Download PDF
Indian Journal of Neurotrauma 2015; 12(02): 128-134
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1569470
Original Article
Neurotrauma Society of India

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Auditory Stimulation on Selected Parameters of Comatose Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury

Yadav Parveen
1   Neuronursing Division, National Institute of Nursing Education, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, Punjab, India
,
Manju Dhandapani
1   Neuronursing Division, National Institute of Nursing Education, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, Punjab, India
,
Sivashanmugam Dhandapani
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, Punjab, India
,
Sunil K. Gupta
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, Punjab, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

11 May 2015

15 October 2015

Publication Date:
17 December 2015 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Problem Considered Prevention of sensory deprivation and early sensory stimulation are essential to enhance optimal recovery in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). This was an RCT to assess the efficacy of auditory stimulation on various physiologic parameters and level of consciousness in comatose patients of TBI.

Methods A total of 80 comatose patients with TBI were enrolled and 40 were assigned using computer-generated random table in each intervention and control group. In intervention group, auditory stimulation was provided by a family member talking to the patient for 10 minutes, twice daily for 2 weeks. Physiologic parameters such as heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure, Spo 2, and level of consciousness were recorded before, during and after each intervention. Parameters in the control group were recorded on days 1, 7, and 14.

Results Baseline characteristics in both the groups were comparable. On day 7, GCS was significantly higher (7.26 ± 2.39) in intervention group as compared with (5.54 ± 1.75) control group. On day 14, GCS was again significantly higher (8.17 ± 2.06) in intervention group as compared with (6.34 ± 2.36) control group. There was significant increase in PR and Spo 2 during and after intervention.

Conclusion Auditory stimulation by family members appears to be effective in improving level of consciousness in comatose patients with TBI.

Keywords

traumatic brain injury - coma - auditory stimulation - communication - consciousness
 

  • References

  • 1 Dhandapani SS, Manju D, Mahapatra AK. The economic divide in outcome following severe head injury. Asian J Neurosurg 2012; 7 (1) 17-20
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs. National Crime Records Bureau: 2010 Accidental Deaths and Suicides in India. New Delhi, India: Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs; 2010
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Dhandapani M, Dhandapani S, Agarwal M, Mahapatra AK. Pressure ulcer in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: significant factors and association with neurological outcome. J Clin Nurs 2014; 23 (7–8) 1114-1119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Gorji MAH, Araghiyansc F, Jafari H, Gorgi AM, Yazdani J. Effect of auditory stimulation on traumatic coma duration in intensive care unit of Medical Sciences University of Mazandarn, Iran. Saudi J Anaesth 2014; 8 (1) 69-72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Pape TL, Rosenow JM, Harton B , et al. Preliminary framework for familiar auditory sensory training (FAST) provided during coma recovery. J Rehabil Res Dev 2012; 49 (7) 1137-1152
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 1974; 2 (7872) 81-84
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Dhandapani SS, Manju D, Sharma BS, Mahapatra AK. Clinical malnutrition in severe traumatic brain injury: factors associated and outcome at 6 months. Indian J Neurotrauma 2007; 4: 35-39
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Dhandapani SS, Manju D, Vivekanandhan S, Agarwal M, Mahapatra AK. Prospective longitudinal study of biochemical changes in critically ill patients with severe traumatic brain injury: factors associated and outcome at 6 months. Indian J Neurotrauma 2010; 7: 23-27
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Dhandapani S, Sarda AC, Kapoor A, Salunke P, Mathuriya SN, Mukherjee KK. Validation of a new clinico-radiological grading for compound head injury: implications on the prognosis and the need for surgical intervention. World Neurosurg 2015; 84: 1244-1250
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Sosnowski C, Ustik M. Early intervention: coma stimulation in the intensive care unit. J Neurosci Nurs 1994; 26 (6) 336-341
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Bos S. Coma stimulation. Online J Knowl Synth Nurs 1997; 4: 1-6
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Sisson R. Effects of auditory stimuli on comatose patients with head injury. Heart Lung 1990; 19 (4) 373-378
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Jones R, Hux K, Morton-Anderson KA, Knepper L. Auditory stimulation effect on a comatose survivor of traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75 (2) 164-171
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Tanaka YL, Kudo Y. Effects of familiar voices on brain activity. Int J Nurs Pract 2012; 18 (Suppl. 02) 38-44
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kleim JA, Jones TA. Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2008; 51 (1) S225-S239
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Ludlow CL, Hoit J, Kent R , et al. Translating principles of neural plasticity into research on speech motor control recovery and rehabilitation. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2008; 51 (1) S240-S258
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Abbasi M, Mohammadi E, Sheaykh Rezayi A. Effect of a regular family visiting program as an affective, auditory, and tactile stimulation on the consciousness level of comatose patients with a head injury. Jpn J Nurs Sci 2009; 6 (1) 21-26
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injury. National Institute of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement 1998;16:1–41. http://calder.med.miami.edu/pointis/tbifam/coma2.html . Accessed April 10, 2015
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Coma guide for caregivers. Delaware health and social services, division of services for aging and adults with physical disabilities. 1901 N. DuPont Highway, New Castle, DE 19720. http://dhss.delaware.gov/dhss/dsaapd/ files/coma_guide.pdf . Accessed April 10, 2015
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Davis AE, Gimenez A. Cognitive-behavioral recovery in comatose patients following auditory sensory stimulation. J Neurosci Nurs 2003; 35 (4) 202-209 , 214
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Urbenjaphol P, Jitpanya C, Khaoropthum S. Effects of the sensory stimulation program on recovery in unconscious patients with traumatic brain injury. J Neurosci Nurs 2009; 41: 10-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Mandeep CN, Goel S, Sood S. Traumatic head injury: early intervention by coma arousal therapy. Indian J Neurotrauma 2013; 10: 13-18
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Puggina ACG, Silva MJL. Pd. Santos JLF. Use of music and voice stimulus on patients with disorders of consciousness. J Neurosci Nurs 2011; 43: 1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Walker JS, Eakes GG, Siebelink E. The effects of familial voice interventions on comatose head-injured patients. J Trauma Nurs 1998; 5 (2) 41-45
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Bassampour S, Zakerimoghadam M, Faghihzadeh S, Goudarzi F. The effect of organized auditory stimulations on the consciousness level of comatose patients. Journal of Hayat 2007; 13: 89-91
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Cheng L, Gosseries O, Ying L , et al. Assessment of localisation to auditory stimulation in post-comatose states: use the patient's own name. BMC Neurol 2013; 13: 27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Machado C, Korein J, Aubert E , et al. Recognizing a mother's voice in the persistent vegetative state. Clin EEG Neurosci 2007; 38 (3) 124-126
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Marzieh M, Mohammad G, Tahereh A, Hadi JN, Ali Z. Effect of light music on physiological parameters of patients with traumatic brain injuries at intensive care units. Ofogh-e-Danesh 2012; 18: 66-74
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Dhandapani S, Sharma A, Sharma K, Das L. Comparative evaluation of MRS and SPECT in prognostication of patients with mild to moderate head injury. J Clin Neurosci 2014; 21 (5) 745-750
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Orem DE. Nursing: Concepts of Practice. St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book; 1991
    Google Scholar