Pneumologie 2012; 66(02): 89-95
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1291617
Originalarbeit
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Prognoserelevanz von Body-Mass-Index und Rash für Patienten mit metastasiertem nichtkleinzelligem Lungenkarzinom unter Therapie mit Erlotinib

Eine retrospektive-geschlechtsspezifische AnalysePrognostic Relevance of Body Mass Index and Rash for Patients with Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer under Therapy with ErlotinibA Retrospective, Gender-Specific Analysis
B. Böker
Klinik für Pneumologie, Evangelische Lungenklinik Berlin-Buch
,
H. Lüders
Klinik für Pneumologie, Evangelische Lungenklinik Berlin-Buch
,
C. Grohé
Klinik für Pneumologie, Evangelische Lungenklinik Berlin-Buch
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

eingereicht 20 July 2011

akzeptiert nach Revision 05 December 2011

Publication Date:
15 February 2012 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Die Therapie mit Tyrosinkinasehemmern der EGFR Signalkaskade, wie z. B. Erlotinib bei Patienten mit nichtkleinzelligen Lungenkarzinomen im Stadium IV, gewinnt zunehmend an Bedeutung. Die Histologie ist ein bekannter Prognosefaktor für das Ansprechen auf diese Therapie, ebenso der EGF-Rezeptor-Mutationsstatus. Weitere Indikatoren, die mit der Prognose assoziiert sind, sind ungenügend definiert, insbesondere fehlen Angaben zur Rolle des Ernährungszustands des Patienten bei einer standardisierten Chemotherapiedosierung der Substanzgruppe. In der vorliegenden retrospektiven Analyse von 275 Patienten, die mit Erlotinib behandelt wurden, wurden weitere klinisch-prognostische Faktoren definiert. Eine stark ausgeprägte Hautreaktion (Rash) war insbesondere bei männlichen Patienten mit einer schlechten Prognose bezüglich des Gesamtüberlebens verbunden. Aktive Raucher entwickeln ebenfalls häufiger intensiven Rash als Nichtraucher und haben auch eine schlechtere Prognose. Patienten mit Untergewicht (BMI < 18) oder starkem Übergewicht (BMI > 30) entwickeln nicht häufiger starken Rash als normalgewichtige Patienten, haben unter Erlotinib jedoch auch ein schlechtes Gesamtüberleben. Klinisch relevante Prognosefaktoren wie z. B. der Ernährungszustand sollen in der Zukunft eine größere Rolle in der palliativen Therapie von Patienten mit NSCLC spielen.

Abstract

Tyrosine kinase inhibition (TKI) such as erlotinib is a well established treatment option in the palliative care of patients with non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Histology and sex have been associated with different prognostic outcome measures in patients treated with erlotinib. Furthermore, the degree of rash, developed during treatment might be a relevant marker in respect to tumor response. To dissect these clinical relevant features we analysed a cohort of 275 patients treated with erlotinib in different lines of chemotherapy in our hospital. Nutrition status plays an important role in the prognosis of patients in a palliative chemotherapeutic setting, we therefore included body mass index measurements (BMI) in our analysis. We found that BMI and smoking status influence different survival patterns. Male patients have a poorer survival based on low BMI, rash development and smoking status. We therefore conclude that both nutritional and smoking status should be taken into account in the surveillance of patients with NSCLC in a palliative therapeutic setting under TKI treatment.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Goeckenjan G, Sitter H, Thomas M et al. Prävention, Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge des Lungenkarzinoms, Interdisziplinäre S3-Leitlinie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pneumologie und Beatmungsmedizin und der Deutschen Krebsgesellschaft. Pneumologie 2010; 64 (Supplement 2): S23-S155
  • 2 Jackman DM, Johnson BE. Small-cell lung cancer. Lancet 2005; 366: 1385-1396
  • 3 Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP et al. Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 92-98
  • 4 Pirker J, Pereira JR, Szczesna A et al. Cetuximab plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced non small-cell lung cancer (FLEX); an open label randomised phase III trial. Lancet 2009; 373: 1525-1531
  • 5 Scagliotti GV, Parikh P, von Pawel J et al. Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 3543-3551
  • 6 Shepherd FA, Rodrigues Pereira J, Ciuleanu T et al. Erlotinib in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 123-132
  • 7 Bezjak A, Tu D, Seymour L et al. Symptom improvement in lung cancer patients treated with erlotinib: quality of life analysis of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study BR. 21. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 3831-3837
  • 8 Mok TS, Wu Y, Thongprasert S et al. Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 947-957
  • 9 Kobayashi K, Inoue A, Maemondo M et al. First-line gefitinib versus first-line chemotherapy by carboplatin (CBDCA) plus paclitaxel (TXL) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutations: A phase III study (002) by North East Japan Gefitinib Study Group. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2009; 27: abstr 8016
  • 10 Tsurutani J, Mitsudomi T, Mori S et al. A phase III, first-line trial of gefitinib versus cisplatin plus docetaxel for patients with advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbouring activating mutation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene. ECCO/ESMO 2009; 7: abstr 505
  • 11 Maeda R, Yoshida J, Ishii G et al. Long-term survival and risk factors for recurrence in stage I non-small cell lung cancer patients with tumors up to 3 cm in maximum dimension. Chest 2010; Online Publikation DOI: 10.1378/chest.09 – 3046.
  • 12 Brueckl WM, Schoeberl A, Wirtz RM et al. Increased vascular-endothelial growth factor (VEGF) tumor expression and response to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor erlotinib in NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol 2008; 3: 314-316
  • 13 Gamou S, Hunts J, Harigai H et al. Molecular evidence for the lack of epidermal growth factor receptor gene expression in small cell lung carcinoma cells. Cancer Res 1987; 47: 2668-2673
  • 14 Shigematsu H, Lin L, Takahashi T et al. Clinical and biological features associated with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations in lung cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005; 97: 339-346
  • 15 Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R et al. Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 2129-2139
  • 16 Paez JG, Janne PA, Lee JC et al. EGFR mutations in lung cancer. Correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science 2004; 304: 1497-1500
  • 17 Kosaka T, Yatabe Y, Endoh H et al. Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene in lung cancer: biological and clinical implications. Cancer Res 2004; 64: 8919-8923
  • 18 Marchetti A, Martella C, Felicioni L et al. EGFR mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer: analysis of a large series of cases and development of a rapid and sensitive method for diagnostic screening with potential implications on pharmacologic treatment. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 857-865
  • 19 Mitsudomi T, Kosaka T, Endoh H. Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene predict prolonged survival after gefitinib treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer with postoperative recurrence. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 2513-2520
  • 20 Tomida S, Koshikawa K, Yatabe Y et al. Gene-expression-based, individualized outcome prediction for surgically treated lung cancer patients. Oncogene 2004; 23: 5360-5370
  • 21 Gazdar AF. Activating and resistance mutations of EGFR in non-small cell lung cancer: role in clinical response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Oncogene 2009; 28 (Suppl 1): S24-S31
  • 22 Jackman DM, Miller VA, Cioffredi LA et al. Impact of epidermal growth factor receptor and KRAS mutations on clinical outcomes in previously untreated non-small cell lung cancer patients: results of an online tumor registry of clinical trials. Clin Cancer Res 2009; 15: 5267-5273
  • 23 Vamvakas L et al. Pemetrexed compared with erlotinib in pretreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Results of a randomized phase III Hellenic Oncology Research group trial. JCO 2010; 28: 7 Abstract 7519
  • 24 Wacker B et al. Correlation between development of rash and efficacy in patients treated with the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib in two large phase III studies. Clin Cancer Res 2007; 13: 3913-3921
  • 25 Norman K et al. Cutoff percentiles of bioelectrical phase angle predict functionality, quality of life and mortality in patients with cancer. Am J Clin Nutr 2010; 92: 612-619
  • 26 Tsao AS et al. Smoking affects treatment outcome in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer. Cancer 2006; 106: 2428-2436
  • 27 Clark GM et al. Clinical benefit of erlotinib in male smokers with squamous-cell NSCLC; ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings Part I. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24 (Suppl 7166): 18
  • 28 Hamilton M, Wolf JL, Rusk J et al. Effects of Smoking on the Pharmakokinetics of Erlotinib. Clin Cancer Res 2006; 12: 2166-2171
  • 29 Renouf DJ, Tang PA, Chen EX et al. An analysis of the effect of smoking status on Study of erlotinib in advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28 (Suppl): 4056
  • 30 Mazzoni F, Rotella V et al. From clinical trials to clinical practice: predictors of response to erlotinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients pretreated with chemotherapy. Tumori 2011; 97: 160-165
  • 31 Pirlich M, Schütz T, Norman K et al. The German Hospital Malnutrition Study. Clin Nutr 2006; 25: 563-572
  • 32 Adler G, Seufferlein T, Bischoff SC et al. S3-Leitlinie “Exokrines Pankreaskarzinom“. Z Gastroenterol 2007; 45: 487-523