Abstract
Background Some controlled trials have shown significant differences in short-term clinical
outcomes between poractant alfa and beractant in infants with respiratory distress
syndrome (RDS). There is, however, no study showing the differences in long-term outcomes
with these treatments.
Aim To determine and compare the neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm infants with
RDS treated with poractant alfa or beractant at 2 years of age.
Methods This was a prospective, longitudinal, single-center cohort study of infants born
at ≤1,500 g and/or ≤32 weeks between 2008 and 2009 who received either poractant alfa
(n = 113) or beractant (n = 102) for RDS. Neurological and developmental assessments were performed at a corrected
age of 18 to 24 months.
Results About 33 of 113 infants (29.2%) in the poractant alfa group had neurodevelopmental
impairment compared with 36 of 102 (35.2%) in the beractant group, and the results
did not differ between the groups (p = 0.339). Similarly, no significant difference was found in the percentage of infants
with cerebral palsy (11.5 vs. 16.7%, respectively; p = 0.275).
Conclusion Our findings suggest that poractant alfa and beractant are similar in terms of neurodevelopmental
outcomes when used for the treatment of RDS in preterm infants.
Keywords
respiratory distress syndrome - poractant alfa - beractant - neurodevelopmental outcome