Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg 2016; 32(05): 520-531
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1586497
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Solid Implants in Facial Plastic Surgery: Potential Complications and How to Prevent Them

Krishna Patel
1   Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
,
Kathleyn Brandstetter
1   Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
28 September 2016 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Allogenic implants are an effective alternative to autologous grafts in the reconstruction of facial defects. These implants are used to reconstruct a variety of bony and soft-tissue defects, including the frontal and temporal regions; internal orbit; infraorbital rim; malar, paranasal, and nasal regions; mandible; and chin. In comparison to their autologous counterparts, alloplastic materials are more readily available, lack donor-site morbidity, decrease surgical time and cost, and still have relatively good postoperative tissue tolerance. However, these implants are not without their own spectrum of complications. Common solid implant materials include silicone, GoreTex (expanded polytetrafluorethylene; W. L. Gore & Associates Inc., Flagstaff, AZ), MedPor (high-density porous polyethylene; Porex Industries, Fairburn, GA), and Mersilene mesh (nonresorbable polyester fiber; Ethicon, Somerville, NJ). Each of these materials poses certain complication risks based on their surface contour (smooth vs. porous), pliability, and reactivity with surrounding tissue. In addition, certain implant locations within the head and neck are at risk for different postoperative complications. Although there are no evidence-based guidelines for implant reconstruction to help avoid common complications, there are several principles and techniques that are commonly employed by surgeons to help reduce complication rates. These include careful patient selection, proper choice of operative procedure, infection control practices (including pre/intraoperative systemic antibiotics, meticulous aseptic technique, impregnation/soaking of implant in antibiotic, irrigation of implant pocket with antibiotic, careful closure of tissue layers, and postoperative oral antibiotics), preoperative implant shaping, choice of surgical approach, and intraoperative surgical techniques. Larger, controlled trials are needed to confirm the efficacy of the aforementioned techniques in the reduction of postoperative complications.

Keywords

solid implants - facial reconstruction - silicone - MedPor - GoreTex
 

  • References

  • 1 North JF. The use of preserved bovine cartilage in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg (1946) 1953; 11 (4) 261-274
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Ridwan-Pramana A, Wolff J, Raziei A, Ashton-James CE, Forouzanfar T. Porous polyethylene implants in facial reconstruction: outcome and complications. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2015; 43 (8) 1330-1334
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Yaremchuk MJ. Facial skeletal reconstruction using porous polyethylene implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111 (6) 1818-1827
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Brandt MG, Moore CC. Implants in facial skeletal augmentation. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 21 (4) 396-399
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Morera Serna E, Scola Pliego E, Mir Ulldemolins N, Martínez Morán A. Treatment of chin deformities [in Spanish]. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2008; 59 (7) 349-358
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Desai SC, Moradzadeh A, Branham G. Anatomical evidence of microbial biofilms in an alloplastic nasal implant. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2013; 37 (2) 468-471
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Walker TJ, Toriumi DM. Analysis of facial implants for bacterial biofilm formation using scanning electron microscopy. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2016;
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Rubin JP, Yaremchuk MJ. Complications and toxicities of implantable biomaterials used in facial reconstructive and aesthetic surgery: a comprehensive review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 100 (5) 1336-1353
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Berghaus A, Stelter K. Alloplastic materials in rhinoplasty. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006; 14 (4) 270-277
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Whitaker LA. Aesthetic augmentation of the malar-midface structures. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987; 80 (3) 337-346
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Tantawi D, Eberlin S, Calvert J. Midface implants: surgical and nonsurgical alternatives. Clin Plast Surg 2015; 42 (1) 123-127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 de Moraes Ferreira AC, Muñoz XM, Okamoto R, Pellizer EP, Garcia Jr IR. Postoperative complications in craniomaxillofacial reconstruction with Medpor. J Craniofac Surg 2016; 27 (2) 425-428
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Villarreal PM, Monje F, Morillo AJ, Junquera LM, González C, Barbón JJ. Porous polyethylene implants in orbital floor reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (3) 877-885 , discussion 886–887
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Peled ZM, Warren AG, Johnston P, Yaremchuk MJ. The use of alloplastic materials in rhinoplasty surgery: a meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (3) 85e-92e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Bracaglia R, Fortunato R, Gentileschi S. Secondary rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2005; 29 (4) 230-239
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Yang P, Yang Q, Liu T , et al. A modified technique for expanded polytetrafluoroethylene shaping in chin augmentation: parallel groove carving technique. J Craniofac Surg 2015; 26 (2) e146-e148
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Gubisch W, Kotzur A. Our experience with silicone in rhinomentoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1998; 22 (4) 237-244
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Shadfar S, Farag A, Jarchow AM, Shockley WW. Safety and efficacy of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene implants in the surgical management of traumatic nasal deformity. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 141 (8) 710-715
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Niechajev I. Facial reconstruction using porous high-density polyethylene (Medpor): long-term results. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2012; 36 (4) 917-927
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Romo III T, Pearson JM. Nasal implants. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2008; 16 (1) 123-132 , vi
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Jin HR, Lee JY, Yeon JY, Rhee CS. A multicenter evaluation of the safety of Gore-Tex as an implant in Asian rhinoplasty. Am J Rhinol 2006; 20 (6) 615-619
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Godin MS, Waldman SR, Johnson Jr CM. Nasal augmentation using Gore-Tex. A 10-year experience. Arch Facial Plast Surg 1999; 1 (2) 118-121 , discussion 122
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Vuyk HD. Augmentation mentoplasty with solid silicone. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1996; 21 (2) 106-118
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Zide BM, Pfeifer TM, Longaker MT. Chin surgery: I. Augmentation—the allures and the alerts. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104 (6) 1843-1853 , discussion 1861–1862
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Gross EJ, Hamilton MM, Ackermann K, Perkins SW. Mersilene mesh chin augmentation. A 14-year experience. Arch Facial Plast Surg 1999; 1 (3) 183-189 , discussion 190
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Niamtu III J. Essentials of cheek and midface implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68 (6) 1420-1429
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Dong L, Hongyu X, Gao Z. Augmentation rhinoplasty with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene and prevention of complications. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2010; 12 (4) 246-251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Keefe MS, Keefe MA. An evaluation of the effectiveness of different techniques for intraoperative infiltration of antibiotics into alloplastic implants for use in facial reconstruction. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2009; 11 (4) 246-251
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Rai A, Datarkar A, Arora A, Adwani DG. Utility of high density porous polyethylene implants in maxillofacial surgery. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2014; 13 (1) 42-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Frodel JL, Lee S. The use of high-density polyethylene implants in facial deformities. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998; 124 (11) 1219-1223
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Conrad K, Torgerson CS, Gillman GS. Applications of Gore-Tex implants in rhinoplasty reexamined after 17 years. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2008; 10 (4) 224-231
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Yap EC, Abubakar SS, Olveda MB. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene as dorsal augmentation material in rhinoplasty on Southeast Asian noses: three-year experience. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2011; 13 (4) 234-238
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Hubbard TJ. Alloplast as an alternative for dorsal augmentation. Semin Plast Surg 2008; 22 (2) 104-109
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Godin M, Costa L, Romo T, Truswell W, Wang T, Williams E. Gore-Tex chin implants: a review of 324 cases. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2003; 5 (3) 224-227
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Wong JK. Forehead augmentation with alloplastic implants. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2010; 18 (1) 71-77
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Aynehchi BB, Burstein DH, Parhiscar A, Erlich MA. Vertical incision intraoral silicone chin augmentation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012; 146 (4) 553-559
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Chang C, Kong WK. Clinical effectiveness and safety of collagen sheet for dorsal augmentation in rhinoplasty. J Craniofac Surg 2014; 25 (5) 1852-1854
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar