Am J Perinatol 2014; 31(06): 463-468
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1351659
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Very Low Birth Weight Preterm Infants Treated With Poractant Alfa versus Beractant for Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Zeynep Eras
1   Department of Neonatology, Zekai Tahir Burak Maternity Teaching Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
,
Evrim Alyamac Dizdar
1   Department of Neonatology, Zekai Tahir Burak Maternity Teaching Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
,
Gozde Kanmaz
1   Department of Neonatology, Zekai Tahir Burak Maternity Teaching Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
,
Nilufer Guzoglu
1   Department of Neonatology, Zekai Tahir Burak Maternity Teaching Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
,
Hatice Tatar Aksoy
1   Department of Neonatology, Zekai Tahir Burak Maternity Teaching Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
,
Gokce Baykal Altunkaya
1   Department of Neonatology, Zekai Tahir Burak Maternity Teaching Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
,
Fuat Emre Canpolat
1   Department of Neonatology, Zekai Tahir Burak Maternity Teaching Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
,
Ugur Dilmen
1   Department of Neonatology, Zekai Tahir Burak Maternity Teaching Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
2   Department of Pediatrics, Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara, Turkey
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

19 March 2013

11 June 2013

Publication Date:
24 July 2013 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Background Some controlled trials have shown significant differences in short-term clinical outcomes between poractant alfa and beractant in infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). There is, however, no study showing the differences in long-term outcomes with these treatments.

Aim To determine and compare the neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm infants with RDS treated with poractant alfa or beractant at 2 years of age.

Methods This was a prospective, longitudinal, single-center cohort study of infants born at ≤1,500 g and/or ≤32 weeks between 2008 and 2009 who received either poractant alfa (n = 113) or beractant (n = 102) for RDS. Neurological and developmental assessments were performed at a corrected age of 18 to 24 months.

Results About 33 of 113 infants (29.2%) in the poractant alfa group had neurodevelopmental impairment compared with 36 of 102 (35.2%) in the beractant group, and the results did not differ between the groups (p = 0.339). Similarly, no significant difference was found in the percentage of infants with cerebral palsy (11.5 vs. 16.7%, respectively; p = 0.275).

Conclusion Our findings suggest that poractant alfa and beractant are similar in terms of neurodevelopmental outcomes when used for the treatment of RDS in preterm infants.

Note

There are no previous publications or submissions with any overlapping information, including studies and patients.


A statement that the article will not be submitted to any other journal while it is under consideration by American Journal of Perinatology.


Dr. Zeynep Eras had primary responsibility for protocol development, patient screening, enrollment, outcome assessment, preliminary data analysis, and writing the article.


Drs. Evrim Dizdar, Gözde Kanmaz, and Nilufer Guzoglu participated in the development of the protocol and analytical framework for the study and contributed to the writing of the article. Dr. Hatice Tatar Aksoy and child development specialist Gokce Baykal Altunkaya were responsible for patient screening. Dr. Fuat Emre Canpolat and Dr. Ugur Dilmen supervised the design and execution of the study, performed the final data analyses, and contributed to the writing of the article.


A statement that each author listed on the article has seen and approved the submission of this version of the article and takes full responsibility for it. We have no conflict of interest. No financial support was taken for this study.