Over Ten Years of Experience with a Modified Right Atrial Anastomosis in Orthotopic Heart Transplantation: Follow-up and Comparison with the Biatrial and Bicaval Technique
08 April 2016
23 May 2016
05 July 2016 (online)
Background In 1997, a modified right atrial anastomosis (cavoatrial technique) for orthotopic heart transplantation (oHTx) was first developed in our institution. The purpose of this study is to report our long-term experience with this technique compared with biatrial and bicaval technique.
Methods Retrospectively, 202 consecutive oHTx between 1997 and 2013 were analyzed. The applied transplantation techniques were biatrial (n = 108), bicaval (n = 22), and cavoatrial (n = 72).
Results Demographic data were similar in all groups. The cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp time were significantly shorter in the biatrial group. Follow-up echocardiographic examination showed excellent results in all groups with no relevant differences. After 1 year, occurrence of severe tricuspid regurgitation (biatrial 1.9% vs bicaval 0.0% vs cavoatrial 1.4%) was low in all groups. Rate of permanent pacemaker implantations was also low (12.0% vs 5.0% vs 11.1%). There were no significant differences in survival between the groups.
Conclusion The cavoatrial technique can be a safe and simple alternative for heart transplantation. Easy handling and similar reduced postoperative complications encourage the use of this technique.
Parts of this manuscript were presented (Scientific poster) at the Annual Meeting of the German Transplantation Society (DTG) in Dresden, Germany on October 22, 2015.
- 1 Barnard CN. The operation. A human cardiac transplant: an interim report of a successful operation performed at Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town. S Afr Med J 1967; 41 (48) 1271-1274
- 2 Shumway NE, Lower RR, Stofer RC. Transplantation of the heart. Adv Surg 1966; 2: 265-284
- 3 Dreyfus G, Jebara V, Mihaileanu S, Carpentier AF. Total orthotopic heart transplantation: an alternative to the standard technique. Ann Thorac Surg 1991; 52 (05) 1181-1184
- 4 Blanche C, Czer LS, Valenza M, Trento A. Alternative technique for orthotopic heart transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg 1994; 57 (03) 765-767
- 5 Kitamura S, Nakatani T, Bando K, Sasako Y, Kobayashi J, Yagihara T. Modification of bicaval anastomosis technique for orthotopic heart transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 72 (04) 1405-1406
- 6 Marelli D, Silvestry SC, Zwas D. , et al. Modified inferior vena caval anastomosis to reduce tricuspid valve regurgitation after heart transplantation. Tex Heart Inst J 2007; 34 (01) 30-35
- 7 Aziz TM, Burgess MI, El-Gamel A. , et al. Orthotopic cardiac transplantation technique: a survey of current practice. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68 (04) 1242-1246
- 8 Morgan JA, Edwards NM. Orthotopic cardiac transplantation: comparison of outcome using biatrial, bicaval, and total techniques. J Card Surg 2005; 20 (01) 102-106
- 9 Fraund S, Rahimi A, Hirt S, Schöneich F, Böning A, Cremer J. Alternative technique of the right atrial anastomosis (cavo-atrial) in orthotopic heart transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 81 (01) 381-382
- 10 Jacob S, Sellke F. Is bicaval orthotopic heart transplantation superior to the biatrial technique?. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2009; 9 (02) 333-342
- 11 Schnoor M, Schäfer T, Lühmann D, Sievers HH. Bicaval versus standard technique in orthotopic heart transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 134 (05) 1322-1331
- 12 Kara I, Ay Y, Yanartaş M. , et al. Does the surgical technique used in the orthotopic heart transplant affect the results regarding the rhythm?. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg 2012; 12 (03) 255-260
- 13 Aziz T, Burgess M, Khafagy R. , et al. Bicaval and standard techniques in orthotopic heart transplantation: medium-term experience in cardiac performance and survival. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 118 (01) 115-122
- 14 Markowicz Pawlus E, Duszańska A, Przybylski R. , et al. Does the method of heart transplantation affect left ventricular filling?. Kardiol Pol 2012; 70 (08) 769-773