Multivariate Analysis in the Maximum Strength Performance

Abstract

This study performed an exploratory analysis of the anthropometrical and morphological muscle variables related to the one-repetition maximum (1RM) performance. In addition, the capacity of these variables to predict the force production was analyzed. 50 active males were submitted to the experimental procedures: vastus lateralis muscle biopsy, quadriceps magnetic resonance imaging, body mass assessment and 1RM test in the leg-press exercise. K-means cluster analysis was performed after obtaining the body mass, sum of the left and right quadriceps muscle cross-sectional area (∑CSA), percentage of the type II fibers and the 1RM performance. The number of clusters was defined a priori and then were labeled as high strength performance (HSP_1RM) group and low strength performance (LSP_1RM) group. Stepwise multiple regressions were performed by means of body mass, ∑CSA, percentage of the type II fibers and clusters as predictors’ variables and 1RM performance as response variable. The clusters mean±SD were: 292.8±52.1 kg, 84.7±17.9 kg, 19 249.7±1 645.5 mm² and 50.8±7.2% for the HSP_1RM and 254.0±51.1 kg, 69.2±8.1 kg, 15 483.1±1 104.8 mm² and 51.7±6.2%, for the LSP_1RM in the 1RM, body mass, ∑CSA and muscle fiber type II percentage, respectively. The most important variable in the clusters division was the ∑CSA. In addition, the ∑CSA and muscle fiber type II percentage explained the variance in the 1RM performance (Adj R²=0.35, p=0.0001) for all participants and for the LSP_1RM (Adj R²=0.25, p=0.002). For the HSP_1RM, only the ∑CSA was entered in the model and showed the highest capacity to explain the variance in the 1RM performance (Adj R²=0.38, p=0.01). As a conclusion, the muscle CSA was the most relevant variable to predict force production in individuals with no strength training background.

Key words

1RM - muscle biopsy - cross-sectional area - body mass

• References

• 1 Aagaard P, Andersen JL, Dyhre-Poulsen P, Leffers AM, Wagner A, Magnusson SP, Halkjaer-Kristensen J, Simonsen EB. A mechanism for increased contractile strength of human pennate muscle in response to strength training: changes in muscle architecture. J Physiol 2001; 534: 613-623
• 2 Abernethy P, Wilson G, Logan P. Strength and power assessment. Issues, controversies and challenges. Sports Med 1995; 19: 401-417
• 3 Baker D, Wilson G, Carlyon B. Generality versus specificity: a comparison of dynamic and isometric measures of strength and speed-strength. Eur J Appl Physiol 1994; 68: 350-355
• 4 Bamman MM, Petrella JK, Kim JS, Mayhew DL, Cross JM. Cluster analysis tests the importance of myogenic gene expression during myofiber hypertrophy in humans. J Appl Physiol 2007; 102: 2232-2239
• 5 Brooke MH, Kaiser KK. Muscle fiber types: how many and what kind?. Arch Neurol 1970; 23: 369-379
• 6 Brown LE, Weir JP. ASEP procedures recommendation I: accurate assessment of muscular strength and power. JEPonline 2001; 4: 1-21
• 7 Douris PC, White BP, Cullen RR, Keltz WE, Meli J, Mondiello DM, Wenger D. The relationship between maximal repetition performance and muscle fiber type as estimated by noninvasive technique in the quadriceps of untrained women. J Strength Cond Res 2006; 20: 699-703
• 8 Edman KA. Contractile performance of striated muscle. Adv Exp Med Biol 2010; 682: 7-40
• 9 Fry AC, Schilling BK, Staron RS, Hagerman FC, Hikida RS, Thrush JT. Muscle fiber characteristics and performance correlates of male Olympic-style weightlifters. J Strength Cond Res 2003; 17: 746-754
• 10 Fry AC, Webber JM, Weiss LW, Harber MP, Vaczi M, Pattison NA. Muscle fiber characteristics of competitive power lifters. J Strength Cond Res 2003; 17: 402-410
• 11 Hakkinen K, Hakkinen A. Muscle cross-sectional area, force production and relaxation characteristics in women at different ages. Eur J Appl Physiol 1991; 62: 410-414
• 12 Hakkinen K, Keskinen KL. Muscle cross-sectional area and voluntary force production characteristics in elite strength- and endurance-trained athletes and sprinters. Eur J Appl Physiol 1989; 59: 215-220
• 13 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Update – ethical standards in sport and exercise science research. Int J Sports Med 2011; 32: 819-821
• 14 Henwood TR, Riek S, Taaffe DR. Strength versus muscle power-specific resistance training in community-dwelling older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2008; 63: 83-91
• 15 Hunter SK, Critchlow A, Enoka RM. Muscle endurance is greater for old men compared with strength-matched young men. J Appl Physiol 2005; 99: 890-897
• 16 Izquierdo M, Ibanez J, Hakkinen K, Kraemer WJ, Ruesta M, Gorostiaga EM. Maximal strength and power, muscle mass, endurance and serum hormones in weightlifters and road cyclists. J Sports Sci 2004; 22: 465-478
• 17 Jones JH, Lindstedt SL. Limits to maximal performance. Annu Rev Physiol 1993; 55: 547-569
• 18 Kawakami Y, Abe T, Fukunaga T. Muscle-fiber pennation angles are greater in hypertrophied than in normal muscles. J Appl Physiol 1993; 74: 2740-2744
• 19 Kawakami Y, Abe T, Kuno SY, Fukunaga T. Training-induced changes in muscle architecture and specific tension. Eur J Appl Physiol 1995; 72: 37-43
• 20 Mayhew JL, Piper FC, Ware MS. Anthropometric correlates with strength performance among resistance trained athletes. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 1993; 33: 159-165
• 21 Prince FP, Hikida RS, Hagerman FC. Human muscle fiber types in power lifters, distance runners and untrained subjects. Pflugers Arch 1976; 363: 19-26
• 22 Reynolds JM, Gordon TJ, Robergs RA. Prediction of one repetition maximum strength from multiple repetition maximum testing and anthropometry. J Strength Cond Res 2006; 20: 584-592
• 23 Sanchez-Medina L, Perez CE, Gonzalez-Badillo JJ. Importance of the propulsive phase in strength assessment. Int J Sports Med 2010; 31: 123-129
• 24 Terzis G, Spengos K, Manta P, Sarris N, Georgiadis G. Fiber type composition and capillary density in relation to submaximal number of repetitions in resistance exercise. J Strength Cond Res 2008; 22: 845-850
• 25 Trappe SW, Trappe TA, Lee GA, Costill DL. Calf muscle strength in humans. Int J Sports Med 2001; 22: 186-191
• 26 Tricoli V, Lamas L, Carnevale R, Ugrinowitsch C. Short-term effects on lower-body functional power development: weightlifting vs. vertical jump training programs. J Strength Cond Res 2005; 19: 433-437
• 27 Widrick JJ, Trappe SW, Costill DL, Fitts RH. Force-velocity and force-power properties of single muscle fibers from elite master runners and sedentary men. Am J Physiol 1996; 271: C676-C683
• 28 Wisloff U, Castagna C, Helgerud J, Jones R, Hoff J. Strong correlation of maximal squat strength with sprint performance and vertical jump height in elite soccer players. Br J Sports Med 2004; 38: 285-288