Laryngorhinootologie 2015; 94(02): 97-101
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1384552
Originalie
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Der supraclaviculäre Lappen zur Rekonstruktion im Kopf-Hals-Bereich

The Supraclavicular Flap for Reconstruction of the Head and Neck
M. Reiter
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
,
C. S. Betz
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
,
U. Harréus
2   Klinik für HNO-Heilkunde und Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf
,
P. Baumeister
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

eingereicht 21 April 2014

akzeptiert 24 June 2014

Publication Date:
06 August 2014 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Die komplexe Anatomie im Kopf-Hals-Bereich erfordert vom rekonstruktiv tätigen Operateur ein weites Spektrum verschiedener Lappen und Transplantate, um eine optimale Rekonstruktion für unterschiedliche Defekte gewährleisten zu können. Ein weitgehend in Vergessenheit geratener Lappen ist dabei der supraclaviculäre (Insel-)Lappen, der sich aufgrund seines weiten Rotationsradius und seiner verlässlichen Hautinsel bei gleichzeitig minimaler Morbidität der Spenderregion ideal zur Rekonstruktion auch größerer Defekte im Kopf-Hals-Bereich einsetzen lässt.

Abstract

The complex anatomy of the head and neck region requires the ability to raise a wide spectrum of pedicled and free flaps, to ensure optimal reconstruction of various defects by the reconstructive surgeon. The supraclavicular (island) flap, which has almost been buried in oblivion, provides excellent potential to reconstruct even bigger defects of the head and neck region, while causing minimal donor site morbidity at the same time. Its benefits lie in the reliable skin island and its wide arc of rotation, resulting in excellent cosmetic and functional outcomes.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Schneider D, Wu V, Wax M. Indications for pedicled pectoralis major flap in a free tissue transfer practice. Head Neck 2012; 34: 1106-1110
  • 2 Smeele L, Goldstein D, Tsai V, Gullane P, Neligan P, Brown D, Irish JC. Morbidity and cost differences between free flap reconstruction and pedicled flap reconstruction in oral and oropharyngeal cancer: Matched control study. J Otolaryngol 2006; 35: 102-107
  • 3 Ariyan S. The pectoralis major myocutaneous flap. A versatile flap for reconstruction in the head and neck. Plast Reconstr Surg 1979; 63: 73-81
  • 4 Baek S, Biller H, Krespi Y, Lawson W. The lower trapezius island myocutaneous flap. Ann Plast Surg 1980; 5: 108-114
  • 5 Bakamjian V. A two-stage method for pharyngoesophageal reconstruction with a primary pectoral skin flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1965; 36: 173-184
  • 6 Espitalier F, Ferron C, Leux C, Jegoux F, Durand N, Beauvillain De Montreuil C, Malard O. Results after U-shaped pectoralis major myocutaneous flap reconstruction of circumferential pharyngeal defects. Laryngoscope 2012; 122: 2677-2682
  • 7 Chiu E, Liu P, Friedlander P. Supraclavicular artery island flap for head and neck oncologic reconstruction: indications, complications, and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124: 115-123
  • 8 Shah J, Haribhakti V, Loree T, Sutaria P. Complications of the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap in head and neck reconstruction. Am J Surg 1990; 160: 352-355
  • 9 Anand A, Tran E, Hasney C, Friedlander P, Chiu E. Oropharyngeal reconstruction using the supraclavicular artery island flap: a new flap alternative. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129: 438-441
  • 10 Coleman JR. Reconstruction of the pharynx after resection for cancer. A comparison of methods. Ann Surg 1989; 209: 554-560 discussion 561
  • 11 Ross R, Baillieu C, Shayan R, Leung M, Ashton M. The anatomical basis for improving the reliability of the supraclavicular flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014; 67: 198-204
  • 12 Alves H, Ishida L, Ishida L, Besteiro J, Gemperli R, Faria J, Ferreira MC. A clinical experience of the supraclavicular flap used to reconstruct head and neck defects in late-stage cancer patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65: 1350-1356
  • 13 Mutter T. Case of Deformed Leg, from Unsuccessfully Treated Fracture: Cured by Operation. Prov Med J Retrosp Med Sci 1842; 4: 285-287
  • 14 Kazanjian VH, Converse JM. The surgical treatment of facial injuries. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1959
  • 15 Lamberty B. The supra-clavicular axial patterned flap. Br J Plast Surg 1979; 32: 207-212
  • 16 Mathes S, Vasconez L. The cervicohumeral flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978; 61: 7-12
  • 17 Pallua N, Machens H, Rennekampff O, Becker M, Berger A. The fasciocutaneous supraclavicular artery island flap for releasing postburn mentosternal contractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99: 1878-1884 discussion 1885-1886
  • 18 Pallua N, Magnus Noah E. The tunneled supraclavicular island flap: an optimized technique for head and neck reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105: 842-851 discussion 852-854
  • 19 Liu P, Chiu E. Supraclavicular artery flap: a new option for pharyngeal reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 62: 497-501