Minimally Invasive Revision of a C2 Isthmus Screw

Abstract

Objective We present a novel technique for minimally invasive revision of a cervical isthmic screw via two 18-mm transmuscular tubular accesses.

Methods A 55 year old male with combined anterior and posterior instrumentation after corpectomy of C3 to C4 complained of persistent neck pain and reduced head mobility in the follow-up examination. Isthmic screws had been placed in C2 and pedicle screws in C5. The system used is a versatile modular screw–rod system for the fixation of the occipito-cervico-thoracic spine. The patient's complaints were attributed to an inappropriately placed C2 isthmus screw. The screw was approximately 3 mm too long and perforated the C1–C2 facet joint on the left side. We replaced the screw by a shorter one through a minimally invasive transmuscular tubular approach.

Results The transmuscular tubular access offered an adequate exposure of the screw head. The special features of the versatile modular fixation device allowed for screw easing, removal, replacement, and tightening through the tube. The symptoms of the patient resolved completely. Intraoperative blood loss and postoperative approach–associated pain were negligible.

Conclusion We conclude that in case of dorsal cervical fixation with a versatile modular screw–rod system, a minimally invasive transmuscular approach for revision of an isthmic screw may be a good alternative to open surgery.

Keywords

minimally invasive - cervical spine - pedicle screw - isthmus screw - revision - modular fixation system

• References

• 1 Kosmopoulos V, Schizas C. Pedicle screw placement accuracy: a meta-analysis. Spine 2007; 32 (3) E111-E120
• 2 Richter M, Wilke HJ, Kluger P, Neller S, Claes L, Puhl W. Biomechanical evaluation of a new modular rod-screw implant system for posterior instrumentation of the occipito-cervical spine: in-vitro comparison with two established implant systems. Eur Spine J 2000; 9 (5) 417-425
• 3 Richter M. Posterior Instrumentation of the cervical spine for instability using the Neon Occipito-Cervical System. Part 1: atlanto-axial instrumentation. Oper Orthop Traumatol 2003; 15: 70-89
• 4 Richter M. Posterior instrumentation of the cervical spine using the neon occipito-cervical system. Part 2: cervical and cervicothoracic instrumentation. Oper Orthop Traumatol 2005; 17 (6) 579-600
• 5 Stoffel M, Behr M, Ringel F, Stuer C, Meyer B. Posterior instrumentation of the cervical spine with a versatile modular fixation system. Zentralbl Neurochir 2007; 68 (2) 50-58
• 6 Harms J, Melcher RP. Posterior C1-C2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation. Spine 2001; 26 (22) 2467-2471
• 7 Franke J, Greiner-Perth R, Boehm H , et al. Comparison of a minimally invasive procedure versus standard microscopic discotomy: a prospective randomised controlled clinical trial. Eur Spine J 2009; 18 (7) 992-1000
• 8 Kogias E, Vougioukas VI, Hubbe U, Halatsch ME. Minimally invasive approach for the treatment of lateral lumbar disc herniations. Technique and results. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2007; 50 (3) 160-162
• 9 Palmer S. Use of a tubular retractor system in microscopic lumbar discectomy: 1 year prospective results in 135 patients. Neurosurg Focus 2002; 13 (2) E5
• 10 Pirris SM, Dhall S, Mummaneni PV, Kanter AS. Minimally invasive approach to extraforaminal disc herniations at the lumbosacral junction using an operating microscope: case series and review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus 2008; 25 (2) E10
• 11 Holly LT, Schwender JD, Rouben DP, Foley KT. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: indications, technique, and complications. Neurosurg Focus 2006; 20 (3) E6
• 12 Cağlar YS, Bozkurt M, Kahilogullari G , et al. Keyhole approach for posterior cervical discectomy: experience on 84 patients. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2007; 50 (1) 7-11
• 13 Hilton Jr DL. Minimally invasive tubular access for posterior cervical foraminotomy with three-dimensional microscopic visualization and localization with anterior/posterior imaging. Spine J 2007; 7 (2) 154-158