Int J Sports Med 2016; 37(05): 382-387
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1565140
Orthopedics & Biomechanics
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

An Acute Bout of Barefoot Running Alters Lower-limb Muscle Activation for Minimalist Shoe Users

N. J. Snow
1   Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
,
F. A. Basset
2   Memorial University of Newfoundland, School of Human Kinetics and Recreation, St. John’s, Canada
,
J. Byrne
2   Memorial University of Newfoundland, School of Human Kinetics and Recreation, St. John’s, Canada
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History



accepted after revision 07 October 2015

Publication Date:
02 February 2016 (online)

Abstract

Despite the abundance of barefoot running-related research, there have been no electromyography studies evaluating the effects of this mode of exercise on habitual users of minimalist footwear. The present study investigated differences in muscle activation during acute bouts of barefoot and shod running, in minimalist shoe users. 8 male participants ran on a motorized treadmill for 10 min under both conditions, at 70% maximal aerobic speed. Electromyographic data were sampled from the biceps femoris, gluteus maximus, gastrocnemius medialis, tibialis anterior, and vastus lateralis during both swing and stance. Root-mean-square analysis of electromyographic data was conducted to compare muscle activation between conditions. During stance, barefoot running resulted in greater muscle activity in gastrocnemius medialis and gluteus maximus, and lower muscle activity in tibialis anterior. During swing, barefoot running resulted in increased muscle activity in vastus lateralis and gastrocnemius medialus. These results indicate that, for minimalist shoe users, an acute bout of barefoot running results in significantly different lower-limb muscle activity. Increased activation in the above muscles presents a possible mechanism for injury, which should be considered during exercise prescription.

 
  • References

  • 1 American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) . ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 9th ed. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2013
  • 2 Almonroeder T, Willson JD, Kernozek TW. The effect of foot strike pattern on Achilles tendon load during running. Ann Biomed Eng 2013; 41: 1758-1766
  • 3 Basset FA, Chouinard R, Boulay MR. Training profile counts for time-to-exhaustion performance. Can J Appl Physiol 2003; 28: 654-666
  • 4 Boyer KA, Nigg BM. Changes in muscle activity in response to different impact forces affect soft tissue compartment mechanical properties. J Biomech Eng 2007; 129: 594-602
  • 5 Burden AM, Trew M, Baltzopoulos V. Normalisation of gait EMGs: a re-examination. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2003; 13: 519-532
  • 6 Dannecker EA, Koltyn KF. Pain during and within hours after exercise in healthy adults. Sport Med 2014; 44: 921-942
  • 7 Daoud AI, Geissler GJ, Wang F, Saretsky J, Daoud YA, Lieberman DE. Foot strike and injury rates in endurance runners: a retrospective study. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012; 44: 1325-1334
  • 8 Diver C, Mornieux G, Baur H, Mayer F, Belli A. Mechanical comparison of barefoot and shod running. Int J Sports Med 2005; 26: 593-598
  • 9 Enders H, von Tscharner V, Nigg BM. The effects of preferred and non-preferred running strike patterns on tissue vibration properties. J Sci Med Sport 2013; 17: 218-222
  • 10 Ferris DP, Liang K, Farley CT. Runners adjust leg stiffness for their first step on a new running surface. J Biomech 1999; 32: 787-794
  • 11 Gallant JL, Pierrynowski MR. A theoretical perspective on running-related injuries. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2014; 104: 211-220
  • 12 Giandolini M, Arnal PJ, Millet GY, Peyrot N, Samozino P, Dubois B, Morin JB. Impact reduction during running: efficiency of simple acute interventions in recreational runners. Eur J Appl Physiol 2013; 113: 599-609
  • 13 Hamill J, Russell EM, Gruber AH, Miller R. Impact characteristics in shod and barefoot running. Footwear Sci 2011; 3: 33-40
  • 14 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2016 update. Int J Sport Med 2015; 36: 1121-1124
  • 15 Hreljac A. Etiology, prevention, and early intervention of overuse injuries in runners: a biomechanical perspective. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2005; 16: 651-667
  • 16 Kamen G. Electromyographic kinesiology. In: Robertson DGE. (ed.) Research Methods in Biomechanics. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2004: 163-181
  • 17 Komi PV, Gollhofer A, Schmidtbleicher D, Frick U. Interaction between man and shoe in running: considerations for a more comprehensive measurement approach. Int J Sports Med 1987; 8: 196-202
  • 18 Lack S, Barton C, Sohan O, Crossley K, Morrissey D. Proximal muscle rehabilitation is effective for patellofemoral pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 2015; bjsports - 2015-094723
  • 19 Landreneau LL, Watts K, Heitzman JE, Childers WL. Lower limb muscle activity during forefoot and rearfoot strike running techniques. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2014; 9: 888-897
  • 20 Leger L, Boucher R. An indirect continuous running multistage field test: the Universite de Montreal track test. Can J Appl Sport Sci 1980; 5: 77-84
  • 21 Lieberman DE, Raichlen DA, Pontzer H, Bramble DM, Cutright-Smith E. The human gluteus maximus and its role in running. J Exp Biol 2006; 209: 2143-2155
  • 22 Lieberman DE, Venkadesan M, Werbel WA, Daoud AI, D’Andrea S, Davis IS, Mang’eni RO, Pitsiladis Y. Foot strike patterns and collision forces in habitually barefoot versus shod runners. Nature 2010; 463: 531-535
  • 23 Lieberman DE. What we can learn about running from barefoot running: an evolutionary medical perspective. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2012; 40: 63-72
  • 24 Montgomery 3rd WH, Pink M, Perry J. Electromyographic analysis of hip and knee musculature during running. Am J Sports Med 1994; 22: 272-278
  • 25 Morley JB, Decker LM, Dierks T, Blanke D, French JA, Stergiou N. Effects of varying amounts of pronation on the mediolateral ground reaction forces during barefoot versus shod running. J Appl Biomech 2010; 26: 205-214
  • 26 Mündermann A, Nigg BM, Humble RN, Stefanyshyn DJ. Orthotic comfort is related to kinematics, kinetics, and EMG in recreational runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35: 1710-1719
  • 27 Murley GS, Landorf KB, Menz HB, Bird AR. Effect of foot posture, foot orthoses and footwear on lower limb muscle activity during walking and running: a systematic review. Gait Posture 2009; 29: 172-187
  • 28 Nielsen RO, Buist I, Sorensen H, Lind M, Rasmussen S. Training errors and running related injuries: a systematic review. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2012; 7: 58-75
  • 29 Nigg BM. The role of impact forces and foot pronation: a new paradigm. Clin J Sport Med 2001; 11: 2-9
  • 30 Olin ED, Gutierrez GM. EMG and tibial shock upon the first attempt at barefoot running. Hum Mov Sci 2013; 32: 343-352
  • 31 Perl DP, Daoud AI, Lieberman DE. Effects of footwear and strike type on running economy. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012; 44: 1335-1343
  • 32 Powers CM. The influence of abnormal hip mechanics on knee injury: a biomechanical perspective. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010; 40: 42-51
  • 33 Rao G, Chambon N, Guéguen N, Berton E, Delattre N. Does wearing shoes affect your biomechanical efficiency?. J Biomech 2015; 48: 413-417
  • 34 Reber L, Perry J, Pink M. Muscular control of the ankle in running. Am J Sports Med 1993; 21: 805-810 discussion 810
  • 35 Rixe JA, Gallo RA, Silvis ML. The barefoot debate: can minimalist shoes reduce running-related injuries?. Curr Sports Med Rep 2012; 11: 160-165
  • 36 Robbins SE, Gouw GJ. Athletic footwear: unsafe due to perceptual illusions. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1991; 23: 217-224
  • 37 Rossiter HB, Kowalchuk JM, Whipp BJ. A test to establish maximum O2 uptake despite no plateau in the O2 uptake response to ramp incremental exercise. J Appl Physiol 2006; 100: 764-770
  • 38 Schieb DA. Kinematic accommodation of novice treadmill runners. Res Q Exerc Sport 1986; 57: 1-7
  • 39 Shih Y, Lin KL, Shiang TY. Is the foot striking pattern more important than barefoot or shod conditions in running?. Gait Posture 2013; 38: 490-494
  • 40 Stacoff A, Nigg BM, Reinschmidt C, van den Bogert AJ, Lundberg A. Tibiocalcaneal kinematics of barefoot versus shod running. J Biomech 2000; 33: 1387-1395
  • 41 Warne JP, Kilduff SM, Gregan BC, Nevill AM, Moran KA, Warrington GD. A 4-week instructed minimalist running transition and gait-retraining changes plantar pressure and force. Scand J Med Sci Sport 2013; 24: 964-973
  • 42 Williams 3rd DS, Green DH, Wurzinger B. Changes in lower extremity movement and power absorption during forefoot striking and barefoot running. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2012; 7: 525-532
  • 43 De Wit B, De-Clercq D, Aerts P. Biomechanical analysis of the stance phase during barefoot and shod running. J Biomech 2000; 33: 269-278