Pneumologie 2014; 68(02): 100-105
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1359025
Originalarbeit
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Unilaterale Lungenvolumenreduktion mit intrabronchialen Ventilen nach Selektion mittels endoskopischer Kollateralventilationsmessung

Unilateral Reduction of Lung Volume by Application of Intrabronchial Valves on Patients Selected after Endoscopic Collateral Ventilation Assessment
K.-J. Franke
Klinik für Pneumologie und Beatmungsmedizin, Helios Klinik Ambrock, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Lehrstuhl für Innere Medizin I, Hagen
,
G. Nilius
Klinik für Pneumologie und Beatmungsmedizin, Helios Klinik Ambrock, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Lehrstuhl für Innere Medizin I, Hagen
,
U. Domanski
Klinik für Pneumologie und Beatmungsmedizin, Helios Klinik Ambrock, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Lehrstuhl für Innere Medizin I, Hagen
,
K.-H. Rühle
Klinik für Pneumologie und Beatmungsmedizin, Helios Klinik Ambrock, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Lehrstuhl für Innere Medizin I, Hagen
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

eingereicht24 September 2013

akzeptiert nach Revision07 November 2013

Publication Date:
16 December 2013 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund: Mittels endoskopischer Kollateralventilationsmessung (ECVA) können Emphysempatienten für eine Ventilanlage zur Lungenvolumenreduktion selektiert werden. Wünschenswert ist eine post interventionell resultierende, klinisch relevante Verbesserung der körperlichen Leistungsfähigkeit der selektierten Klientel.

Methode: Patienten mit einer fortgeschrittenen COPD wurden einem Screening zur Lungenvolumenreduktion unterzogen. Selektierte Patienten erhielten eine ECVA, bei Patienten mit einem Anstieg des Kollateralwiderstandes Rkoll auf > 10 cmH2O/(ml/s) innerhalb einer Messdauer von bis zu 300 s wurden unilateral lobär intrabronchiale Ventile (IBV) platziert. Die Differenzen ?>von Residualvolumen (RV) und Gehstrecke im 6-Minuten-Gehtest (6MWT) zwischen den Zeitpunkten TX (nach Ventilanlage) minus T1 (vor Ventilanlage) wurden errechnet.

Ergebnisse: Von 310 Emphysempatienten erfüllten 17 die Kriterien zur ECVA, 10/17 eigneten sich zur Ventilanlage. Nach 312 ± 170 Tagen (TX-T1) betrug die Zunahme der Gehstrecke 44 ± 89,7 m, 7/10 Patienten profitierten klinisch relevant (> 25 m). Die RV-Differenz korrelierte mit der Gehstreckendifferenz, nicht aber mit der ECVA-Messdauer.

Schlussfolgerungen: Nur ein geringer Teil der Patienten mit einem fortgeschrittenen Lungenemphysem scheint für eine endoskopische Lungenvolumenreduktion mittels Ventilanlage in Frage zu kommen. Eine unilaterale lobäre IBV-Anlage kann zu einer dauerhaften, klinisch relevanten Verbesserung der körperlichen Leistungsfähigkeit führen. Die ECVA-Messdauer sollte zumindest 300 s betragen.

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic collateral ventilation assessment (ECVA) can be used to select patients suffering from emphysema for application of valves to achieve a reduction of lung volume. The objective is to obtain a post-operatively minimal clinically important improvement of the selected patient’s physical capacity.

Methods: Patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) underwent examination for a possible reduction of lung volume. Those selected got ECVA. Patients whose collateral resistance (Rcoll) increased to Rcoll > 10 cm H2O/(mL/s) within a measurement duration of up to 300 s, were submitted to unilateral lobar application of intrabronchial valves (IBV). Differences in residual volume (RV) as well as distances in 6 minute walk tests (6MWT) between the time after application of valves (TX) and that before (T1) were calculated (TX minus T1).

Results: Of a tested 310 emphysema patients, 17 met criteria allowing ECVA; 10 of 17 proved eligible for valve application. After 312 ± 170 days (TX – T1) the increase in walking distance was 44 ± 89.7 m; 7 of 10 patients achieved clinically relevant improvements (> 25 m). Differences in RV proved to correlate with differences in walking distances, but not yet with differences in measurement duration in ECVA.

Conclusions: Only a small portion of patients with progressive emphysema of the lung seem suitable for endoscopic reduction of lung volume by application of valves. Unilateral lobar application of IBV can result in durable, clinically relevant improvements of the patient’s physical capacity. ECVA measurements should take a minimum of 300 s.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Toma TP, Hopkinson NS, Hillier J et al. Bronchoscopic volume reduction with valve implants in patients with severe emphysema. Lancet 2003; 361: 931-933
  • 2 Snell GI, Holsworth L, Borrill ZL et al. The potential for bronchoscopic lung volume reduction using bronchial prostheses: a pilot study. Chest 2003; 124: 1073-1080
  • 3 Venuta F, de Giacomo T, Rendina EA et al. Bronchoscopic lung-volume reduction with one-way valves in patients with heterogenous emphysema. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 79: 411-416 ; discussion 416 – 417
  • 4 Sciurba FC, Ernst A, Herth FJ et al. VENT Study Research Group. A randomized study of endobronchial valves for advanced emphysema. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 1233-1244
  • 5 Ninane V, Geltner C, Bezzi M et al. Multicentre European study for the treatment of advanced emphysema with bronchial valves. Eur Respir J 2012; 39: 1319-1325
  • 6 Hartman JE, Ten Hacken NH, Klooster K et al. The minimal important difference for residual volume in patients with severe emphysema. Eur Respir J 2012; 40: 1137-1141
  • 7 Herth FJ, Noppen M, Valipour A et al. International VENT Study Group. Efficacy predictors of lung volume reduction with Zephyr valves in a European cohort. Eur Respir J 2012; 39: 1334-1342
  • 8 Hopkinson NS, Kemp SV, Toma TP et al. Atelectasis and survival after bronchoscopic lung volume reduction for COPD. Eur Respir J 2011; 37: 1346-1351
  • 9 Venuta F, Anile M, Diso D et al. Long-term follow-up after bronchoscopic lung volume reduction in patients with emphysema. Eur Respir J 2012; 39: 1084-1089
  • 10 Garcia-Aymerich J, Lange P, Benet M et al. Regular physical activity reduces hospital admission and mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a population based cohort study. Thorax 2006; 61: 772-778
  • 11 Eberhardt R, Gompelmann D, Schuhmann M et al. Complete unilateral vs partial bilateral endoscopic lung volume reduction in patients with bilateral lung emphysema. Chest 2012; 142: 900-908
  • 12 Aljuri N, Freitag L. Validation and pilot clinical study of a new bronchoscopic method to measure collateral ventilation before endobronchial lung volume reduction. J Appl Physiol 2009; 106: 774-783
  • 13 Gompelmann D, Eberhardt R, Michaud G et al. Predicting atelectasis by assessment of collateral ventilation prior to endobronchial lung volume reduction: a feasibility study. Respiration 2010; 80: 419-425
  • 14 Herth FJ, Eberhardt R, Gompelmann D et al. Radiological and clinical outcomes of using Chartis™ to plan endobronchial valve treatment. Eur Respir J 2013; 41: 302-308
  • 15 Slebos DJ, Klooster K, Ernst A et al. Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction coil treatment of patients with severe heterogeneous emphysema. Chest 2012; 142: 574-582
  • 16 Springmeyer SC, Bolliger CT, Waddell TK et al. IBV Valve Pilot Trials Research Teams. Treatment of heterogeneous emphysema using the spiration IBV valves. Thorac Surg Clin 2009; 19: 247-253 ix-x
  • 17 Sterman DH, Mehta AC, Wood DE et al. IBV Valve US Pilot Trial Research Team. A multicenter pilot study of a bronchial valve for the treatment of severe emphysema. Respiration 2010; 79: 222-233
  • 18 Redelmeier DA, Bayoumi AM, Goldstein RS et al. Interpreting small differences in functional status: the Six Minute Walk test in chronic lung disease patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997; 155: 1278-1282
  • 19 ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 166: 111-117
  • 20 Brooks D, Solway S, Gibbons WJ. ATS statement on six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003; 167: 1287
  • 21 Verrill DE, Fox L, Moore JB et al. Validity and reliability of the North Carolina 6-minute cycle test. J Cardiopulm Rehabil 2006; 26: 224-230
  • 22 Puhan MA, Chandra D, Mosenifar Z et al. National Emphysema Treatment Trial (NETT) Research Group. The minimal important difference of exercise tests in severe COPD. Eur Respir J 2011; 37: 784-790
  • 23 Celli BR, Cote CG, Marin JM et al. The body-mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity index in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 1005-1012
  • 24 Cote CG, Celli BR. Pulmonary rehabilitation and the BODE index in COPD. Eur Respir J 2005; 26: 630-636
  • 25 Imfeld S, Bloch KE, Weder W et al. The BODE index after lung volume reduction surgery correlates with survival. Chest 2006; 129: 873-878
  • 26 Martinez FJ, Han MK, Andrei AC et al. National Emphysema Treatment Trial Research Group. Longitudinal change in the BODE index predicts mortality in severe emphysema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008; 178: 491-499
  • 27 Puhan MA, Garcia-Aymerich J, Frey M et al. Expansion of the prognostic assessment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the updated BODE index and the ADO index. Lancet 2009; 374: 704-711
  • 28 Kramer MR, Refaely Y, Maimon N et al. Bilateral endoscopic sealant lung volume reduction therapy for advanced emphysema. Chest 2012; 142: 1111-1117
  • 29 Noppen M. Collateral ventilation in end-stage emphysema: a blessing or a curse for new bronchoscopic treatment approaches (or both)?. Respiration 2007; 74: 493-495