Subscribe to RSS
Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/en/10.1055-s-00000077.xml
Download PDF
Semin Thromb Hemost 1995; 21(S 04): 086-090
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1313628
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1313628
Procoagulant and Anticoagulant Effects of Intravascular Contrast Media as Assessed by Thromboelastography
Authors
Further Information
Publication History
Publication Date:
09 May 2012 (online)
-
References
- 1 Osborne ED, Sutherland CG, Scroll Jr AJ, Rountree LG. Roentgenography of urinary tract during excretion of sodium iodide. JAMA 80: 368-373 1923;
- 2 Almén T. Contrast agent design: Some aspects on the synthesis of water soluble contrast agents of low osmolality. J Theor Biol 24: 216-226 1969;
- 3 King BF, Hartman GW, Williamson Jr B, LeRoy AJ, Hattery RR. Low-osmolality contrast media: a current perspective. Mayo Clin Proc 64: 976-985 1989;
- 4 Robertson HJF. Blood clot formation in angiographic syringes containing non-ionic contrast media. Radiology 162: 621-622 1987;
- 5 Kopko P, Smith DG, Bull BS. Thrombin generation in nonclottable mixtures of blood and nonionic contrast agents. Radiology 174: 459-461 1990;
- 6 Grollman JH, Chi C, Astone RA. Thromboembolic complications in coronary angiography associated with the use of non-ionic contrast media. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 14: 159-164 1988;
- 7 Gasparetti CM, Feldman MD, Burwell LR, Angello DA, Haugh KH, Own RM, Powers ER. Influence of contrast media on thrombus formation during coronary angioplasty. J Am Coli Cardiol 18: 433450 1991;
- 8 Grines CL, Diaz C, Mickelson J. Acute thrombosis in a canine model of arterial injury: Effect of ionic versus non-ionic contrast media. Circulation 80 (Suppl 2) 411 1989;
- 9 Hwang MH, Piao ZE, Murdock DK, Giardina J, Pacold I. The potential risk of thrombosis during angiography using non-ionic contrast media. (Abstr.) J Am Coli Cardiol 11: 55 1988;
- 10 McClennan BL. Low-osmolality contrast media, premises and promises. Radiology 162: 1-8 1987;
- 11 Wolf GL. Safer, more expensive iodinated contrast agents: How do we decide?. Radiology 154: 557-558 1986;
- 12 Committee on Drug and Contrast Media. The current efficacious use of water soluble contrast agents for intravascular injections. ACR Bull 44: 9-10 1988;
- 13 Bettman MA. Radiographic contrast agents—a perspective. (Editorial.) N Engl J Med 317: 891-893 1987;
- 14 Bagg MNJ, Horwitz TA, Bester L. Comparison of patient responses to high and low osmolality contrast agents injected intravenously. AJR 147: 185-187 1986;
- 15 Granger RG. Low osmolar contrast media. (Editorial.) Br M ed J 289: 144-145 1984;
- 16 Roberts CJ, Farron SC, Charney MC. How much can the NHS afford to spend to save a life or avoid a severe disability?. Lancet 1: 89-91 1985;
- 17 Fareed J, Walenga JM, Saravia GE, Moncada RM. Thrombogenic potential of non-ionic contrast media?. Radiology 174: 321-325 1990;
- 18 Parvez Z, Moncada R, Fareed J, Messmore HL. Effect of nonionic contrast media (CM) on the components of coagulation and complement systems. Invest Radiol 18: 279-284 1983;
- 19 Rasuli P. Blood clot formation in angiographic syringes containing non-ionic contrast media. (Letter.) Radiology 165: 582 1987;
- 20 Skalpe IO, Anke IM. Complications in cerebral angiography: A comparison between the non-ionic contrast medium iohexol and meglumine metrizoate. Neuroradiology 25: 157-160 1983;
- 21 Jacobson PD, Rosenquist CJ. The introduction of low osmolar contrast agents in radiology: Medical, economic, legal, and public policy issues. JAMA 260: 1586-1592 1988;