Age-Related Changes in Cervical Sagittal Range of Motion and Alignment
14 February 2014
25 April 2014
09 June 2014 (eFirst)
Study Design Retrospective cohort study.
Objective To compare sagittal cervical range of motion (ROM) and alignment in young versus middle-aged adults.
Methods One hundred four asymptomatic adults were selected randomly out of 791 subjects who underwent lateral cervical radiographs in neutral, flexion, and extension positions. They were divided into two groups: young (age 20 to 29, 52 people) and middle-aged adults (age 50 to 59, 52 people). We determined the ROMs of upper cervical (occipital–C2 angle), midcervical (C2–C7 angle), and cervicothoracic spine (cervicosternal angle). We compared the alignment differences of the two groups by calculating the distances between C2 and C7 plumb lines, and C2 central-offset distance.
Results In neutral position, there was no significant difference between young and middle-aged adults. However, in flexion, C2–C7 angle, distance between C2–C7 plumb lines, and C2 central-offset distance decreased with age. In extension, C2–C7 angle and C2 central-offset distance decreased with age. During flexion and extension, midcervical ROM and the range of C2 central-offset distance decreased in the middle-aged group. However, there was no difference between the two age groups in the ROM of the upper cervical and the cervicothoracic regions during flexion and extension.
Conclusion We found that, despite of the presence of age-related cervical alignment changes, the only difference between the two groups was in the sagittal ROM of the midcervical spine during flexion and extension. Only the ROM of the midcervical spine appears to change significantly, consistent with findings that these levels are most likely to develop both symptomatic and asymptomatic degenerative changes.
- 1 Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Serrao G, Grassi G, Mossi E. Active range of motion of the head and cervical spine: a three-dimensional investigation in healthy young adults. J Orthop Res 2002; 20 (1) 122-129
- 2 Sforza C, Grassi G, Fragnito N, Turci M, Ferrario V. Three-dimensional analysis of active head and cervical spine range of motion: effect of age in healthy male subjects. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2002; 17 (8) 611-614
- 3 Tommasi DG, Foppiani AC, Galante D, Lovecchio N, Sforza C. Active head and cervical range of motion: effect of age in healthy females. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34 (18) 1910-1916
- 4 Malmström EM, Karlberg M, Fransson PA, Melander A, Magnusson M. Primary and coupled cervical movements: the effect of age, gender, and body mass index. A 3-dimensional movement analysis of a population without symptoms of neck disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006; 31 (2) E44-E50
- 5 Castro WH, Sautmann A, Schilgen M, Sautmann M. Noninvasive three-dimensional analysis of cervical spine motion in normal subjects in relation to age and sex. An experimental examination. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000; 25 (4) 443-449
- 6 Chen J, Solinger AB, Poncet JF, Lantz CA. Meta-analysis of normative cervical motion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999; 24 (15) 1571-1578
- 7 Yukawa Y, Kato F, Suda K, Yamagata M, Ueta T. Age-related changes in osseous anatomy, alignment, and range of motion of the cervical spine. Part I: radiographic data from over 1,200 asymptomatic subjects. Eur Spine J 2012; 21 (8) 1492-1498
- 8 Simpson AK, Biswas D, Emerson JW, Lawrence BD, Grauer JN. Quantifying the effects of age, gender, degeneration, and adjacent level degeneration on cervical spine range of motion using multivariate analyses. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008; 33 (2) 183-186
- 9 Sherekar SK, Yadav YR, Basoor AS, Baghel A, Adam N. Clinical implications of alignment of upper and lower cervical spine. Neurol India 2006; 54 (3) 264-267
- 10 Nojiri K, Matsumoto M, Chiba K , et al. Relationship between alignment of upper and lower cervical spine in asymptomatic individuals. J Neurosurg 2003; 99 (1, Suppl): 80-83
- 11 Matsunaga S, Onishi T, Sakou T. Significance of occipitoaxial angle in subaxial lesion after occipitocervical fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001; 26 (2) 161-165
- 12 Knott PT, Mardjetko SM, Techy F. The use of the T1 sagittal angle in predicting overall sagittal balance of the spine. Spine J 2010; 10 (11) 994-998
- 13 Kuntz IV C, Levin LS, Ondra SL, Shaffrey CI, Morgan CJ. Neutral upright sagittal spinal alignment from the occiput to the pelvis in asymptomatic adults: a review and resynthesis of the literature. J Neurosurg Spine 2007; 6 (2) 104-112
- 14 Vedantam R, Lenke LG, Keeney JA, Bridwell KH. Comparison of standing sagittal spinal alignment in asymptomatic adolescents and adults. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998; 23 (2) 211-215
- 15 Park MS, Moon SH, Lee HM , et al. The effect of age on cervical sagittal alignment: normative data on 100 asymptomatic subjects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013; 38 (8) E458-E463