Download PDF
Sportverletz Sportschaden 2014; 28(3): 146-154
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1366540
Originalarbeit
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Intraobserverreliabilität des handballspezifischen Komplextests (HBKT)

Intraobserver Reliability of the Handball-Specific Complex Test (HBKT)
R. Schwesig
1   Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Department für Orthopädie, Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Halle (Saale)
,
A. Koke
2   Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Department Sportwissenschaft, Halle (Saale)
,
P. Jungermann
1   Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Department für Orthopädie, Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Halle (Saale)
,
D. Fischer
2   Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Department Sportwissenschaft, Halle (Saale)
,
F. Noack
3   Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin I, Schwerpunkt Pneumologie, Halle (Saale)
,
S. Becker
4   Direktor Institute for Musculoskeletal Analysis, Research and Therapy, Leiter Wirbelsäulenforschung Ludwig Boltzmann Institut für Experimentelle und klinische Traumatologie Austrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Wien, Österreich
,
G. Fieseler
5   Zentrum Orthopädische Chirurgie (ZOC), Hannoversch Münden
,
K.-S. Delank
1   Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Department für Orthopädie, Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Halle (Saale)
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
22 May 2014 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

See also:

Liebe Leserin, lieber Leser,Sportverletz Sportschaden 2014; 28(03): e3-e3
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1394313

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund: Aktuell ist im Handball ein eklatanter Mangel hinsichtlich komplexer, sportartspezifischer Tests zu verzeichnen. Bislang wurde kein handballspezifischer Komplextest entwickelt und bezüglich seiner Intraobserverreliabilität (IR) geprüft.

Fragestellung: Ziel der Untersuchung war es, die IR des handballspezifischen Komplextests (HBKT) zu ermitteln.

Methodik: Zwei Teams der 3. Liga (n = 30; Alter: 25,7 ± 3,9 Jahre, Range: 19 – 33 Jahre) wurden im Abstand von zwei Tagen mit dem HBKT untersucht. Innerhalb des HBKT wurden die Beanspruchungsparameter Laktat und Herzfrequenz sowie die Belastungsparameter Zeit, Wurfgeschwindigkeit und Fehleranzahl erhoben.

Ergebnisse: 36 % (3/13) der Beanspruchungsparameter wiesen eine hohe relative (ICC > 0,75) und absolute (CV ≤ 5 %) IR auf. Im Mittel war eine ausreichende (ICC = 0,67, CV = 11,3 %) IR zu beobachten. Diese steigt signifikant (ICC = 0,72, CV = 6,3 %), wenn die Parameter „technische Fehler“ und „Fehlwürfe“ nicht in die statistische Analyse eingehen. Die Herzfrequenz war reliabler als der Parameter Laktat (∅ICC = 0,71 & ∅CV = 4,23 vs. ∅ICC = 0,65 & ∅CV = 15,1 %). Hinsichtlich der Belastungsparameter konnte in Runde 1 des HBKT für 50 % (5/10) und in Runde 2 für 40 % der Parameter eine hohe IR ermittelt werden. Im Mittel war die IR der Parameter in Runde 1 höher als in Runde 2 (∅ICC = 0,71 & ∅CV = 12,2 % vs. ∅ICC = 0,60 & ∅CV = 14,3 %). Tendenziell verbesserten sich die Sportler in den Beanspruchungs- und Belastungsparametern vom Messzeitpunkt (MZP) 1 zum MZP 2.

Schlussfolgerung: Der HBKT besitzt eine ausreichende IR. Ohne die Parameter Fehlwürfe und technische Fehler erhöht sich die IR indes deutlich. Deshalb sollten diese Parameter im Interesse der Standardisierung des HBKT zwar erfasst, jedoch nicht in die statistische Analyse einbezogen werden. Die Sportler sollten im Vorfeld intensiv mit dem HBKT bekannt gemacht werden. Ansonsten besteht bei der Interpretation der Testdaten die Gefahr, dass Trainingseffekte überschätzt werden. Überdies kann das Testkonzept des HBKT als Grundlage für die Entwicklung von sportartspezifischen Tests in anderen Spielsportarten (z. B. Fußball, Basketball) dienen. Beispielhaft sei an dieser Stelle auf den Fußballspezifischen Komplextest (FBKT) verwiesen [1].

Abstract

Background: There are clearly no complex and sports-specific tests in handball. So far, no specific complex test has been developed and verified for its intraobserver reliability (IR).

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the IR of the Handball-specific complex test (HBKT).

Methods: The HBKT was applied twice at an interval of two days to two teams of the German Third League (n = 30; age 25.7 ± 3.9 years, range: 19 – 33 years). Within the HBKT, the stress parameters lactate and heart rate as well as the loading parameters time, throwing velocity and number of errors were collected.

Results: Overall, 23 % (3/13) of the stress parameters showed a high relative [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) > 0.75] and absolute [coefficient of variation (CV) ≤ 5 %] IR. On average, a sufficient absolute (∅CV = 11.3 %) and relative (∅ICC = 0.67) IR was observed. Without the parameters “missed throws” and “technical errors” in both rounds, the IR increased significantly (∅ICC: from 0.67 to 0.72 & ∅CV from 11.3 to 6.3 %). The heart rate was comparatively more reliable than lactate (∅ICC = 0.71 & ∅CV = 4.23 % vs. ∅ICC = 0.65 & ∅CV = 15.1 %). With respect to load parameters in round one, 50 % (5/10) showed a high IR; in round two, these values decreased to 40 % (4/10). The mean IR of the parameters in round one was higher than in round two (∅ICC = 0.71 & ∅CV = 12.2 % vs. ∅ICC = 0.60 & ∅CV = 14.3 %). Overall, there was an improvement of the athletes in most stress and load parameters from session one to session two.

Conclusions: The HBKT can be attested with a sufficient intraobserver reliability. When the parameters “missed throws” and “technical errors” were excluded, the IR further increased significantly. Therefore, these parameters should be recorded in order to standardized the HBKT, but not be included in the statistical analysis. There are discrete adaptation and learning effects. For this reason, it is essential to familiarise trainers and players with the HBKT test procedure before the first measurement. Otherwise training effects can be easily overrated. Moreover, the test concept of HBKT can be used as a blueprint for the development of sport-specific tests in other team sports (e. g., soccer, basketball). For example, we generated a complex soccer-specific field test [1] based on the HBKT.

Schlüsselwörter

Handball - Reliabilität - Leistungsdiagnostik - Komplextest

Key words

handball - reliability - assessment of physical performance - complex test performance
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Schwesig R, Hartmann M, Leuchte S et al. Validity of complex soccer-specific field test and a non-specific sprint test – Assessments for test and match performance. Sportverl Sportschad 2013; 27: 75-84
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Schwesig R, Fieseler G, Jungermann P et al. Longitudinal and specific analyses of physical performance in handball. Sportverl Sportschad 2012; 26: 151-158
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Granados C, Izquierdo M, Ibanez J et al. Are there any differences in physical fitness and throwing velocity between national and international elite female handball players?. J Strength Cond Res 2013; 27: 723-732
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Krüger K, Pilat C, Ueckert K et al. Physical performance profile of handball players is related to playing position and playing class. J Strength Cond Res 2014; 28: 117-125
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Manchado C, Tortosa-Martinez J, Vila H et al. Performance factors in women’s team handball: physical and physiological aspects – a review. J Strength Cond Res 2013; 27: 1708-1719
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Massuca LM, Fragoso I, Teles J. Attributes of top elite team-handball players. J Strength Cond Res 2014; 28: 178-186
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Matthys SP, Fransen J, Vaeyens R et al. Differences in biological maturation, anthropometry and physical performance between playing positions in youth team handball. J Sports Sci 2013; 31: 1344-1352
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Vieira F, Veiga V, Carita AI et al. Morphological and physical fitness characteristics of under-16 Portuguese male handball players with different levels of practice. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2013; 53: 169-176
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Beekhuizen KS, David MD, Kolber MJ et al. Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change of the hexagon agility test. J Strength Cond Res 2009; 23: 2167-2171
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Buchheit M, Spencer M, Ahmaidi S. Reliability, usefulness, and validity of a repeated sprint and jump ability test. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2010; 5: 3-17
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Haj-Sassi R, Dardouri W, Gharbi Z et al. Reliability and validity of a new repeated agility test as a measure of anaerobic and explosive power. J Strength Cond Res 2011; 25: 472-480
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Vicente-Rodriguez G, Rey-Lopez JP, Ruiz JR et al. Interrater reliability and time measurement validity of speed-agility field tests in adolescents. J Strength Cond Res 2011; 25: 2059-2063
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Castagna C, Manzi V, Impellizzeri F et al. Validity of an on-court lactate threshold test in young basketball players. J Strength Cond Res 2010; 24: 2434-2439
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Souhail H, Castagna C, Mohamed Hy et al. Direct validity of the Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test in young team handball players. J Strength Cond Res 2010; 24: 465-470
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Sporis G, Vucetic V, Jovanovic M et al. Reliability and factorial validity of flexibility tests for team sports. J Strength Cond Res 2011; 25: 1168-1176
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Bradley T, Baldwick C, Fischer D et al. Effect of taping on the shoulders of Australian football players. Br J Sports Med 2009; 43: 735-738
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Sekulic D, Spasic M, Mirkov D et al. Gender-specific influences of balance, speed, and power on agility performance. J Strength Cond Res 2013; 27: 802-811
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Schwesig R, Weirauch H, Eder P et al. Diagnostic Tools for Endurance Testing in Handball Players. Sportverl Sportschad 2010; 24: 46-51
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Bonett DG. Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision. Statistics in Medicine 2002; 21: 1331-1335
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 86: 420-428
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Hopkins W. Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Med 2000; 30: 1-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Hopker J, Myers S, Jobson SA et al. Validity and reliability of the Wattbike cycle ergometer. Int J Sports Med 2010; 31: 731-736
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Wragg CB, Maxwell NS, Doust JH. Evaluation of the reliability and validity of a soccer-specific field test of repeated sprint ability. Eur J Appl Physiol 2000; 83: 77-83
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Spencer M, Fitzsimons M, Dawson B et al. Reliability of a repeated-sprint test for field-hockey. J Sci Med Sport 2006; 9: 181-184
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Cormack SJ, Newton RU, McGuigan MR et al. Reliability of measures obtained during single and repeated countermovement jumps. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2008; 3: 131-144
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Impellizzeri FM, Rampinini E, Castagna C et al. Validity of a Repeated-Sprint Test for Football. Int J Sports Med 2008; 29: 899-905
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet 1986; 8: 307-310
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Chelly MS, Hermassi S, Aouadi R et al. Match analysis of elite adolescent team handball players. J Strength Cond Res 2011; 25: 2410-2417
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Póvoas SCA, Seabra AFT, Ascensão AAMR et al. Physical and physiological demands of elite team handball. J Strength Cond Res 2012; 26: 3365-3375
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Krustrup P, Mohr M, Amstrup T et al. The Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test: physiological response, reliability, and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35: 697-705
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Spencer M, Bishop D, Dawson B et al. Physiological and metabolic responses of repeated-sprint activities:specific to field-based team sports. Sports Med 2005; 35: 1025-1044
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Sheppard JM, Gabbett T, Taylor KL et al. Development of a Repeated-Effort Test for Elite Men’s Volleyball. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2007; 2: 292-304
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Wilhelmsen K, Strand LI, Nordahl SHG et al. Psychometric properties of the Vertigo symptom scale – Short form. BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders 2008; 8: 2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Schwesig R, Becker S, Fischer D. Intraobserver reliability of posturography in healthy subjects. Somatosens Mot Res 2014; 31: 16-22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Schwesig R, Fischer D, Becker S et al. Intraobserver reliability of posturography in patients with vestibular neuritis. Somatosens Mot Res 2014; 31: 28-34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar