Int J Angiol 2012; 21(04): 223-228
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1331159
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Looking for a Learning Curve in EVAR Based on the Zenith Stent Graft

Manfred Kalteis
1   Department of Cardiac, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen, Wels, Austria
,
Peter Benedikt
1   Department of Cardiac, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen, Wels, Austria
,
Florian Huber
1   Department of Cardiac, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen, Wels, Austria
,
Florian Haller
1   Department of Cardiac, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen, Wels, Austria
,
Manfred Kastner
2   Department of Interventional Radiology, Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen, Wels, Austria
,
Herbert Lugmayr
2   Department of Interventional Radiology, Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen, Wels, Austria
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
22 November 2012 (online)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to report the learning curve of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) based on the Zenith stent graft (Cook Medical Inc., Bloomington, IN). In the last 9 years, 101 patients were treated with a Zenith stent graft. To display the learning curve, a cumulative sum (CUSUM) failure analysis curve of the 30-day technical success rate was calculated. For detailed analysis, our EVAR patient cohort was chronologically divided into three groups. Technical and clinical results, basic patient parameters, and procedural data were compared. The CUSUM graph indicated an initial sharp rise within the first 35 cases and a plateau thereafter. The 30-day technical success rate significantly increased from the first to the second group (83 vs. 100%; p = 0.019), as did the primary technical success rate (66 vs. 97%; p = 0.001). EVAR based on the Zenith stent graft required ∼35 cases to reach a stably high rate of short-term technical success.

 
  • References

  • 1 Chaikof EL, Blankensteijn JD, Harris PL , et al; Ad Hoc Committee for Standardized Reporting Practices in Vascular Surgery of The Society for Vascular Surgery/American Association for Vascular Surgery. Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2002; 35 (5) 1048-1060
  • 2 Wohl H. The CUSUM plot: its utility in the analysis of clinical data. N Engl J Med 1977; 296 (18) 1044-1045
  • 3 Biau DJ, Resche-Rigon M, Godiris-Petit G, Nizard RS, Porcher R. Quality control of surgical and interventional procedures: a review of the CUSUM. Qual Saf Health Care 2007; 16 (3) 203-207
  • 4 Calsina L, Clará A, Vidal-Barraquer F. The use of the CUSUM chart method for surveillance of learning effects and quality of care in endovascular procedures. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011; 41 (5) 679-684
  • 5 Morton AP, Smith SE, Mullany DV, Clarke AJ, Wall D, Pohlner P. An application of outcomes monitoring for coronary artery bypass surgery 2005-2008 at TPCH. Heart Lung Circ 2011; 20 (5) 312-317
  • 6 Norris A, McCahon R. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) assessment and medical education: a square peg in a round hole. Anaesthesia 2011; 66 (4) 250-254
  • 7 Laheij RJ, van Marrewijk CJ, Buth J, Harris PL. EUROSTAR Collaborators. The influence of team experience on outcomes of endovascular stenting of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2002; 24 (2) 128-133
  • 8 Forbes TL, DeRose G, Kribs SW, Harris KA. Cumulative sum failure analysis of the learning curve with endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2004; 39 (1) 102-108
  • 9 Forbes TL, DeRose G, Lawlor DK, Harris KA. The association between a surgeon's learning curve with endovascular aortic aneurysm repair and previous institutional experience. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2007; 41 (1) 14-18