Download PDF
Indian Journal of Neurotrauma 2015; 12(02): 117-121
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1569469
Original Article
Neurotrauma Society of India

Long-Term Outcomes of Paraplegics in a Resource-Limited Society: Are We Doing Enough?

Humam N. Tanki
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Sheri-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Jammu and Kashmir, India
,
Nayil Khursheed
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Sheri-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Jammu and Kashmir, India
,
Abdul Q. Khan
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Sheri-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Jammu and Kashmir, India
,
Majid A. Ganie
2   Department of Psychiatry, Sheri-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Jammu and Kashmir, India
,
Altaf U. Ramzan
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Sheri-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Jammu and Kashmir, India
,
Farah N. Tanki
3   Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
,
Abrar A. Wani
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Sheri-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Jammu and Kashmir, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

27 August 2015

15 October 2015

Publication Date:
17 December 2015 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Cases of paraplegia form a considerable proportion of patient population visiting neurosurgical and neurologic units. Paraplegia not only alters the physical condition of the patient but also his/her mental, psychological, and social well-being. We collected data of 30 patients with paraplegia admitted during a period of 4 years who were followed then for a minimum period of 1 year. Those patients were evaluated for their neurologic improvement and complications usually associated with paraplegia. We found that patients with preserved sensations have better outcome and should be aggressively treated by surgery; whereas in patients who have no motor and sensory function at the time of injury, the decision regarding surgery should be guarded. We also derived that most common complications on follow-up include pressure sores, bladder dysfunction, and deep venous thrombosis, and evaluating them for depression and anxiety is mostly overlooked. We stress that the need of the hour in a resource-limited society such as ours is an intensely committed psychological rehabilitation in this group of patients.

Keywords

spinal cord injury - paraplegia - complications - psychological complications
 

  • References

  • 1 Bohlman HH, Freehafer A, Dejak J. The results of treatment of acute injuries of the upper thoracic spine with paralysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985; 67 (3) 360-369
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Marino RJ, Barros T, Biering-Sorensen F , et al; ASIA Neurological Standards Committee 2002. International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2003; 26 (26) (Suppl. 01) S50-S56
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 McKinley WO, Jackson AB, Cardenas DD, DeVivo MJ. Long-term medical complications after traumatic spinal cord injury: a regional model systems analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80 (11) 1402-1410
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Ackery A, Tator C, Krassioukov A. A global perspective on spinal cord injury epidemiology. J Neurotrauma 2004; 21 (10) 1355-1370
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Reff. Medical Research Council. Aids to the examination of the peripheral nervous system, Memorandum no. 45, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1981.
    PubMed
  • 6 Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 67 (6) 361-370
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 O'Connor PJ. Trends in spinal cord injury. Accid Anal Prev 2006; 38 (1) 71-77
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Fiedler IG, Laud PW, Maiman DJ, Apple DF. Economics of managed care in spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80 (11) 1441-1449
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Ramer MS, Harper GP, Bradbury EJ. Progress in spinal cord research—a refined strategy for the International Spinal Research Trust. Spinal Cord 2000; 38 (8) 449-472
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Harrop JS, Naroji S, Maltenfort MG , et al. Neurologic improvement after thoracic, thoracolumbar, and lumbar spinal cord (conus medullaris) injuries. Spine 2011; 36 (1) 21-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Giacomini L, Mathias RN, Joaquim AF, Fabbro MD, Ghizoni E, Tedeschi H. Is there a right time for surgery in paraplegic patients secondary to non traumatic spinal cord compression?. Einstein (São Paulo) 2012; 10 (4) 508-11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Go BK, DeVivo MJ, Richards JS. The epidemiology of spinal cord injury. In: Stover SL, DeLisa JA, Whiteneck GG, eds. Spinal Cord Injury: Clinical Outcomes from the Model Systems. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen; 1995: 21-55
    Google Scholar
  • 13 National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center (NSCISC). Annual Report for the Model Spinal Cord Injury Systems of Care. Birmingham, England: Univ Alabama; 1999
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Siddhartha SS, Deepak G, Mahapatra AK. Traumatic paraplegia outcome study at an apex trauma centre. Indian J Neurotrauma 2011; 8 (1) 33-36
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 McAfee PC, Yuan HA, Lasda NA. The unstable burst fracture. Spine 1982; 7 (4) 365-373
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Furlan JC, Fehlings MG. A Web-based systematic review on traumatic spinal cord injury comparing the “citation classics” with the consumers' perspectives. J Neurotrauma 2006; 23 (2) 156-169
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Tate DG, Boninger ML, Jackson AB. Future directions for spinal cord injury research: recent developments and model systems contributions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 92 (3) 509-515
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Simpson LA, Eng JJ, Hsieh JT, Wolfe DL . Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence Scire Research Team. The health and life priorities of individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. J Neurotrauma 2012; 29 (8) 1548-1555
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Bodenhamer E, Achterberg-Lawlis J, Kevorkian G, Belanus A, Cofer J. Staff and patient perceptions of the psychosocial concerns of spinal cord injured persons. Am J Phys Med 1983; 62 (4) 182-193
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Ernst FA. Contrasting perceptions of distress by research personnel and their spinal cord injured subjects. Am J Phys Med 1987; 66 (1) 12-15
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Cushman LA, Dijkers MP. Depressed mood in spinal cord injured patients: staff perceptions and patient realities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990; 71 (3) 191-196
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Dijkers M, Cushman LA. Differences between rehabilitation disciplines in views of depression in spinal cord injury patients. Paraplegia 1990; 28 (6) 380-391
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Hancock KM, Craig AR, Dickson HG, Chang E, Martin J. Anxiety and depression over the first year of spinal cord injury: a longitudinal study. Paraplegia 1993; 31 (6) 349-357
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Chan SC, Chan AP. One-year follow-up of Chinese people with spinal cord injury: a preliminary study. J Spinal Cord Med 2013; 36 (1) 12-23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Kerr WG, Thompson MA. Acceptance of disability of sudden onset in paraplegia. Paraplegia 1972; 10 (1) 94-102
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Woodrich F, Patterson JB. Variables related to acceptance of disability in persons with spinal cord injuries. J Rehabil 1983; 49 (3) 26-30
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Richards JS. Psychologic adjustment to spinal cord injury during first postdischarge year. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986; 67 (6) 362-365
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Dryden DM, Saunders LD, Rowe BH , et al. Depression following traumatic spinal cord injury. Neuroepidemiology 2005; 25 (2) 55-61
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Hasan SA, Alam Z, Hakim M , et al. Rehabilitation of patients with paraplegia from spinal cord injury: a review. JCMCTA 2009; 20 (1) 53-57
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Suzuki R, Krahn GL, McCarthy MJ, Adams EJ. Understanding health outcomes: Physical secondary conditions in people with spinal cord injury. Rehabil Psychol 2007; 52: 338
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Costa M, Stegagno L, Schandry R, Bitti PE. Contingent negative variation and cognitive performance in hypotension. Psychophysiology 1998; 35 (6) 737-744
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Duschek S, Matthias E, Schandry R. Essential hypotension is accompanied by deficits in attention and working memory. Behav Med 2005; 30 (4) 149-158
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Duschek S, Weisz N, Schandry R. Reduced cognitive performance and prolonged reaction time accompany moderate hypotension. Clin Auton Res 2003; 13 (6) 427-432
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Weisz N, Schandry R, Jacobs AM, Mialet JP, Duschek S. Early contingent negative variation of the EEG and attentional flexibility are reduced in hypotension. Int J Psychophysiol 2002; 45 (3) 253-260
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Duschek S, Schandry R. Cognitive performance and cerebral blood flow in essential hypotension. Psychophysiology 2004; 41 (6) 905-913
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Duschek S, Schandry R. Reduced brain perfusion and cognitive performance due to constitutional hypotension. Clin Auton Res 2007; 17 (2) 69-76
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Talbot HS. The sexual function in paraplegia. J Urol 1955; 73 (1) 91-100
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Phelps G, Brown M, Chen J , et al. Sexual experience and plasma testosterone levels in male veterans after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983; 64 (2) 47-52
    PubMedGoogle Scholar