Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg 2013; 29(03): 154-160
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1347004
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Innovations in Minimally Invasive Facial Treatments

José Roberto Parisi Jurado
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Leila Freire Rego Lima
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Isabela Peixoto Olivetti
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Helena Hotz Arroyo
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Ingrid Helena Lopes de Oliveira
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
12 June 2013 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Patients are seeking healthier lives, and at the same time their concern about having a beautiful face and maintaining a youthful appearance over time has increased. Traditionally, surgeries based on tissue resection and resurfacing were the focus in facial rejuvenation. Over the last decade, minimally invasive procedures have expanded exponentially because of the variety of cosmetic products available on the market and because patients are looking for a better appearance with nonincision methods. The understanding of the aging process, facial anatomy, and ideal proportions is extremely important for successful rejuvenation procedures. Also, neuromodulators, chemical peels, filler properties, correct indications, and effectiveness must be well known by the injector for favorable results. Therefore, knowledge of all facial cosmetic options and an adequate facial analysis are essential for a better performance. In this article, the authors review some different product options and show cases of minimally invasive cosmetic procedures for the face currently used.

Keywords

facial rejuvenation - minimally invasive - injectables - fillers - botulinum toxin
 

  • References

  • 1 Patel U, Fitzgerald R. Facial shaping: beyond lines and folds with fillers. J Drugs Dermatol 2010; 9 (8, Suppl ODAC Conf Pt 2) s129-s137
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Tollefson TT, Sykes JM. Computer imaging software for profile photograph analysis. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2007; 9: 113-119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Maas CS, Bapna S. Pins and needles: minimally invasive office techniques for facial rejuvenation. Facial Plast Surg 2009; 25: 260-269
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Gunter JP, Hackney FL. Clinical assessment and facial analysis. In: Gunter JP, Rohrich RJ, Adams WP, , eds. Dallas Rhinoplasty: Nasal Surgery by the Masters. Vol. 1. St. Louis, MO: Quality Medical Publishing Inc; 2007: 105-123
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Scott AB, Magoon EH, McNeer KW , et al. Botulinum treatment of childhood strabismus. Opthalmology 1990; 97 (11) 1434-1438
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Carruthers JDA, Carruthers JA. Treatment of glabellar frown lines with C. botulinum-A exotoxin. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1992; 18: 17-21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Matarasso SL, Glogau RG. Chemical face peels. Dermatol Clin 1991; 9: 131-150
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Buck II DW, Alam M, Kim JYS. Injectable fillers for facial rejuvenation: a review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62: 11-18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Carruthers J, Cohen SR, Joseph JH, Narins RS, Rubin M. The science and art of dermal fillers for soft-tissue augmentation. J Drugs Dermatol 2009; 8: 335-350
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Wollina U, Payne CR. Aging well—the role of minimally invasive aesthetic dermatological procedures in women over 65. J Cosmet Dermatol 2010; 9: 50-58
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar