PDF herunterladen
Gefäßmedizin Scan - Zeitschrift für Angiologie, Gefäßchirurgie, diagnostische und interventionelle Radiologie 2014; 01(02): 153-165
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1391223
Fortbildung
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Endoleckagen nach endovaskulärer Ausschaltung von infrarenalen Bauchaortenaneurysmen

Nikolaos Tsilimparis
,
Eike Sebastian Debus
,
Sabine Wipper
,
Ralph-Ingo Rückert
,
Holger Diener
,
Axel Larena-Avellaneda
,
Tilo Kölbel
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
17. Dezember 2014 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints
Fazit

Mit Zunahme der endovaskulären Aortenchirurgie werden Gefäßmediziner in Zukunft immer häufiger mit Endoleckagen und Versagen der primären endovaskulären Therapie konfrontiert werden. Während Typ-I- und Typ-III-Endoleckagen unmittelbar versorgungspflichtig sind, muss man bei Typ-II-Endoleckagen eine differenzierte Strategie anwenden.

Bei der Vielfalt von Therapieoptionen, die heute zur Verfügung stehen, ist es für die behandelnden Ärzte von essenzieller Bedeutung, einen eigenen, evidenzbasierten Behandlungsalgorithmus zu entwickeln, der die Besonderheiten und Möglichkeiten der eigenen Einrichtung berücksichtigt.

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Antoniou GA, Georgiadis GS, Antoniou SA et al. A meta-analysis of outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with hostile and friendly neck anatomy. J Vasc Surg 2013; 57: 527-538
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bisdas T, Weiss K, Donas KP et al. Use of iliac branch devices for endovascular repair of aneurysmal distal seal zones after EVAR. J Endovasc Ther 2014; 21: 579-586
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Choi SY, Lee doY, Lee KH et al. Treatment of type I endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm: usefulness of N-butyl cyanoacrylate embolization in cases of failed secondary endovascular intervention. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2011; 22: 155-162
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Coppi G, Saitta G, Coppi G et al. Transealing: a novel and simple technique for embolization of type 2 endoleaks through direct sac access from the distal stent-graft landing zone. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2014; 47: 394-401
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Dayama A, Tsilimparis N, Kasirajan K et al. Late Gore Excluder endoprosthesis fabric tear leading to abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture 5 years after initial implant. J Vasc Surg 2013; 57: 221-224
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Donas KP, Pecoraro F, Torsello G et al. Use of covered chimney stents for pararenal aortic pathologies is safe and feasible with excellent patency and low incidence of endoleaks. J Vasc Surg 2012; 55: 659-665
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Gandini R, Chiocchi M, Loreni G et al. Treatment of type II endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair: The role of selective vs. nonselective transcaval embolization. J Endovasc Ther 2014; 21: 714-722
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Giles KA, Landon BE, Cotterill P et al. Thirty-day mortality and late survival with reinterventions and readmissions after open and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in Medicare beneficiaries. J Vasc Surg 2011; 53: 6-12, 3 e1
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Habets J, Zandvoort HJ, Reitsma JB et al. Magnetic resonance imaging is more sensitive than computed tomography angiography for the detection of endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2013; 45: 340-350
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Jordan WD Jr. Mehta M, Varnagy D et al. Results of the ANCHOR prospective, multicenter registry of EndoAnchors for type Ia endoleaks and endograft migration in patients with challenging anatomy. . J Vasc Surg 2014; 60: 885-892, e2
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Karthikesalingam A, Al-Jundi W, Jackson D et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of duplex ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography or computed tomography for surveillance after endovascular aneurysm repair. Br J Surg 2012; 99: 1514-1523
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Khaja MS, Park AW, Swee W et al. Treatment of type II endoleak using Onyx with long-term imaging follow-up. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2014; 37: 613-622
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kim JK, Noll RE Jr. Tonnessen BH et al. A technique for increased accuracy in the placement of the "giant" Palmaz stent for treatment of type IA endoleak after endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair. . J Vasc Surg 2008; 48: 755-757
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Krievins DK, Holden A, Savlovskis J et al. EVAR using the Nellix Sac-anchoring endoprosthesis: treatment of favourable and adverse anatomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011; 42: 38-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Lazarides MK, Georgiadis GS, Charalampidis DG et al. Impact of long-term warfarin treatment on EVAR durability: a meta-analysis. J Endovasc Ther 2014; 21: 148-153
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Martin Z, Greenberg RK, Mastracci TM et al. Late rescue of proximal endograft failure using fenestrated and branched devices. J Vasc Surg 2014; 59: 1479-1487
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17 May J, White GH, Yu W et al. Endoluminal grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysms: causes of failure and their prevention. J Endovasc Surg 1994; 1: 44-52
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Nabi D, Murphy EH, Pak J et al. Open surgical repair after failed endovascular aneurysm repair: is endograft removal necessary?. J Vasc Surg 2009; 50: 714-721
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Nevala T, Biancari F, Manninen H et al. Inferior mesenteric artery embolization before endovascular repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm: effect on type II endoleak and aneurysm shrinkage. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010; 21: 181-185
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Piazza M, Frigatti P, Scrivere P et al. Role of aneurysm sac embolization during endovascular aneurysm repair in the prevention of type II endoleak-related complications. J Vasc Surg 2013; 57: 934-941
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Rajani RR, Arthurs ZM, Srivastava SD et al. Repairing immediate proximal endoleaks during abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2011; 53: 1174-1177
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Scali ST, Feezor RJ, Chang CK et al. Critical analysis of results after chimney endovascular aortic aneurysm repair raises cause for concern. J Vasc Surg 2014; 60: 865-874, e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Scali ST, McNally MM, Feezor RJ et al. Elective endovascular aortic repair conversion for type Ia endoleak is not associated with increased morbidity or mortality compared with primary juxtarenal aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2014; 60: 286-294, e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Schanzer A, Greenberg RK, Hevelone N et al. Predictors of abdominal aortic aneurysm sac enlargement after endovascular repair. Circulation 2011; 123: 2848-2855
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Sidloff DA, Stather PW, Choke E et al. Type II endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair. Br J Surg 2013; 100: 1262-1270
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Tsilimparis N, Dayama A, Ricotta JJ 2nd. Remodeling of aortic aneurysm and aortic neck on mid- and long-term follow-up after endovascular repair with suprarenal fixation. J Vasc Surg 2014; [Epub ahead of print] pii: S0741-5214(14)01272-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.06.104.
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Uthoff H, Katzen BT, Gandhi R et al. Direct percutaneous sac injection for postoperative endoleak treatment after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2012; 56: 965-972
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar