Download PDF
Der Klinikarzt 2012; 41(11): 514-521
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1331833
Schwerpunkt
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Prästationäre Diagnostik und Therapie des Akuten Koronarsyndroms – Kooperationen und Netzwerke zur gezielten Therapieeinleitung

Pre-hospital diagnostics and therapy for acute coronary syndrome – Cooperation and networks for targeted initiation of therapy
Jürgen Leick
1   Kerckhoff-Klinik, Herz- und Thoraxzentrum, Bad Nauheim
,
Helge Möllmann
1   Kerckhoff-Klinik, Herz- und Thoraxzentrum, Bad Nauheim
2   Medizinische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Gießen
,
Christian Hamm
1   Kerckhoff-Klinik, Herz- und Thoraxzentrum, Bad Nauheim
2   Medizinische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Gießen
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
29 November 2012 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Der akute Brustschmerz zählt zu einem der häufigsten Gründe einer prästationären Notfallversorgung. In 20–30 % der Fälle kann ein Akutes Koronarsyndrom (ACS) diagnostiziert werden. Anhand des EKGs, der Anamnese, der körperlichen Untersuchung sowie der Erhebung der Vitalparameter muss der Notarzt innerhalb von 10 Minuten eine Verdachtsdiagnose erstellen und eine Risikostratifizierung durchführen. Basierend auf der Evaluation im Rahmen des ersten medizinischen Kontakts (EMK) entscheidet sich das weitere logistische und therapeutische Vorgehen. Patienten mit einem ST-Streckenhebungsinfarkt (STEMI) sollten innerhalb den durch die Leitlinien definierten Zeitlimits einer geeigneten Reperfusionstherapie zugeführt werden. Nach aktueller Leitlinienempfehlung sollte eine durch ein erfahrenes Team durchgeführte Koronarangiografie mit Interventionsbereitschaft angestrebt werden. Patienten mit dem Verdacht auf ein ACS ohne ST-Elevation (NSTE-ACS) sind für weitere diagnostische und therapeutische Maßnahmen in die nächste Chest-Pain-Unit zu begleiten.

Acute-onset chest pain is one of the main causes for a medical emergency contact. About 20–30 % of patients with chest pain suffer from acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Immediate diagnostic work-up including clinical assessment, medical history, evaluation of vital signs and ECG, as well as early risk stratification are essential for the patients' prognosis. During the first medical contact (FMC) a working diagnosis should be made within 10 minutes. Based on this evaluation the patient should be directed to a further targeted treatment. Patients presenting with ischaemic symptoms and ST-segment (STEMI) elevation deserve a rapid reperfusion therapy with primary percutaneous coronary intervention being the first-line approach. Patients with the working diagnosis of a non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) should be admitted to a dedicated chest pain unit for further risk stratification and treatment.

Key words

Acute coronary syndrome - first medical contact - risk stratification - reperfusion therapy
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Ruigómez A, Rodríguez L, Wallander M et al. Chest pain in general practice: incidence, comorbidity and mortality. Fam Pract 2006; 23: 167-174
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Leick J, Vollert J, Möckel M, Radke P, C. Hamm. AG SOP Task Force Patientenpfade. Standard operating procedures to implement the guidelines for assessment of acute onset chest pain. Der Kardiologe 2011; 5: 443-457
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Amsterdam E, Kirk J, Bluemke D et al. Testing of Low-Risk Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Chest Pain. Circulation 2010; 122: 1756-1776
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Adnet F, Renault R, Jabre P et al. Incidence of acute myocardial infarction resulting in sudden death outside the hospital. Emerg Med J 2011; 28: 884-886
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Löwel H, Meisinger C, Heier M, Hörmann A. The population-based acute myocardial infarction (AMI) registry of the MONICA/KORA study region of Augsburg. Gesundheitswesen 2005; 67 (Suppl. 01) 31-37
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Hamm C, Bassand J, Agewall S et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2011; 32: 2999-3054
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Steg P, James S, Atar D et al. The Task Force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). European Heart Journal 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs215
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Liebetrau C, Szardien S, Rixe J et al. Direct admission versus transfer of AMI patients for primary PCI. Clin Res Cardiol 2011; 100: 217-225
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Diercks DB, Peacock WF, Hiestand BC et al. Frequency and consequences of recording an electrocardiogram. 10 minutes after arrival in an emergency room in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (from the CRUSADE Initiative). Am J Cardiol 2006; 97: 437-442
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Lopez-Sendon J, Coma-Canella I, Alcasena S et al. Electrocardiographic findings in acute right ventricular infarction: sensitivity and specificity of electrocardiographic alterations in right precordial leads V4R, V3R, V1, V2, and V3. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985; 6: 1273-1279
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Dhruva V, Abdelhadi S, Anis A et al. ST- Segment Analysis Using Wireless Technology in Acute Myocardial Infarction (STAT-MI) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 509-513
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Thygesen K, Alpert J, Jaffe A et al. Writing Group on behalf of the Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Eur Heart J doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs184
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kaul P, Fu Y, Chang W et al. Prognostic value of ST segment depression in acute cor- onary syndromes: insights from PARAGON-A applied to GUSTO-IIb. PARAGON-A and GUSTO IIb Investigators. Platelet IIb/IIIa Antagonism for the Reduction of Acute Global Organization Network. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38: 64-71
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 de Zwaan C, Bar F, Janssen J et al. Angiographic and clinical characteristics of patients with unstable angina showing an ECG pattern indicating critical narrowing of the proximal LAD coronary artery. Am Heart J 1989; 117: 657-665
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Luepker R, Raczynski J, Osganian S et al. Effect of a community intervention on patient delay and emergency medical service use in acute coronary heart disease: The Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (REACT) Trial. JAMA 2000; 284: 60-67
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Terkelsen C, Sorensen J, Maeng M et al. System delay and mortality among patients with STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA 2010; 304: 763-771
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Fox K, Garcia M, Ardissino D et al. Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: executive summary: the Task Force on the Management of Stable Angina Pectoris of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 1341-1381
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Wiviott S, Braunwald E, McCabe C et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2001-2015
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Wallentin L, Becker R, Budaj A et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 1045-1057
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Cannon C, Harrington R, James S et al. PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) investigators. Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in acute coronary syndromes patients with a planned invasive strategy (PLATO): a randomised double-blind study. Lancet 2010; 375: 283-293
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Yusuf S, Mehta SR, Chrolavicius S et al. Effects of fondaparinux on mortality and reinfarction in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the OASIS-6 randomized trial. JAMA 2006; 295: 1519-1530
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Achenbach S, Szardien S, Zeymer U, Gielen S, Hamm C. Kommentar zu den Leitlinien der Europäischen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie (ESC) zur Diagnostik und Therapie des akuten Koronarsyndroms ohne persistierende ST-Streckenhebung. Kardiologe DOI: DOI 10.1007/s12181-012-0436-5. 2012; 6
    PubMedGoogle Scholar