Int J Sports Med 2012; 33(05): 376-380
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1299702
Training & Testing
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Effect of Different Pushing Speeds on Bench Press

J. Padulo
1   Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Rome, Italy
,
P. Mignogna
2   Health Sciences, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
,
S. Mignardi
1   Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Rome, Italy
,
F. Tonni
1   Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Rome, Italy
,
S. D’Ottavio
1   Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Rome, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History



accepted after revision 25 November 2011

Publication Date:
08 February 2012 (online)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect on muscular strength after a 3-week training with the bench-press at a fixed pushing of 80–100% maximal speed (FPS) and self-selected pushing speed (SPS). 20 resistance-trained subjects were divided at random in 2 groups differing only regarding the pushing speed: in the FPS group (n=10) it was equal to 80–100% of the maximal speed while in the SPS group (n=10) the pushing speed was self-selected. Both groups were trained twice a week for 3 weeks with a load equal to 85% of 1RM and monitored with the encoder. Before and after the training we measured pushing speed and maximum load. Significant differences between and within the 2 groups were pointed out using a 2-way ANOVA for repeated measures. After 3 weeks a significant improvement was shown especially in the FPS group: the maximum load improved by 10.20% and the maximal speed by 2.22%, while in the SPS group the effect was <1%. This study shows that a high velocity training is required to increase the muscle strength further in subjects with a long training experience and this is possible by measuring the individual performance speed for each load.

 
  • References

  • 1 Ahtiainen JP, Hakkinen K. Strength athletes are capable to produce greater muscle activation and neural fatigue during high-intensity resistance exercise than nonathletes. J Strength Cond Res 2009; 23: 1129-1134
  • 2 Baker D. Acute effect of alternating heavy and light resistances on power output during upper-body complex power training. J Strength Cond Res 2003; 17: 493-497
  • 3 Baker D. Acute negative effect of a hypertrophy-oriented training bout on subsequent upper-body power output. J Strength Cond Res 2003; 17: 527-530
  • 4 Baker DG, Newton RU. Effect of kinetically altering a repetition via the use of chain resistance on velocity during the bench press. J Strength Cond Res 2009; 23: 1941-1946
  • 5 Bosquet L, Porta-benache J, Blais J. Validity of a commercial linear encoder to estimate bench press 1 RM from the force-velocity relationship. J Sports Sci Med 2010; 9: 459-463
  • 6 Brennecke A, Guimaraes TM, Leone R, Cadarci M, Mochizuki L, Simao R, Amadio AC, Serrao JC. Neuromuscular activity during bench press exercise performed with and without the preexhaustion method. J Strength Cond Res 2009; 23: 1933-1940
  • 7 Cronin J, McNair PJ, Marshall RN. Developing explosive power: a comparison of technique and training. J Sci Med Sport 2001; 4: 59-70
  • 8 Hakkinen K, Kraemer WJ, Newton RU, Alen M. Changes in electromyographic activity, muscle fibre and force production characteristics during heavy resistance/power strength training in middle-aged and older men and women. Acta Physiol Scand 2001; 171: 51-62
  • 9 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Update – Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research. Int J Sports Med 2011; 32: 819-821
  • 10 Henwood TR, Taaffe DR. Improved physical performance in older adults undertaking a short-term programme of high-velocity resistance training. Gerontology 2005; 51: 108-115
  • 11 Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Disselhorst-Klug C, Rau G. Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2000; 10: 361-374
  • 12 Hoff J, Helgerud J, Wisloff U. Maximal strength training improves work economy in trained female cross-country skiers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999; 31: 870-877
  • 13 Iglesias E, Boullosa DA, Dopico X, Carballeira E. Analysis of factors that influence the maximum number of repetitions in two upper-body resistance exercises: curl biceps and bench press. J Strength Cond Res 2010; 24: 1566-1572
  • 14 Izquierdo M, Hakkinen K, Gonzalez-Badillo JJ, Ibanez J, Gorostiaga EM. Effects of long-term training specificity on maximal strength and power of the upper and lower extremities in athletes from different sports. Eur J Appl Physiol 2002; 87: 264-271
  • 15 Kaneko M, Fuchimoto T, Toji H, Suei K. Training effects of different loads on the force velocity relationship and mechanical power output in human muscle. Scand J Sport Sci 1983; 5: 50-55
  • 16 Kidgell DJ, Stokes MA, Castricum TJ, Pearce AJ. Neurophysiological responses after short-term strength training of the biceps brachii muscle. J Strength Cond Res 2010; 24: 3123-3132
  • 17 Kim PS, Mayhew JL, Peterson DF. A modified YMCA bench press test as a predictor of 1 repetition maximum bench press strength. J Strength Cond Res 2002; 16: 440-445
  • 18 Koshida S, Urabe Y, Miyashita K, Iwai K, Kagimori A. Muscular outputs during dynamic bench press under stable versus unstable conditions. J Strength Cond Res 2008; 22: 1584-1588
  • 19 Kraemer WJ, Fry AC. Strength Testing: Development and Evaluation of Methodology. In: Maud P, Foster C. eds Physiological Assessment of Human Fitness. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 1995: 115-138
  • 20 Lagally KM, McCaw ST, Young GT, Medema HC, Thomas DQ. Ratings of perceived exertion and muscle activity during the bench press exercise in recreational and novice lifters. J Strength Cond Res 2004; 18: 359-364
  • 21 Lyons TS, McLester JR, Arnett SW, Thoma MJ. Specificity of training modalities on upper-body one repetition maximum performance: free weights vs. hammer strength equipment. J Strength Cond Res 2010; 24: 2984-2988
  • 22 Martins J, Tucci HT, Andrade R, Araujo RC, Bevilaqua-Grossi D, Oliveira AS. Electromyographic amplitude ratio of serratus anterior and upper trapezius muscles during modified push-ups and bench press exercises. J Strength Cond Res 2008; 22: 477-484
  • 23 Mayhew JL, Ware JS, Johns RA, Bemben MG. Changes in upper body power following heavy-resistance strength training in college men. Int J Sports Med 1997; 18: 516-520
  • 24 Miyaguchi K, Demura S. Relationships between stretch-shortening cycle performance and maximum muscle strength. J Strength Cond Res 2008; 22: 19-24
  • 25 Moras G, Rodriguez-Jimenez S, Busquets A, Tous-Fajardo J, Pozzo M, Mujika I. A metronome for controlling the mean velocity during the bench press exercise. J Strength Cond Res 2009; 23: 926-931
  • 26 Moritani T. Neuromuscular adaptations during the acquisition of muscle strength, power and motor tasks. J Biomech 1993; 26 (Suppl. 01) 95-107
  • 27 Sale DG, Martin JE, Moroz DE. Hypertrophy without increased isometric strength after weight training. Eur J Appl Physiol 1992; 64: 51-55
  • 28 Santana JC, Vera-Garcia FJ, McGill SM. A kinetic and electromyographic comparison of the standing cable press and bench press. J Strength Cond Res 2007; 21: 1271-1277
  • 29 Schmidtbleicher D, Haralambie G. Changes in contractile properties of muscle after strength training in man. Eur J Appl Physiol 1981; 46: 221-228
  • 30 Stock MS, Beck TW, Defreitas JM, Dillon MA. Test-retest reliability of barbell velocity during the free-weight bench-press exercise. J Strength Cond Res 2011; 25: 171-177
  • 31 Stone M, Plisk S, Collins D. Training principles: evaluation of modes and methods of resistance training – a coaching perspective. Sports Biomech 2002; 1: 79-103
  • 32 van den TR, Ettema G. A comparison of successful and unsuccessful attempts in maximal bench pressing. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009; 41: 2056-2063