Transzygomatic Approach with Intraoperative Neuromonitoring for Resection of Middle Cranial Fossa Tumors^[*]

Abstract

The authors reviewed the surgical experience and operative technique in a series of 11 patients with middle fossa tumors who underwent surgery using the transzygomatic approach and intraoperative neuromonitoring (IOM) at a single institution. This approach was applied to trigeminal schwannomas (n = 3), cavernous angiomas (n = 3), sphenoid wing meningiomas (n = 3), a petroclival meningioma (n = 1), and a hemangiopericytoma (n = 1). An osteotomy of the zygoma, a low-positioned frontotemporal craniotomy, removal of the remaining squamous temporal bone, and extradural drilling of the sphenoid wing made a flat trajectory to the skull base. Total resection was achieved in 9 of 11 patients. Significant motor pathway damage can be avoided using a change in motor-evoked potentials as an early warning sign. Four patients experienced cranial nerve palsies postoperatively, even though free-running electromyography of cranial nerves showed normal responses during the surgical procedure. A simple transzygomatic approach provides a wide surgical corridor for accessing the cavernous sinus, petrous apex, and subtemporal regions. Knowledge of the middle fossa structures is essential for anatomic orientation and avoiding injuries to neurovascular structures, although a neuronavigation system and IOM helps orient neurosurgeons.

Keywords

middle fossa approach - skull base surgery - motor-evoked potentials - intraoperative monitoring - neurophysiology

^* This article was originally Published online in Skull Base on December 1, 2011 (DOI:10.1055/s-0031-1296041)

• References

• 1 Honeybul S, Neil-Dwyer G, Evans BT, Lang DA. The transzygomatic approach: an anatomical study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997; 35 (5) 334-340
• 2 Schwartz MS, Anderson GJ, Horgan MA, Kellogg JX, McMenomey SO, Delashaw Jr JB. Quantification of increased exposure resulting from orbital rim and orbitozygomatic osteotomy via the frontotemporal transsylvian approach. J Neurosurg 1999; 91 (6) 1020-1026
• 3 Zhao JC, Liu JK. Transzygomatic extended middle fossa approach for upper petroclival skull base lesions. Neurosurg Focus 2008; 25 (6) E5-, discussion E5
• 4 Jellinek D, Jewkes D, Symon L. Noninvasive intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials under propofol anesthesia: effects of spinal surgery on the amplitude and latency of motor evoked potentials. Neurosurgery 1991; 29 (4) 551-557
• 5 Morota N, Deletis V, Constantini S, Kofler M, Cohen H, Epstein FJ. The role of motor evoked potentials during surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumors. Neurosurgery 1997; 41 (6) 1327-1336
• 6 Nagle KJ, Emerson RG, Adams DC , et al. Intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials: a review of 116 cases. Neurology 1996; 47 (4) 999-1004
• 7 Fukaya C, Katayama Y, Kasai M, Kurihara J, Yamamoto T. Intraoperative electro-oculographic monitoring for skull base surgery. Skull Base Surg 2000; 10 (1) 11-15
• 8 Schlake H-P, Goldbrunner RH, Milewski C , et al. Technical developments in intra-operative monitoring for the preservation of cranial motor nerves and hearing in skull base surgery. Neurol Res 1999; 21 (1) 11-24
• 9 Sekiya T, Hatayama T, Iwabuchi T, Maeda S. Intraoperative recordings of evoked extraocular muscle activities to monitor ocular motor nerve function. Neurosurgery 1993; 32 (2) 227-235, discussion 235
• 10 Neuloh G, Pechstein U, Cedzich C, Schramm J. Motor evoked potential monitoring with supratentorial surgery. Neurosurgery 2004; 54 (5) 1061-1070, discussion 1070–1072
• 11 Terasaka S, Sawamura Y, Goto S, Fukushima T. A lateral transzygomatic-transtemporal approach to the infratemporal fossa: technical note for mobilization of the second and third branches of the trigeminal nerve. Skull Base Surg 1999; 9 (4) 277-287
• 12 Zada G, Day JD, Giannotta SL. The extradural temporopolar approach: a review of indications and operative technique. Neurosurg Focus 2008; 25 (6) E3
• 13 Dayoub H, Schueler WB, Shakir H, Kimmell KT, Sincoff EH. The relationship between the zygomatic arch and the floor of the middle cranial fossa: a radiographic study. Neurosurgery 2010; ; 66 (6, Suppl Operative) 363-369
• 14 Kombos T, Suess O, Funk T, Kern BC, Brock M. Intra-operative mapping of the motor cortex during surgery in and around the motor cortex. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2000; 142 (3) 263-268
• 15 Kombos T, Suess O, Ciklatekerlio O, Brock M. Monitoring of intraoperative motor evoked potentials to increase the safety of surgery in and around the motor cortex. J Neurosurg 2001; 95 (4) 608-614
• 16 Zhou HH, Kelly PJ. Transcranial electrical motor evoked potential monitoring for brain tumor resection. Neurosurgery 2001; 48 (5) 1075-1080, discussion 1080–1081
• 17 al-Mefty O, Ayoubi S, Smith RR. The petrosal approach: indications, technique, and results. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 1991; 53: 166-170
• 18 Al-Mefty O, Fox JL, Smith RR. Petrosal approach for petroclival meningiomas. Neurosurgery 1988; 22 (3) 510-517
• 19 Alberti O, Sure U, Riegel T, Bertalanffy H. Image-guided placement of eye muscle electrodes for intraoperative cranial nerve monitoring. Neurosurgery 2001; 49 (3) 660-663, discussion 663–664
• 20 Harper CM, Daube JR. Facial nerve electromyography and other cranial nerve monitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol 1998; 15 (3) 206-216
• 21 Schlake HP, Goldbrunner R, Siebert M, Behr R, Roosen K. Intra-Operative electromyographic monitoring of extra-ocular motor nerves (Nn. III, VI) in skull base surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2001; 143 (3) 251-261
• 22 Harper CM. Intraoperative cranial nerve monitoring. Muscle Nerve 2004; 29 (3) 339-351
• 23 Harper CM, Harner SG, Slavit DH , et al. Effect of BAEP monitoring on hearing preservation during acoustic neuroma resection. Neurology 1992; 42 (8) 1551-1553
• 24 Harner SG, Daube JR, Ebersold MJ, Beatty CW. Improved preservation of facial nerve function with use of electrical monitoring during removal of acoustic neuromas. Mayo Clin Proc 1987; 62 (2) 92-102
• 25 Radtke RA, Erwin CW, Wilkins RH. Intraoperative brainstem auditory evoked potentials: significant decrease in postoperative morbidity. Neurology 1989; 39 (2 Pt 1) 187-191