Frauenheilkunde up2date, Inhaltsverzeichnis Frauenheilkunde up2date 2015; 9(04): 275-289DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1358170 Geburtshilfe und Perinatalmedizin Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New YorkZustand nach Sectio: Management und bildgebende Diagnostik Authors Janine Hoffmann Holger Stepan Artikel empfehlen Abstract Alle Artikel dieser Rubrik(opens in new window) Volltext Referenzen Literatur 1 Abalos E, Addo V, Brocklehurst P et al. Caesarean section surgical techniques (CORONIS): a fractional, factorial, unmasked, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2013; 382: 234-248 2 Hemminki E, Meriläinen J. Long-term effects of cesarean sections: ectopic pregnancies and placental problems. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174: 1569-1574 3 Jurkovic D, Hillaby K, Woelfer B et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 310 4 Seow KM, Huang LW, Lin YH et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 23: 247-253 5 Ash A, Smith A, Maxwell D. Caesarean scar pregnancy. BJOG 2007; 114: 253-263 6 Wu X, Xue X, Wu X et al. Combined laparoscopy and hysteroscopy vs. uterine curettage in the uterine artery embolization-based management of cesarean scar pregnancy: a cohort study. Int J Clin Experimental Med 2014; 7: 2793-2803 7 Xiao J, Zhang S, Wang F et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy: noninvasive and effective treatment with high-intensity focused ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211: 356.e1-356.e7 8 Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Vintzileos AM. The association of placenta previa with history of cesarean delivery and abortion: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 1071-1078 9 Belfort MA. Placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 430-439 10 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe e. V.. Leitlinien, Empfehlungen, Stellungnahmen (Stand 2010): Schwangerenbetreuung und Geburtseinleitung bei Zustand nach Kaiserschnitt. AWMF 015/021 (S1). 11 Mar WA, Berggruen S, Atueyi U et al. Ultrasound imaging of placenta accreta with MR correlation. Ultrasound Q 2015; 31: 23-33 12 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe e. V.. Leitlinien, Empfehlungen, Stellungnahmen (Stand 2010): Plazentationsstörungen bei Status nach Sectio. Risk-Management zur Vermeidung von Müttersterbefällen. AWMF 015/046. 13 Riteau A, Tassin M, Chambon G et al. Accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of placenta accreta. PloS One 2014; 9: e94866 14 DʼAntonio F, Iacovella C, Bhide A. Prenatal identification of invasive placentation using ultrasound: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42: 509-517 15 DʼAntonio F, Iacovella C, Palacios-Jaraquemada J et al. Prenatal identification of invasive placentation using magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 44: 8-16 16 Meng X, Xie L, Song W. Comparing the diagnostic value of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for placenta accreta: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol 2013; 39: 1958-1965 17 Valentin L. Prediction of scar integrity and vaginal birth after caesarean delivery. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2013; 27: 285-295 18 Rozenberg P, Goffinet F, Philippe HJ et al. Thickness of the lower uterine segment: its influence in the management of patients with previous cesarean sections. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1999; 87: 39-45 19 Kok N, Wiersma IC, Opmeer BC et al. Sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness to predict uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with previous Cesarean section: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42: 132-139 20 Jastrow N, Antonelli E, Robyr R et al. Inter- and intraobserver variability in sonographic measurement of the lower uterine segment after a previous Cesarean section. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 420-424 21 Rozenberg P, Goffinet F, Phillippe HJ et al. Ultrasonographic measurement of lower uterine segment to assess risk of defects of scarred uterus. Lancet 1996; 347: 281-284 22 Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2581-2589 23 Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR et al. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 3-8 24 Tahseen S, Griffiths M. Vaginal birth after two caesarean sections (VBAC-2)-a systematic review with meta-analysis of success rate and adverse outcomes of VBAC-2 versus VBAC-1 and repeat (third) caesarean sections. BJOG 2010; 117: 5-19