Download PDF
Ultraschall Med 2017; 38(02): 166-173
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1553267
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Multimodal Ultrasonographic Pathway of Parotid Gland Lesions

Multimodaler sonografischer Diagnosepfad für Parotisläsionen
Naglaa Mansour
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Germany
,
Murat Bas
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Germany
,
Konrad Friedrich Stock
2   Department of Nephrology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Germany
,
Ulrich Strassen
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Germany
,
Benedikt Hofauer
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Germany
,
Andreas Knopf
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

17 June 2014

08 May 2015

Publication Date:
14 August 2015 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate a multimodal pathway in solitary circumscribed parotid gland lesions (PL) to predict tumor dignity and to avoid repeat surgery.

Materials and Methods 202 patients with PL underwent medical history, clinical examination, high-resolution B-mode ultrasound (US), real-time sonoelastography (RTE), color-coded duplex sonography (CDS), and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Malignancy was suspected when: 1. patients reported on previous cutaneous head and neck (H&N) malignancy; 2. patients presented synchronous cutaneous H&N malignancy and/or facial palsy; 3. US visualized poorly defined tumor borders and/or pathological cervical lymph nodes; 4. PL showed poor vascularization in CDS with enhanced perfusion kinetics in CEUS; 5. PL showed moderate/strong vascularization with delayed perfusion kinetics. Intraoperative frozen section was performed in PLs suspicious for malignancy, and surgery was extended when malignancy was confirmed. The sensitivity, specificity, negative, and positive predictive values (NPV/PPV) were calculated.

Results Histology revealed 170 benign and 32 malignant PLs. Medical history, clinical examination, and B-mode US identified malignancy with a sensitivity/specificity of 77 %/98 %. After application of CDS and CEUS in the multimodal pathway, the sensitivity of malignant tumors increased to 91 %. The decreased specificity (81 %) was equalized by intraoperative frozen section (PPV 48 %, NPV 98 %). After application of the multimodal pathway, only 1 patient underwent repeat surgery.

Conclusion The multimodal pathway is a useful method to predict dignity in PLs and reduces the number of repeat surgeries.

Zusammenfassung

Ziel Präoperative Bestimmung der Dignität umschriebener Parotisläsionen (PL) mittels eines multimodalen Diagnosepfads zur Vermeidung von Re-Operationen.

Material und Methoden Bei 202 Patienten mit PL wurde durchgeführt: eine Anamnese, eine klinische Untersuchung, eine Sonografie der Kopf-Halsregion (US), eine farbkodierte Duplexsonografie (FKDS), ein kontrastverstärktes Ultraschall (CEUS), eine Elastografie (RTE). Die PL war anhand des multimodalen Diagnosepfads malignomsuspekt bei: 1. positiver Vorgeschichte für maligne Hauttumore, 2. suspekten Hauttumoren und/oder einer Fazialisparese, 3. unscharfen Tumorgrenzen und/oder pathologischen Halslymphkoten im US, 4. moderater/starker Vaskularisation in der FKDS und verzögerter Perfusion in der CEUS, und/oder 5. schwacher Vaskularisation und rascher Perfusion der PL. Alle Patienten wurden operiert. Bei den präoperativ malignomsuspekten PL wurde intraoperativ ein Schnellschnitt durchgeführt. Bestätigte sich der Verdacht, wurde die OP erweitert. Für alle Entitäten wurden die Sensitivität, Spezifität, positiver und negativer Vorhersagewert (PPV/NPV) bestimmt.

Ergebnisse Histologisch ergaben sich 170 benigne und 32 maligne PL. Durch Anamnese, klinische Untersuchung und US ergab sich für Malignome eine Sensitivität/Spezifität von 77 %/98 %. Durch zusätzlichen Einsatz von FKDS und CEUS konnte für Malignome die Sensitivität auf 91 % gesteigert werden. Die reduzierte Spezifität (81 %) wurde durch den Schnellschnitt egalisiert (PPV/NPV 48 %/98 %). Durch den multimodalen Diagnosepfads musste nur 1 Patient nachoperiert werden.

Schlussfolgerung Der multimodale Diagnosepfad ist hilfreich, um präoperativ die Dignität von PL zu bestimmen und die Rate an Re-Operationen zu senken.

Key words

salivary glands - ultrasound - elastography - color-coded duplex sonography - contrast-enhanced ultrasound
 

  • References

  • 1 Seifert G. et al. WHO International Histological Classification of Tumours. Tentative Histological Classification of Salivary Gland Tumours. Pathology, research and practice 1990; 186: 555-581
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Koch M. Zenk J. Iro H. Long-term results of morbidity after parotid gland surgery in benign disease. Laryngoscope 2010; 120: 724-730
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Spiro JD. Spiro RH. Cancer of the parotid gland: role of 7th nerve preservation. World journal of surgery 2003; 27: 863-867
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Head and Neck Cancers. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, Version 2 2013
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Lee YY. et al. Imaging of salivary gland tumours. Eur J Radiol 2008; 66: 419-436
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Gritzmann N. Sonography of the salivary glands. Am J Roentgenol 1989; 153: 161-166
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Adamietz BR. et al. New diagnostic criteria in real-time elastography for the assessment of breast lesions. Ultraschall in Med 2011; 32: 67-73
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Rubaltelli L. et al. Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules at elastosonography. Ultraschall in Med 2009; 30: 175-179
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Wojcinski S. et al. Multicenter study of ultrasound real-time tissue elastography in 779 cases for the assessment of breast lesions: improved diagnostic performance by combining the BI-RADS(R)-US classification system with sonoelastography. Ultraschall in Med 2010; 31: 484-491
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Itoh A. et al. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 2006; 239: 341-350
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Knopf A. et al. Multimodal ultrasonographic characterisation of parotid gland lesions--a pilot study. European journal of radiology 2012; 81: 3300-3305
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Klotz LV. et al. Perfusion characteristics of parotid gland tumors evaluated by contrast-enhanced ultrasound. European journal of radiology 2013; 82: 2227-2232
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Gou JM. et al. Quantitative diagnosis of salivary gland tumors with contrast-enhanced ultrasound-a preliminary study. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology 2013; 116: 784-790
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Wei X. et al. Evaluation of microvascularization in focal salivary gland lesions by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) and Color Doppler sonography. Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation 2013; 54: 259-271
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Fischer T. et al. Differentiation of parotid gland tumors with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. RoFo: Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin 2010; 182: 155-162
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Mansour N. et al. Evaluation of parotid gland lesions with standard ultrasound, color duplex sonography, sonoelastography, and acoustic radiation force impulse imaging – a pilot study. Ultraschall in der Medizin 2012; 33: 283-288
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Dumitriu D. et al. Ultrasonographic and sonoelastographic features of pleomorphic adenomas of the salivary glands. Med Ultrason 2010; 12: 175-183
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Pinkston JA. Cole P. Incidence rates of salivary gland tumors: results from a population-based study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999; 120: 834-840
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Drivas EI. et al. Pattern of parotid gland tumors on Crete, Greece: a retrospective study of 131 cases. Medical science monitor: international medical journal of experimental and clinical research 2007; 13: CR136-CR140
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Brennan PA. et al. Is ultrasound alone sufficient for imaging superficial lobe benign parotid tumours before surgery?. The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery 2012; 50: 333-337
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Bialek EJ. et al. US of the major salivary glands: anatomy and spatial relationships, pathologic conditions, and pitfalls. Radiographics: a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc 2006; 26: 745-763
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Bhatia KS. et al. Evaluation of real-time qualitative sonoelastography of focal lesions in the parotid and submandibular glands: applications and limitations. Eur Radiol 2010; 20: 1958-1964
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Bozzato A. et al. Potential of ultrasound diagnosis for parotid tumors: analysis of qualitative and quantitative parameters. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007; 137: 642-646
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Gallipoli A. et al. Ultrasound contrast media in the study of salivary gland tumors. Anticancer research 2005; 25: 2477-2482
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Celebi I. Mahmutoglu AS. Early results of real-time qualitative sonoelastography in the evaluation of parotid gland masses: a study with histopathological correlation. Acta radiologica 2013; 54: 35-41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Dumitriu D. et al. Real-time sonoelastography of major salivary gland tumors. Am J Roentgenol. American journal of roentgenology 2011; 197: W924-W930
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Badea AF. et al. Solid parotid tumors: an individual and integrative analysis of various ultrasonographic criteria. A prospective and observational study. Medical ultrasonography 2013; 15: 289-298
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Lim LH. et al. Parotid gland surgery: 4-year review of 118 cases in an Asian population. Head & neck 2003; 25: 543-548
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Bartels S. et al. The relative value of fine-needle aspiration and imaging in the preoperative evaluation of parotid masses. Head & neck 2000; 22: 781-786
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Stewart CJ. et al. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of salivary gland: a review of 341 cases. Diagnostic cytopathology 2000; 22: 139-146
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar