoplasty patients.  Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007;  9 184-187
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Nouraei S A, Pulido M A, Saleh H A. Impact of rhinoplasty on objective measurement and psychophysical appreciation of facial symmetry.  Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2009;  11 198-202
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Hwang H S, Min Y S, Lee S C, Sun M K, Lim H S. Change of lip-line cant after 1-jaw orthognathic surgery in patients with mandibular asymmetry.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;  136 564-569
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Lee M S, Chung D H, Lee J W, Cha K S. Assessing soft-tissue characteristics of facial asymmetry with photographs.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;  138 23-31
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Binder W J, Azizzadeh B. Malar and submalar augmentation.  Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2008;  16 11-32 v
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Losee J E, Kirschner R E, Whitaker L A, Bartlett S P. Congenital nasal anomalies: a classification scheme.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;  113 676-689
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Lanza D C, Kennedy D W, Koltai P J. Applied nasal anatomy & embryology.  Ear Nose Throat J. 1991;  70 416-422
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Szeremeta W, Parikh T D, Widelitz J S. Congenital nasal malformations.  Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2007;  40 97-112 vi-vii
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Li A Q, Sun Y G, Wang G H, Zhong Z K, Cutting C. Anatomy of the nasal cartilages of the unilateral complete cleft lip nose.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;  109 1835-1838
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Markus A F, Delaire J, Smith W P. Facial balance in cleft lip and palate. II. Cleft lip and palate and secondary deformities.  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992;  30 296-304
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Coleman J R, Sykes J M. Cleft lip rhinoplasty. In: Papel I D, ed. Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2nd ed. New York: Thieme; 2002: 813-829
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Westreich R W, Lawson W. The tripod theory of nasal tip support revisited: the cantilevered spring model.  Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2008;  10 170-179
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Gougoutas A J, Singh D J, Low D W, Bartlett S P. Hemifacial microsomia: clinical features and pictographic representations of the OMENS classification system.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;  120 112e-120e
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Pastorek N J, Becker D G. Treating the caudal septal deflection.  Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2000;  2 217-220
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Zucker A, Wiegand D. Freud, Fliess, and the nasogenital reflex: did a look into the nose let us see the mind?.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1988;  98 319-322
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Bhattacharyya N. Clinical outcomes after revision endoscopic sinus surgery.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;  130 975-978
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Komori M, Kawamura S, Ishihara S. Averageness or symmetry: which is more important for facial attractiveness?.  Acta Psychol (Amst). 2009;  131 136-142
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Ishii L, Carey J, Byrne P, Zee D S, Ishii M. Measuring attentional bias to peripheral facial deformities.  Laryngoscope. 2009;  119 459-465
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Westreich R W, Lawson W. Perforating double lateral osteotomy.  Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2005;  7 257-260
    Google Scholar

Richard W WestreichM.D. F.A.C.S. 

Department of Otolaryngology, Lenox Hill Hospital

45 West 67th Street, New York, NY 10023

Email: doctor@newyorknose.com

      >