Download PDF
Int J Sports Med 2014; 35(04): 310-315
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1348255
Training & Testing
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Reliability and Validity of a New Maximal Anaerobic Shuttle Running Test

W. Dardouri
1   Research Unit, School and University Sportive Practices and Performance, High Institute of Sports and Physical Education, Boulifa, Kef, Tunisia
,
Z. Gharbi
2   Tunisian Research Laboratory “Sport Performance Optimisation”, National Center of Medicine and Science in Sports (CNMSS), Tunis, Tunisia
,
M. A. Selmi
1   Research Unit, School and University Sportive Practices and Performance, High Institute of Sports and Physical Education, Boulifa, Kef, Tunisia
,
R. H. Sassi
3   Physical Education Department, Faculty of Education, King Abdulaziz University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
,
W. Moalla
4   High Institute of Sports Sciences, UR EM2S-ISSEPS, Sfax, Tunisia
,
K. Chamari
5   Aspetar, Qatar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Research and Education Centre, Doha, Qatar
,
N. Souissi
2   Tunisian Research Laboratory “Sport Performance Optimisation”, National Center of Medicine and Science in Sports (CNMSS), Tunis, Tunisia
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History



accepted after revision 24 April 2013

Publication Date:
30 September 2013 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The purpose of this study was twofold: first to assess the relative and absolute reliability of a new Maximal Anaerobic Shuttle Running Test (MASRT), and second to evaluate the criterion validity of the MASRT. 16 team sport players participated in this study. The velocity (VMASRT) and the number of shuttles achieved at volitional exhaustion were measured. To assess the reliability of the MASRT, each player performed the MASRT twice, on separate days. The criterion validity of the MASRT was determined by examining the relationship between MASRT indices and the Wingate test (WingT) performances. Results showed no difference between test–retest MASRT scores for VMASRT and the number of shuttles (P>0.05). The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) values for VMASRT and Shuttle number were 0.84 and 0.80, respectively. The coefficients of variation (CV) and the mean difference (bias)±the 95% limits of agreement for the same variables were 3.6 and 12.9%, and 0.02±0.37m·s−1 and 0.3±6.7, respectively. The strongest correlation was found between mean power output relative to body mass (MPO) measured during the WingT and VMASRT (r=0.77, P<0.001). The MASRT constitutes a reliable and valid field tool for assessing short term repeated running capacity of team sport players.

Key words

intermittent sports - anaerobic performance - Wingate test - velocity running
 

  • References

  • 1 Aziz AR, Teh KC. Correlations between tests of running repeated sprint ability and anaérobic capacity by wingate cycling in multi-sprint sport athletes. Int J Appl Sports Sci 2004; 16: 14-22
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Baker JS, Davies B. Influence of body mass on resistive force selection during high intensity cycle ergometry: interrelationships between laboratory and field measures of performance. J Exerc Physiol 2004; 7: 44-51
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Bar-Or O. The Wingate anaerobic test. An update on methodology, reliability and validity. Sports Med 1987; 4: 381-394
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bland J, Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurements. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-310
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Boddington MK, Lambert MI, Waldeck MR. Validity of a 5-meter multiple shuttle run test for assessing fitness of women field hockey players. J Strength Cond Res 2004; 18: 97-100
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Brughelli M, Cronin J, Levin G, Chaouachi A. Understanding change of direction ability in sport: a review of resistance training studies. Sports Med 2008; 38: 1045-1063
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Cooper SM, Baker JS, Eaton ZE, Matthews N. A simple multistage field test for the prediction of anaerobic capacity in female games players. Br J Sports Med 2004; 38: 784-789
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Cowley PM, Swensen TC. Development and reliability of two core stability field tests. J Strength Cond Res 2008; 22: 619-624
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Delextrat A, Cohen D. Strength, power, speed, and agility of women basketball players according to playing position. J Strength Cond Res 2009; 23: 1974-1981
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Delextrat A, Cohen D. Physiological testing of basketball players: toward a standard evaluation of anaerobic fitness. J Strength Cond Res 2008; 22: 1066-1072
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Glaister M. Multiple sprint work. Physiological responses, mechanisms of fatigue and the influence of aerobic fitness. Sports Med 2005; 35: 757-777
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Granier P, Mercier B, Mercier J, Anselme F, Préfaut C. Aerobic and anaerobic contribution to Wingate test performance in sprint and middle-distance runners. Eur J Appl Physiol 1995; 70: 58-65
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Haj-Sassi R, Dardouri W, Gharbi Z, Chaouachi A, Mansour H, Rabhi A, Mahfoudhi ME. Reliability and validity of a new repeated agility test as a measure of anaerobic and explosive power. J Strength Cond Res 2011; 25: 472-480
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Harriss D, Atkinson G. Update – ethical standards in sport and exercise science research. Int J Sports Med 2011; 32: 819-821
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Hopkins WG, Schabort EJ, Hawley JA. Reliability of power in physical performance tests. Sports Med 2001; 31: 211-234
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hopkins WG. Measures of reliability in sport medicine and science. Sports Med 2000; 30: 1-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Impellizzeri FM, Marcora SM. Test validation in sport physiology: Lessons learned from clinimetrics. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2009; 4: 269-277
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Legaz-Arrese A, Munguía-Izquierdo D, Carranza-García LE, Torres-Dávila CG. Validity of the Wingate anaerobic test for the evaluation of elite runners. J Strength Cond Res 2011; 25: 819-824
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Léger LA, Lambert J. A maximal multistage 20 m shuttle run test to predict VO2max. Eur J Appl Physiol 1982; 49: 1-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Matthew D, Delextrat A. Heart rate, blood lactate concentration, and time-motion analysis of female basketball players during competition. J Sports Sci 2009; 27: 813-821
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Meckel Y, Machnai O, Eliakim A. Relationship among repeated sprint tests, aerobic fitness, and anaerobic fitness in elite adolescent soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 2009; 23: 163-169
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Montgomery DL. Physiological profile of professional hockey players – a longitudinal study. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2006; 31: 181-185
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Mooney MG, Hunter JR, O’Brien BJ, Berry JT, Young WB. Reliability and validity of novel intermittent peak running speed test for Australian football. J Strength Cond Res 2011; 25: 973-979
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Nevill A, Atkinson G. Assessing agreement between measurements recorded on a ratio scale in sports medicine and sports science. Br J Sports Med 1997; 31: 314-318
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Nummela A, Hämäläinen I, Rusko H. Comparison of maximal anaerobic running tests on a treadmill and track. J Sports Sci 2007; 25: 87-96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Nummela A, Alberts M, Rijntjes RP, Luhtanen P, Rusko H. Reliability and validity of the maximal anaerobic running test. Int J Sports Med 1996; 17: S97-S102
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Pearson DT, Naughton GA, Torode M. Predictability of physiological testing and the role of maturation in talent identification for adolescent team sports. J Sci Med Sport 2006; 9: 277-287
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Popadic Gacesa JZ, Barak OF, Grujic NG. Maximal anaerobic power test in athletes of different sport disciplines. J Strength Cond Res 2009; 23: 751-755
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Ramsbottom R, Nevill ME, Nevill AM, Hazeldine R. Accumulated oxygen deficit and shuttle run performance in physically active men and women. J Sports Sci 1997; 15: 207-214
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Rusko H, Nummela A, Mero A. A new method for the evaluation of anaerobic running power in athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol 1993; 66: 97-101
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Stolen T, Chamari K, Castagna C, Wisloff U. Physiology of soccer: An update. Sports Med 2005; 35: 501-536
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Vincent WJ. Statistics in kinesiology. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1995
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Wragg CB, Maxwell NS, Doust JH. Evaluation of the reliability and validity of a soccer-specific field test of repeated sprint ability. Eur J Appl Physiol 2000; 83: 77-83
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Zacharogiannis E, Paradisis G, Tziortzis S. An evaluation of tests of anaerobic power and capacity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36: S116
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Zagatto A, Redkva P, Loures J, Kalva Filho C, Franco V, Kaminagakura E, Papoti M. Anaerobic contribution during maximal anaerobic running test: correlation with maximal accumulated oxygen deficit. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2011; 21: e 222-e 230
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Zagatto AM, Beck WR, Gobatto CA. Validity of the running anaerobic sprint test for assessing anaerobic power and predicting short-distance performances. J Strength Cond Res 2009; 23: 1820-1827
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Zupan MF, Arata AW, Dawson LH, Wile AL, Payn TL, Hannon ME. Wingate Anaerobic Test peak power and anaerobic capacity classifications for men and women intercollegiate athletes. J Strength Cond Res 2009; 23: 2598-2604
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar