Predictability of Morphological Changes of the Anterior Chamber Angle after Laser Iridotomy by Ultrasound Biomicroscopy

C. Nützi; S. Orgül; A. Schötzau; M. C. Grieshaber

doi:10.1055/s-0035-1545793

Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde, Table of Contents

Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2015; 232(4): 419-426
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1545793

Klinische Studie

Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Predictability of Morphological Changes of the Anterior Chamber Angle after Laser Iridotomy by Ultrasound Biomicroscopy

Vorhersagbarkeit von strukturellen Veränderungen des Kammerwinkels nach Iridotomie mittels Ultraschallbiomikroskopie

Authors

C. Nützi

Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Basel, Switzerland (Chairman ad interim: Dr. sc. nat. Norbert Spirig)
S. Orgül

Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Basel, Switzerland (Chairman ad interim: Dr. sc. nat. Norbert Spirig)
A. Schötzau

Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Basel, Switzerland (Chairman ad interim: Dr. sc. nat. Norbert Spirig)
M. C. Grieshaber

Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Basel, Switzerland (Chairman ad interim: Dr. sc. nat. Norbert Spirig)

Abstract

Background: Laser peripheral iridotomy is a useful method in primary angle-closure eyes to prevent angle-closure attack and development of glaucomatous optic nerve damage. The aim of this study was to quantify morphological changes after LPI and their impact on intraocular pressure, and to evaluate predictive parameters for enlarging the anterior chamber angle after laser peripheral iridotomy. Patients and Methods: Ultrasound biomicroscopy images and intraocular pressure before and after laser peripheral iridotomy from 62 eyes of 34 patients with primary angle-closure were retrospectively analysed. Anterior chamber angle, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, iris curvature and a newly defined parameter, the end-iris-lens vault were measured. Results: In each quadrant anterior chamber angle was on average significantly larger (at 12 oʼclock: from 10.1° to 15.0°; at 3 oʼclock: from 13.4° to 19.8°; at 6 oʼclock: from 12.2° to 18.5°; at 9 oʼclock: from 12.9 to 17.9°; p < 0.001) and iris curvature significantly smaller (at 12 oʼclock: from 0.26 mm to 0.10 mm; at 3 oʼclock: from 0.21 mm to 0.08 mm; at 6 oʼclock: from 0.25 mm to 0.08 mm; at 9 oʼclock: from 0.21 mm to 0.08 mm; p < 0.001) after laser peripheral iridotomy. Anterior chamber depth, lens thickness and end-iris-lens-vault did not significantly change. Anterior chamber angle in each quadrant (p < 0.05), and iris curvature at 3 and 6 oʼclock positions (p < 0.05) were highly predictive for the enlargement of the anterior chamber angle after laser peripheral iridotomy. Intraocular pressure was slightly lower after laser peripheral iridotomy (from 16.6 mmHg to 16.1 mmHg). Conclusion: In primary angle-closure eyes, laser peripheral iridotomy enlarges the angle and flattens the iris significantly. This study demonstrated that a small anterior chamber angle and a large iris curvature are predictive parameters for a greater enlargement of the anterior chamber angle after laser peripheral iridotomy. These new findings underline the importance of the ultrasound biomicroscopy and may help in counselling patients about laser peripheral iridotomy.

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund: Die periphere Laser Iridotomie ist eine nützliche Methode bei Augen mit primärem Engwinkel, um einen Winkelblock und einer glaukomatösen Optikusnervenschädigung vorzubeugen. Das Ziel dieser Studie war es, morphologische Veränderungen des Vorderabschnittsegments nach peripherer Laser-Iridotomie und ihren prädiktiven Einfluss sowie auf die Öffnung des Kammerwinkels und auf den Augeninnendruck zu beurteilen. Patienten und Methoden: Ultraschallbiomikroskopie Bilder und Augeninnendruck wurden vor und nach peripherer Laser-Iridotomie von 62 Augen von 34 Patienten mit primärem Engwinkel retrospektiv analysiert. Der Kammerwinkel, die Vorderkammertiefe, die Linsendicke, die Iriskurve sowie ein neuer Parameter, der End-Iris-Lens-Vault, wurden gemessen. Ergebnisse: In jedem Quadranten war der vordere Kammerwinkel signifikant größer (bei 12 Uhr: von 10,1° zu 15,0°; bei 3 Uhr: von 13,4° zu 19,8°; bei 6 Uhr: von 12,2° zu 18,5°; bei 9 Uhr: von 12,9 zu 17,9°; p < 0,001) und die Iriskurve war signifikant kleiner (bei 12 Uhr: von 0,26 mm zu 0,10 mm; bei 3 Uhr: von 0,21 mm zu 0,08 mm; bei 6 Uhr: von 0,25 mm zu 0,08 mm; bei 9 Uhr: von 0,21 mm zu 0,08 mm; p < 0,001) nach Laser Iridotomie. Die Vorderkammertiefe, die Linsendicke und der End-Iris-Lens-Vault hatten keine signifikante Veränderung. Der Kammerwinkel war signifikant prädiktiv in jedem Quadranten (p < 0,05), und die Iriskurve war signifikant prädiktiv an der 3-Uhr- und der 6-Uhr-Position (p < 0,05) für die Öffnung des vorderen Kammerwinkels nach peripherer Laser-Iridotomie. Der Augeninnendruck war geringfügig niedriger nach peripherer Laser-Iridotomie (von 16,6 mmHg zu 16,1 mmHg). Schlussfolgerungen: In Augen mit primärem Engwinkel öffnet sich der Winkel und verflacht sich die Iris nach peripherer Laser-Iridotomie signifikant. Diese Studie konnte aufzeigen, dass ein kleiner Kammerwinkel und eine große Iriskurve prädiktive Parameter für eine größere Kammerwinkelöffnung nach Laser-Iridotomie sind, und unterstreicht den Stellenwert der Ultraschallbiomikroskopie in der Beratung von Patienten über periphere Laser-Iridotomie.

Schlüsselwörter

periphere Laser Iridotomie (LPI) - Engwinkel - Ultraschall Biomikroskopie (UBM) - Kammerwinkel (ACA) - Iriskurve (IC)

Key words

laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) - angle-closure - ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) - anterior chamber angle (ACA) - iris curvature (IC)

Full Text

References

References
1 Quigley HA. Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol 1996; 80: 389-393
2 Cook C, Foster P. Epidemiology of glaucoma: whatʼs new?. Can J Ophthalmol 2012; 47: 223-226
3 Cedrone C, Mancino R, Cerulli A et al. Epidemiology of primary glaucoma: prevalence, incidence, and blinding effects. Prog Brain Res 2008; 173: 3-14
4 Yip JL, Foster PJ. Ethnic differences in primary angle-closure glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2006; 17: 175-180
5 Day AC, Baio G, Gazzard G et al. The prevalence of primary angle closure glaucoma in European derived populations: a systematic review. Br J Ophthalmol 2012; 96: 1162-1167
6 Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA et al. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol 2002; 86: 238-242
7 Tello C, Tran HV, Liebmann J et al. Angle closure: classification, concepts, and the role of ultrasound biomicroscopy in diagnosis and treatment. Semin Ophthalmol 2002; 17: 69-78
8 Tarongoy P, Ho CL, Walton DS. Angle-closure glaucoma: the role of the lens in the pathogenesis, prevention, and treatment. Surv Ophthalmol 2009; 54: 211-225
9 Gazzard G, Friedman DS, Devereux JG et al. A prospective ultrasound biomicroscopy evaluation of changes in anterior segment morphology after laser iridotomy in Asian eyes. Ophthalmology 2003; 110: 630-638
10 Nolan WP, Foster PJ, Devereux JG et al. YAG laser iridotomy treatment for primary angle closure in east Asian eyes. Br J Ophthalmol 2000; 84: 1255-1259
11 Pavlin CJ, Foster FS. Ultrasound biomicroscopy in glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl 1992; 204: 7-9
12 Tello C, Liebmann J, Potash SD et al. Measurement of ultrasound biomicroscopy images: intraobserver and interobserver reliability. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994; 35: 3549-3552
13 Dorairaj S, Oliveira C, Fose AK et al. Accommodation-induced changes in iris curvature. Exp Eye Res 2008; 86: 220-225
14 R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2014. Available online: http://www.R-project.org/ (accessed 03/2015)
15 Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D. R Core Team. _nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models_. R package version 3.1–118 (2014). Available online:. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme (accessed 03/2015)
16 Wickham H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer; 2009
17 Marraffa M, Marchini G, Pagliarusco A et al. Ultrasound biomicroscopy and corneal endothelium in Nd : YAG-laser iridotomy. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 1995; 26: 519-523
18 Mansouri K, Burgener ND, Bagnoud M et al. A prospective ultrasound biomicroscopy evaluation of changes in anterior segment morphology following laser iridotomy in European eyes. Eye (Lond) 2009; 23: 2046-2051
19 He M, Friedman DS, Ge J et al. Laser peripheral iridotomy in eyes with narrow drainage angles: ultrasound biomicroscopy outcomes. The Liwan Eye Study. Ophthalmology 2007; 114: 1513-1519
20 Ramani KK, Mani B, George RJ et al. Follow-up of primary angle closure suspects after laser peripheral iridotomy using ultrasound biomicroscopy and A-scan biometry for a period of 2 years. J Glaucoma 2009; 18: 521-527
21 Dada T, Mohan S, Sihota R et al. Comparison of ultrasound biomicroscopic parameters after laser iridotomy in eyes with primary angle closure and primary angle closure glaucoma. Eye (Lond) 2007; 21: 956-961
22 Cumba RJ, Nagi KS, Bell NP et al. Clinical outcomes of peripheral iridotomy in patients with the spectrum of chronic primary angle closure. ISRN Ophthalmol 2013; 2013: 828972