Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 63(06): 519-525
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1546427
Original Thoracic
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Comparison of Postoperative Pain after Different Thoracic Surgery Approaches as Measured by Electrical Stimulation

Norifumi Tsubokawa
1   Department of Respiratory Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Japan
,
Hiroaki Harada
1   Department of Respiratory Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Japan
,
Chie Takenaka
1   Department of Respiratory Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Japan
,
Keizo Misumi
1   Department of Respiratory Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Japan
,
Yoshinori Yamashita
1   Department of Respiratory Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

07 August 2014

10 December 2014

Publication Date:
13 March 2015 (online)

Abstract

Background Postoperative pain is commonly evaluated using the numerous rating scale (NRS), visual analogue scale, or pain scale; however, these assessments are easily affected by various subjective factors. We measured the degree of postoperative chest pain among different thoracic surgery approaches using NRS and electrical stimulation measurements.

Methods Seventy patients who underwent lobectomy or segmentectomy were enrolled. Concomitant with NRS, pain scores were quantitatively measured on postoperative day 2 using an electrical neurostimulator to compare the degree of pain among three different surgical approaches: pure video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), hybrid VATS, and conventional thoracotomy. The risk factors associated with postoperative pain were also analyzed.

Results Thirty patients underwent lung resection with pure VATS, while 30 had hybrid VATS, and 10 had conventional thoracotomy. Among the three surgical approaches, analyzing the pain score indicated statistically significant differences (pure, 159.50 ± 26.22; hybrid, 269.36 ± 30.49; thoracotomy, 589.40 ± 141.11; p = 0.003); however, NRS did not obtain a statistically significant difference between the three approaches (pure, 4.26 ± 0.27; hybrid, 4.96 ± 0.30; thoracotomy, 5.50 ± 0.68; p = 0.105). A multivariate analysis showed that the surgical approach was an independent risk factor for postoperative pain as determined by the pain score (pure vs. hybrid, p = 0.076; pure vs. thoracotomy, p < 0.001).

Conclusion For lung surgery, the differences in surgical approach were an independent risk factor for postoperative pain. In the early postoperative period, pure VATS was shown to be the least painful of the three surgical approaches.

 
  • References

  • 1 Yamashita Y, Mukaida H, Harada H, Tsubokawa N. Post-thoracotomy pain and long-term survival associated with video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy methods for clinical T1N0 lung cancer: a patient-oriented, prospective cohort study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013; 44 (1) e71-e76
  • 2 Miyazaki T, Sakai T, Tsuchiya T , et al. Assessment and follow-up of intercostal nerve damage after video-assisted thoracic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011; 39 (6) 1033-1039
  • 3 Masson EA, Boulton AJ. The Neurometer: validation and comparison with conventional tests for diabetic neuropathy. Diabet Med 1991; 8 (Spec No) S63-S66
  • 4 Sakai T, Tomiyasu S, Yamada H, Sumikawa K. Evaluation of allodynia and pain associated with postherpetic neuralgia using current perception threshold testing. Clin J Pain 2006; 22 (4) 359-362
  • 5 Wallace MS, Dyck JB, Rossi SS, Yaksh TL. Computer-controlled lidocaine infusion for the evaluation of neuropathic pain after peripheral nerve injury. Pain 1996; 66 (1) 69-77
  • 6 Yamashita T, Kanaya K, Sekine M, Takebayashi T, Kawaguchi S, Katahira G. A quantitative analysis of sensory function in lumbar radiculopathy using current perception threshold testing. Spine 2002; 27 (14) 1567-1570
  • 7 Sakai T, Aoki H, Hojo M, Takada M, Murata H, Sumikawa K. Adhesiolysis and targeted steroid/local anesthetic injection during epiduroscopy alleviates pain and reduces sensory nerve dysfunction in patients with chronic sciatica. J Anesth 2008; 22 (3) 242-247
  • 8 Shiraishi T, Shirakusa T, Iwasaki A, Hiratsuka M, Yamamoto S, Kawahara K. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) segmentectomy for small peripheral lung cancer tumors: intermediate results. Surg Endosc 2004; 18 (11) 1657-1662
  • 9 Okada M, Sakamoto T, Yuki T, Mimura T, Miyoshi K, Tsubota N. Hybrid surgical approach of video-assisted minithoracotomy for lung cancer: significance of direct visualization on quality of surgery. Chest 2005; 128 (4) 2696-2701
  • 10 Herr KA, Spratt K, Mobily PR, Richardson G. Pain intensity assessment in older adults: use of experimental pain to compare psychometric properties and usability of selected pain scales with younger adults. Clin J Pain 2004; 20 (4) 207-219
  • 11 Herr K, Spratt KF, Garand L, Li L. Evaluation of the Iowa pain thermometer and other selected pain intensity scales in younger and older adult cohorts using controlled clinical pain: a preliminary study. Pain Med 2007; 8 (7) 585-600
  • 12 Gagliese L, Weizblit N, Ellis W, Chan VW. The measurement of postoperative pain: a comparison of intensity scales in younger and older surgical patients. Pain 2005; 117 (3) 412-420
  • 13 Demmy TL, Nwogu C. Is video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy better? Quality of life considerations. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 85 (2) S719-S728
  • 14 Roviaro G, Varoli F, Vergani C, Maciocco M, Nucca O, Pagano C. Video-assisted thoracoscopic major pulmonary resections: technical aspects, personal series of 259 patients, and review of the literature. Surg Endosc 2004; 18 (11) 1551-1558
  • 15 Landreneau RJ, Mack MJ, Hazelrigg SR , et al. Prevalence of chronic pain after pulmonary resection by thoracotomy or video-assisted thoracic surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994; 107 (4) 1079-1085 , discussion 1085–1086
  • 16 Nomori H, Horio H, Naruke T, Suemasu K. What is the advantage of a thoracoscopic lobectomy over a limited thoracotomy procedure for lung cancer surgery?. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 72 (3) 879-884
  • 17 Sugiura H, Morikawa T, Kaji M, Sasamura Y, Kondo S, Katoh H. Long-term benefits for the quality of life after video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy in patients with lung cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 1999; 9 (6) 403-408
  • 18 Koop O, Gries A, Eckert S , et al. The role of intercostal nerve preservation in pain control after thoracotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013; 43 (4) 808-812
  • 19 Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Maniscalco LM. A nondivided intercostal muscle flap further reduces pain of thoracotomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 85 (6) 1901-1906 , discussion 1906–1907
  • 20 Rogers ML, Henderson L, Mahajan RP, Duffy JP. Preliminary findings in the neurophysiological assessment of intercostal nerve injury during thoracotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002; 21 (2) 298-301
  • 21 Swanson SJ, Herndon II JE, D'Amico TA , et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: report of CALGB 39802—a prospective, multi-institution feasibility study. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25 (31) 4993-4997
  • 22 Wildgaard K, Petersen RH, Hansen HJ, Møller-Sørensen H, Ringsted TK, Kehlet H. Multimodal analgesic treatment in video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy using an intraoperative intercostal catheter. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012; 41 (5) 1072-1077
  • 23 Gottschalk A, Cohen SP, Yang S, Ochroch EA. Preventing and treating pain after thoracic surgery. Anesthesiology 2006; 104 (3) 594-600
  • 24 Soto RG, Fu ES. Acute pain management for patients undergoing thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 75 (4) 1349-1357
  • 25 Ochroch EA, Gottschalk A. Impact of acute pain and its management for thoracic surgical patients. Thorac Surg Clin 2005; 15 (1) 105-121