Indian Journal of Neurotrauma 2015; 12(02): 122-127
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1569475
Original Article
Neurotrauma Society of India

Outcome of Penetrating Brain Injury in Civilian Practice

Ram Avatar Malav
1   Department of Neurosurgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Bal Krishna Ojha
1   Department of Neurosurgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Anil Chandra
1   Department of Neurosurgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Sunil K. Singh
1   Department of Neurosurgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Chhitij Srivastava
1   Department of Neurosurgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Nagesh Chandra
1   Department of Neurosurgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Saurabh Srivastava
1   Department of Neurosurgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Amit Gupta
1   Department of Neurosurgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

11 June 2015

19 October 2015

Publication Date:
18 December 2015 (online)

Abstract

Introduction There is a dramatic increase in the incidence and little is known about outcome and recovery of penetrating brain injuries. Our study is based on analysis of clinical-radiological profile and outcome of patients of penetrating brain injuries.

Method This is a retrospective analysis of patients with penetrating head injury during the period from June 2004 to May 2013. Patients with penetrating head injury were selected from our hospital record. Their operative findings were evaluated and only those patients with documented penetration of the dura by a foreign material were selected for data collection and analysis.

Results A total of 60 patients were recruited in the study. Their mean age was 27 years, and most patients were male. Most common clinical presentation was brain matter and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak in 48 (60%) patients followed by decreased level of consciousness in 40 (66.67%) patients. Frontal lobe was most commonly involved part in 24 (40%) patients followed by multiple lobe injury noted in 16 (26.66%) patients. Twelve patients expired during the hospital stay. Thirteen patients were discharged in GOS-2, 15 in GOS-3, and 20 in GOS-4. Wound infection occurred in 11 (18.33%) patients, and seizure developed in 8 (13.33%) patients.

Conclusion Penetrating brain injuries are most common in 11- to 30-year-old age group and occur more commonly in male. Most common presentations were brain matter or CSF leak and most common mode of injury was firearm. Frontal lobe was the most commonly injured part of the brain and mortality was 20%. Higher mortality was observed among patients with seizure than in other patients with penetrating brain injury.

 
  • References

  • 1 Kazim SF, Shamim MS, Tahir MZ, Enam SA, Waheed S. Management of penetrating brain injury. J Emerg Trauma Shock 2011; 4: 395-402
  • 2 Gururaj G. Road traffic deaths, injuries and disabilities in India: current scenario. Natl Med J India 2008; 21 (1) 14-20
  • 3 Nathoo N, Boodhoo H, Nadvi SS, Naidoo SR, Gouws E. Transcranial brainstem stab injuries: a retrospective analysis of 17 patients. Neurosurgery 2000; 47 (5) 1117-1122 , discussion 1123
  • 4 Siccardi D, Cavaliere R, Pau A, Lubinu F, Turtas S, Viale GL. Penetrating craniocerebral missile injuries in civilians: a retrospective analysis of 314 cases. Surg Neurol 1991; 35 (6) 455-460
  • 5 Deng D, Dan G, Tao J , et al. Conventional and contrast-enhanced ultrasound assessment of craniocerebral gunshot wounds. Genet Mol Res 2015; 14 (2) 3345-3354
  • 6 Bhat AR, Wani MA, Kirmani AR , et al. Disaster management of civilian gunshot head wounds in north Indian state. Indian J Neurotrauma 2009; 6 (1) 27-42
  • 7 Kim TW, Lee JK, Moon KS , et al. Penetrating gunshot injuries to the brain. J Trauma 2007; 62 (6) 1446-1451
  • 8 Zafonte RD, Wood DL, Harrison-Felix CL, Valena NV, Black K. Penetrating head injury: a prospective study of outcomes. Neurol Res 2001; 23 (2–3) 219-226
  • 9 Exadaktylos AK, Stettbacher A, Bautz PC, Terries J. The value of protocol-driven CT scanning in stab wounds to the head. Am J Emerg Med 2002; 20 (4) 295-297
  • 10 Clark WC, Muhlbauer MS, Watridge CB, Ray MW. Analysis of 76 civilian craniocerebral gunshot wounds. J Neurosurg 1986; 65 (1) 9-14
  • 11 Grahm TW, Williams Jr FC, Harrington T, Spetzler RF. Civilian gunshot wounds to the head: a prospective study. Neurosurgery 1990; 27 (5) 696-700 , discussion 700
  • 12 Levy ML, Masri LS, Lavine S, Apuzzo ML. Outcome prediction after penetrating craniocerebral injury in a civilian population: aggressive surgical management in patients with admission Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 3, 4, or 5. Neurosurgery 1994; 35 (1) 77-84 , discussion 84–85
  • 13 Liebenberg WA, Demetriades AK, Hankins M, Hardwidge C, Hartzenberg BH. Penetrating civilian craniocerebral Gunshot wounds: A protocol of delayed surgery. Neurosurgery 2005; 57: 293-299
  • 14 Kaufman HH, Makela ME, Lee KF, Haid Jr RW, Gildenberg PL. Gunshot wounds to the head: a perspective. Neurosurgery 1986; 18: 689-695
  • 15 Mancuso P, Chiaramonte I, Passanisi M, Guarnera F, Augello G, Tropea R. Craniocerebral gunshot wound in civilian. J Neurosurg Sci 1988; 32: 189-194
  • 16 Pitlyk PJ, Tolchin S, Stewart W. The experimental significance of retained intracranial bone fragments. J Neurosurg 1970; 33 (1) 19-24
  • 17 Aarabi B, Taghipour M, Haghnegahdar A, Farokhi M, Mobley L. Prognostic factors in the occurrence of posttraumatic epilepsy after penetrating head injury suffered during military service. Neurosurg Focus 2000; 8 (1) e1
  • 18 Brandvold B, Levi L, Feinsod M, George ED. Penetrating craniocerebral injuries in the Israeli involvement in the Lebanese conflict, 1982–1985. Analysis of a less aggressive surgical approach. J Neurosurg 1990; 72 (1) 15-21
  • 19 Weiss GH, Salazar AM, Vance SC, Grafman JH, Jabbari B. Predicting posttraumatic epilepsy in penetrating head injury. Arch Neurol 1986; 43 (8) 771-773