Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 63(07): 583-588
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1383813
Original Thoracic
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Central Lung Cancer Management: Impact of Bronchial Resection Margin Length

Dohun Kim
1   Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea
,
Hong Kwan Kim
2   Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
,
Yong Soo Choi
2   Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
,
Kwhanmien Kim
3   Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Bundang, Republic of Korea
,
Jhingook Kim
2   Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
,
Young Mog Shim
2   Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

16 January 2014

28 April 2014

Publication Date:
17 July 2014 (online)

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical impact of bronchial resection margin length in centrally located, non-small cell lung cancer.

Materials and Methods A total of 1,854 pulmonary resections were performed between January 1994 and December 2005. Central lung cancer was defined as a tumor that was confirmed by bronchoscopy or a malignancy proven by bronchoscopic washing. Cases with neoadjuvant treatment that could alter the malignancy on the margin and those without documentation of margin length were excluded. To divide the study group into two groups, the cutoff value for the margin length was calculated by the minimum p-value approach. Clinical variables were then compared between the two groups and prognostic factors for survival were analyzed.

Results A total of 573 patients were included. The patients were divided into two groups based on margin length, short (< 19 mm) and long (≥ 19 mm). Overall survival and disease-free survival were superior in the short length group by univariate analysis (p = 0.03, 0.02). With multivariate analysis, advanced age (p < 0.00, 0.00), pneumonectomy (p < 0.00, 0.00), advanced pathologic stage (p < 0.00, 0.00), and no adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.00, 0.01) were poor prognostic factors for survival; however, bronchial resection margin length was not a statistically significant factor (p = 0.90, 0.96).

Conclusion A long bronchial resection margin length may not guarantee better oncologic outcomes in central lung cancer patients. Rather, avoiding pneumonectomy and the application of adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered to survival.

 
  • References

  • 1 Kara M, Sak SD, Orhan D, Yavuzer S. Changing patterns of lung cancer; (3/4 in.) 1.9 cm; still a safe length for bronchial resection margin?. Lung Cancer 2000; 30 (3) 161-168
  • 2 Tomaszek SC, Kim Y, Cassivi SD , et al. Bronchial resection margin length and clinical outcome in non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011; 40 (5) 1151-1156
  • 3 Berthet JP, Paradela M, Jimenez MJ, Molins L, Gómez-Caro A. Extended sleeve lobectomy: one more step toward avoiding pneumonectomy in centrally located lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2013; 96 (6) 1988-1997
  • 4 Wind J, Smit EJ, Senan S, Eerenberg JP. Residual disease at the bronchial stump after curative resection for lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007; 32 (1) 29-34
  • 5 Rineer J, Schreiber D, Katsoulakis E , et al. Survival following sublobar resection for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer with or without adjuvant external beam radiation therapy: a population-based study. Chest 2010; 137 (2) 362-368
  • 6 Lequaglie C, Conti B, Brega Massone PP, Giudice G. Unsuspected residual disease at the resection margin after surgery for lung cancer: fate of patients after long-term follow-up. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003; 23 (2) 229-232
  • 7 Brent A, Williams M, Jayawant N , et al. Finding Optimal Cutpoints for Continuous Covariates with Binary and Time-to-Event Outcomes. Mayo Foundation Technical Report Series, no. 79. Rochester, MN: Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic; 2006. ; Available at: http://ndc.mayo.edu/mayo/research/biostat/upload/79.pdf
  • 8 Altman DG, Lausen B, Sauerbrei W, Schumacher M. Dangers of using “optimal” cutpoints in the evaluation of prognostic factors. J Natl Cancer Inst 1994; 86 (11) 829-835
  • 9 Whitson BA, Groth SS, Andrade RS, Maddaus MA, Habermann EB, D'Cunha J. Survival after lobectomy versus segmentectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a population-based analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 92 (6) 1943-1950
  • 10 Ginsberg RJ, Rubinstein LV ; Lung Cancer Study Group. Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 60 (3) 615-622 , discussion 622–623
  • 11 Kelsey CR, Marks LB, Hollis D , et al. Local recurrence after surgery for early stage lung cancer: an 11-year experience with 975 patients. Cancer 2009; 115 (22) 5218-5227
  • 12 Kozower BD, Sheng S, O'Brien SM , et al. STS database risk models: predictors of mortality and major morbidity for lung cancer resection. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 90 (3) 875-881 , discussion 881–883
  • 13 Shi W, Zhang W, Sun H, Shao Y. Sleeve lobectomy versus pneumonectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2012; 10: 265
  • 14 Arriagada R, Auperin A, Burdett S , et al; NSCLC Meta-analyses Collaborative Group. Adjuvant chemotherapy, with or without postoperative radiotherapy, in operable non-small-cell lung cancer: two meta-analyses of individual patient data. Lancet 2010; 375 (9722) 1267-1277
  • 15 Pisters KM, Evans WK, Azzoli CG , et al; Cancer Care Ontario; American Society of Clinical Oncology. Cancer Care Ontario and American Society of Clinical Oncology adjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant radiation therapy for stages I-IIIA resectable non small-cell lung cancer guideline. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25 (34) 5506-5518