Direct Carotid Exposure for Neuroendovascular Approaches

Abstract

Objective The transfemoral approach is a common route for catheterization of the supra-aortic vessels in neuroendovascular therapy. However, in some cases, the patient's anatomy prevents transfemoral catheterization or distal access to the carotid s. In such cases, direct carotid exposure (DCE) for neuroendovascular approaches may be used to treat cerebrovascular diseases.

Methods We present 11 cases in which we were unable to perform the distal approach and DCE was the preferred neuroendovascular treatment procedure.

Results DCE was performed on 11 patients with cerebral aneurysm (n = 8), carotid cavernous fistula (CCF) (n = 1), malignant brain tumor (n = 1), and carotid angioplasty and stenting (n = 1). Ten patients were female; one was male. Ages ranged from 63 to 87 years (mean: 71.36 years). Coil embolization was performed on patients with cerebral aneurysm and CCF. The patient with a malignant brain tumor underwent polyvinyl alcohol particle embolization. The only complication was a carotid artery dissection that occurred in one patient during stenting.

Conclusion DCE for neuroendovascular approaches can be used as an alternative for patients with tortuous vasculature access in the femoral route. In such patients, a combination of neuroendovascular treatment and surgery in a hybrid operating room with angiography is preferred.

Keywords

direct carotid exposure - neuroendovascular therapy - cerebral angiography

• References

• 1 Moniz E. L'encéphalographie artérielle, son importance dans la localisation des tumeurs cérébrales. Rev Neurol 1927; 2: 72-89
• 2 Diethrich EB, Marx P, Wrasper R, Reid DB. Percutaneous techniques for endoluminal carotid interventions. J Endovasc Surg 1996; 3 (2) 182-202
• 3 Jahshan S, Hopkins III LN. If you want to learn new things, read old books: cutdown techniques are well described in the old literature. World Neurosurg 2012; 77 (1) 83-84
• 4 Yilmaz A, Ozkul A, Shin DS, Im SB, Yoon SM, Kim BT. Morphological assessment of cadaveric radial, brachial and subclavian arteries: a neurointerventional approach. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2015; 58 (6) 499-503
• 5 Guimaraens L, Theron J, Casasco A, Cuellar H. Carotid artery stenting by direct percutaneous puncture. J Vasc Surg 2011; 54 (1) 249-251
• 6 Ross IB, Luzardo GD. Direct access to the carotid circulation by cut down for endovascular neuro-interventions. Surg Neurol 2006; 65 (2) 207-211 ; discussion 211
• 7 Larrazabal R, Klurfan P, Sarma D, Gunnarsson T. Surgical exposure of the carotid artery for endovascular interventional procedures. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2010; 152 (3) 537-544
• 8 Aletich VA, Debrun GM, Misra M, Charbel F, Ausman JI. The remodeling technique of balloon-assisted Guglielmi detachable coil placement in wide-necked aneurysms: experience at the University of Illinois at Chicago. J Neurosurg 2000; 93 (3) 388-396
• 9 Levy EI, Kim SH, Bendok BR, Qureshi AI, Guterman LR, Hopkins LN. Transradial stenting of the cervical internal carotid artery: technical case report. Neurosurgery 2003; 53 (2) 448-451 ; discussion 451–452
• 10 Yoo BS, Lee SH, Kim JY , et al. A case of transradial carotid stenting in a patient with total occlusion of distal abdominal aorta. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002; 56 (2) 243-245
• 11 Pipinos II, Bruzoni M, Johanning JM, Matthew Longo G, Lynch TG. Transcervical carotid stenting with flow reversal for neuroprotection: technique, results, advantages, and limitations. Vascular 2006; 14 (5) 245-255
• 12 Taha MM, Sakaida H, Asakura F , et al. Access site complications with carotid angioplasty and stenting. Surg Neurol 2007; 68 (4) 431-437
• 13 Treitl KM, König C, Reiser MF, Treitl M. Complications of transbrachial arterial access for peripheral endovascular interventions. J Endovasc Ther 2015; 22 (1) 63-70
• 14 Pipinos II, Johanning JM, Pham CN, Soundararajan K, Lynch TG. Transcervical approach with protective flow reversal for carotid angioplasty and stenting. J Endovasc Ther 2005; 12 (4) 446-453
• 15 Matsumoto H, Fujita K, Miki J, Tsuji N, Terada T, Itakura T. Direct carotid approach for carotid angioplasty and stenting with a small incision: a technical case report. [in Japanese]. No Shinkei Geka 2004; 32 (7) 735-740
• 16 Perez-Arjona EA, DelProsto Z, Fessler RD. Direct percutaneous carotid artery stenting with distal protection: technical case report. Neurol Res 2004; 26 (3) 338-341
• 17 Blanc R, Mounayer C, Piotin M, Sadik JC, Spelle L, Moret J. Hemostatic closure device after carotid puncture for stent and coil placement in an intracranial aneurysm: technical note. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002; 23 (6) 978-981
• 18 Carey D, Martin JR, Moore CA, Valentine MC, Nygaard TW. Complications of femoral artery closure devices. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001; 52 (1) 3-7 ; discussion 8
• 19 Dorfer C, Standhardt H, Gruber A, Ferraz-Leite H, Knosp E, Bavinzski G. Direct percutaneous puncture approach versus surgical cutdown technique for intracranial neuroendovascular procedures: technical aspects. World Neurosurg 2012; 77 (1) 192-200
• 20 Halbach VV, Higashida RT, Dowd CF, Barnwell SL, Hieshima GB. Treatment of carotid-cavernous fistulas associated with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Neurosurgery 1990; 26 (6) 1021-1027
• 21 Halbach VV, Higashida RT, Hieshima GB, Hardin CW. Direct puncture of the proximally occluded internal carotid artery for treatment of carotid cavernous fistulas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1989; 10 (1) 151-154
• 22 Matas M, Alvarez B, Ribo M, Molina C, Maeso J, Alvarez-Sabin J. Transcervical carotid stenting with flow reversal protection: experience in high-risk patients. J Vasc Surg 2007; 46 (1) 49-54